Guidelines for photography of cutaneous marks and injuries: a multi-professional perspective

References

• Evans S. et al. (2014) Focussing on the future: Survey results on the image capture of patterned cutaneous injuries. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 24:7–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Child Protection Companion (2006) Guidance for clinicians on how to recognise and manage child abuse and neglect. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London, 1st Edition. http://www.rcpch.acuk/Policy/Child-Protection/Child-Protection-Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wright FD (1998) Photography in Bite Mark and Patterned Injury Documentation – Part 1. Journal of Forensic Sciences 43:4:877–880.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh. (2010) Injury Photography: Is it more than skin deep? The Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigation. 6(2).
   Google Scholar
• Jappie F. Non accidental injuries in children. Australian Family Physician1994;23(6):1144–1150 [Pubmed citation only].
   Google Scholar
• Murty OP, Ming CJ, Ezani MA, Yan PK, Yong TC. Physical injuries in fatal and non-fatal child abuse cases: A review of 16 years with hands on experience of 2 years in Malaysia. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine. 2006;9(1):33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann B, Püschel K, Mätzsch T. Forensic dermatological aspects of the battered child syndrome. Aktuelle Dermatologie. 1979;5(6):217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Patno K, Jenny C. Who slapped that child? Child Maltreatment. 2008;13(3):298–300 [Pubmed]
   Google Scholar
• Sheasby and MacDonald, (2001). A Forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. Forensic Science International. 122(1).
   Google Scholar
• Evans S, Jones C and Plassmann P. (2012). 3D imaging for bite mark analysis. Imaging Science Journal. DOI: 10.1179/1743131X11Y.0000000054.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-de-Las-Heras et al. (2007) Effectiveness of Comparison Overlays Generated with DentalPrint© Software in Bite Mark Analysis. Journal of Forensic Science, 52(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thali et al. (2003) Bite Mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic Science International 135(2).
   Google Scholar
• BAFO (British Association of Forensic Odontology) Guidelines Bite Mark Methodology (2001) http://www.bafo.org.uk/resources/bitemarks.php
   Google Scholar
• ABFO (American Board of Forensic Odontology) Bite mark Guidelines http://www.abfo.org/id_mark_guidelines.htm
   Google Scholar
• ACPO & NPIA (2007) Practice advice on police use of digital images. Produced on behalf of the Association of Chief Police Officers by the National Policing Improvement Agency. Professional Practice. Available on-line at [Accessed: October 2011]: http://www.acpo.police.uk/documents/crime/2007/200712CRIADI01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cohen N, MacLennan-Brown K (2007) Digital Imaging Procedure. Home Office Scientific Development Branch, version 2.1, November 2007, Publication No. 58/07. ISBN: 978-1-84726-559-3.
   Google Scholar
• FBI Laboratory (2005) Digital Imaging Guidelines. Photographic Operations & Imaging Services Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation.
   Google Scholar
• Benson PE, Shah AA, Willmot DR (2008) Polarized Versus Nonpolarized Digital Images for the Measurement of Demineralization Surrounding Orthodontic Brackets. Angle Orthodontist 78:2:288–293. doi: 10.2319/121306-511.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson AJ, Toumba KJ (1999) Cross-polarized photography in the study of enamel defects in dental paediatrics. Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine 22:2:63–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards N, (2011), Cross-polarisation, making it practical. J Vis Commun Med.; 34(4):165–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizova E, Kligman A (2001) New photographic techniques for clinical evaluation of acne. JEADV 15:3:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ortonne JP, Gupta G, Ortonne N, Duteil L, Queille C, Mallefet P (2009) Effectiveness of cross polarized light and fluorescence diagnosis for detection of sub-clinical and clinical actinic keratosis during imiquimod treatment. Experimental Dermatology1-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.01047.x
   Google Scholar
• Lawson Z, Nuttall D, Young S, Evans S, Maguire S, Dunstan F, Kemp A (2010) Which is the preferred image modality for paediatricians when assessing photographs of bruises in children? International Journal of Legal Medicine doi: 10.1007/s00414-010-0532-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raymond MA, Hall RL (1986) An interesting application of infra-red reflection photography to blood splash pattern interpretation. Forensic Science International31:189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng S, Grant A, Durkin A (2008) In vivo determination of skin near-infrared optical properties using diffuse optical spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics 13:1:014016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss TC, Warlen SC (1985) The Forensic Science Use of Reflective Ultraviolet Photography. Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA30:1:262–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David TJ, Sobel MN (1994) Recapturing a Five-Month-Old Bite Mark by Means of Reflective Ultraviolet Photography. Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA 39:6:1560–1567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• David TJ (1990) Documentation of a Seven Month Old Bite Mark with Ultraviolet Photography. Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Cincinnati, February 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Evans S et al. (2010) 3D imaging in forensic odontology. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine Vol. 33 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell SA, Taylor RV, Gordon I, Ogleby CL, Tanijiri T, Yoshino M et al. (2005) 3-D Imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks. International Journal of Legal Medicine 121(1):9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hyzer, and Krauss, (1998) The bite mark standard reference scale ABFO No. 2, Journal of Forensic Science. 33 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technologies (SWGIT) Version 1.2 June 2002. Forensic Science Communications Vol5 No. 1 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers and R J Johansen, (2000) Digital analysis of bite mark evidence (Using Adobe^® Photoshop^®) 1st Ed. USA. Forensic Imaging Services. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets HD, Bush MA (2010), Mathematical matching of a dentition to bitemarks: Use and evaluation of affine methods, Forensic Sci. Int. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman et al. (2005). Seven Hundred Seventy Eight Bite Marks: Analysis by Anatomic Location, Victim and Bitter Demographics, Type of Crime, and Legal Disposition. Journal of Forensic Science. 50(6).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J. Jason Payne-James, (2012) Rules and scales used in measurement in the forensic setting: measured—and found wanting!. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology. 8 (4) 482–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar