Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 81, 2010 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
1,057
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty

Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007

Per-Erik Johanson The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Anne Marie Fenstad The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
,
Ove Furnes The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Norway
,
Göran Garellick The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
,
Leif I Havelin The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Norway
,
Sören Overgaard The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinical Institute, Odense University Hospital, Odense; The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
,
Alma B Pedersen The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
&
Johan Kärrholm The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
 show all
Pages 535-541 | Received 02 Nov 2009, Accepted 24 May 2010, Published online: 04 Oct 2010

  • Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Dorey JD. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(4):481-9.
  • Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Annual Report 2008. www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr Accessed Feb 10 2010.
  • Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87:324-9.
  • Beaulé PE, Matar WY, Poitras P, Smit K, May, O. 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing. Clin Ortop 2009; (467) (1): 84-93.
  • Buergi ML, Walter WL. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The Australian experience. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 3) 2007; 22(7):61-5.
  • Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR). Hip and knee replacements in Canada. 2008-2009 Annual Report. www.cihi.ca/cjrr Accessed Feb 10 2010.
  • Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86(2):177-84.
  • Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B, Mitchell A, Skinner JA. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91(6):738-44.
  • Havelin LI, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Herberts P, Kärrholm J, Garellick G. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association. An unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(4):393-401.
  • Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M; Young DA, Dalziel RE, Shimmin AJ. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review if the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89(11):1431-8.
  • Kim PR, Beaule PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2008; 23 (6): 44-9.
  • Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2007. ISBN 978-91-977112-2-7. Göteborg 2008. www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed Feb 10 2010.
  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Dependency issues in survival analyzes of 55 782 primary hip replacements from 47 355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23(20):3227-40.
  • Long WT, Dastane M, Harris MJ, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Failure of the Durom Metasul® Acetabular Component. Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (2): 400-5.
  • Marker DR, Seyler MS, Jinnah RH, Delanois RE, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing. A prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 3) 2007; 22(7):66-71.
  • McBryde CW, Theivendran K, Thomas AM C, Treacy RB C, Pynsent PB. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Brimingham Hip Resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92(1):105-12.
  • McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in hip resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng (H) 2006; 220(2):239-51.
  • Mont MA, Seyler MS, Ulrich, SD, Beaule PE, Boyd HS, Grecula MJ, Goldberg VM, Kennedy WR, Marker DR, Schmalzried TP, Sparling EA, Vail TP, Amstutz HC. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2007; (465):63-70.
  • National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR England-Wales). 4th Annual Report 2007. www.njrcentre.org.uk Accessed Feb 10 2010.
  • National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR England-Wales). 6th Annual Report 2009. www.njrcentre.org.uk Accessed Feb 10 2010.
  • Nunley RM, Zhu J, Brooks PJ, Engh Jr CA, Raterman SJ, Rogerson JS, Barrack RL. The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (2): 382-91.
  • Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, Nolan J, Porteous MJ. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91(8):1025-30.
  • Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CLM, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90(7):847-51.
  • Pollard TCB, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88(5):592-600.
  • Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Miller LN. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. 12 093 replacements from the Australian Joint Registry. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1):66-71.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44 590 patients with 55 298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003; 4:1-4.
  • Schwarzer G, Schumacher M, Maurer TB, Ochsner PE. Statistical analysis of failure times in total joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54(10):997-1003.
  • Shimmin AJ, Beaulé PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008; 90:637-54.
  • Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2008; 90(3):21-6.
  • Treacy RBC, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87(2):167-70.
  • Vail TP, Mina CA, Yergler JD, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favourably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Ortop 2006; (453):123-31.
  • Witjes S, Smolders JMH, Beaulé PE, Pasker P, van Susante JLC. Learning from the learning curve in total hip resurfacing: a radiographic analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129(10):1293-9.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.