Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 82, 2011 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
1,106
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem

A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up

Mona Nysted Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University HospitalCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Pål Benum Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital; Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
,
Jomar Klaksvik Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital
,
Olav Foss Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital
&
Arild Aamodt Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital; Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Pages 410-416 | Received 26 Nov 2010, Accepted 26 Mar 2011, Published online: 14 Jun 2011

  • Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L, Learmonth ID, Passariello R. Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (3): 291-7.
  • Ang KC, Das De S, Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K. Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement. A prospective comparison of two different implant designs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1997; 79 (4): 675-9.
  • Bargar WL. Shape the implant to the patient. A rationale for the use of custom-fit cementless total hip implants. Clin Orthop 1989; (249): 73-8.
  • Benum P, Aamodt A. Uncemented custom femoral components in hip arthroplasty. A prospective clinical study of 191 hips followed for at least 7 years. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (4): 427-35.
  • Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 79-96.
  • Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (3): 479-83.
  • d'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Function al results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1954; 36 (3): 451-75.
  • Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; (231): 7-28.
  • Engh CA, Jr., Sychterz C, Engh C, Sr. Factors affecting femoral bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (5): 637-44.
  • Giannikas KA, Din R, Sadiq S, Dunningham TH. Medium-term results of the ABG total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (2): 184-8.
  • Grant P, Aamodt A, Falch JA, Nordsletten L. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Orthop Res 2005; 23 (6): 1280-5.
  • Herrera A, Canales V, Anderson J, Garcia-Araujo C, Murcia-Mazon A, Tonino AJ. Seven to 10 years followup of an anatomic hip prosthesis: an international study. Clin Orthop 2004; (423): 129-37.
  • Herrera A, Panisello JJ, Ibarz E, Cegonino J, Puertolas JA, Gracia L. Comparison between DEXA and finite element studies in the long-term bone remodeling of an anatomical femoral stem. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131 (4): 041013.
  • Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1989; 12 (9): 1255-67.
  • Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 124-34.
  • Karrholm J, Anderberg C, Snorrason F, Thanner J, Langeland N, Malchau H, Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84 (9): 1651-8.
  • Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992; 10 (6): 836-44.
  • Kiratli BJ, Checovich MM, McBeath AA, Wilson MA, Heiner JP. Measurement of bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with the Wisconsin hip, an uncemented femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11 (2): 184-93.
  • Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU. The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 2000; 24 (4): 184-90.
  • Leichtle UG, Leichtle CI, Schmidt B, Martini F. Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component. A five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88 (4): 467-71.
  • Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W. Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 1996; 20 (4): 218-21.
  • Panisello JJ, Canales V, Herrero L, Herrera A, Mateo J, Caballero MJ. Changes in periprosthetic bone remodelling after redesigning an anatomic cementless stem. Int Orthop 2009a; 33 (2): 373-9.
  • Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Canales V, Herrera A, Martinez AA, Mateo J. Long-term remodeling in proximal femur around a hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic stem: ten years densitometric follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009b; 24 (1): 56-64.
  • Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM, Tonino A, Fogelman I. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15 (4): 281-9.
  • Rogers A, Kulkarni R, Downes EM. The ABG hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis: one hundred consecutive operations with average 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (5): 619-25.
  • Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M. Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 1999; 23 (6): 325-9.
  • Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81 (1): 115-36.
  • Skoldenberg OG, Boden HS, Salemyr MO, Ahl TE, Adolphson PY. Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (3): 386-92.
  • Sumner DR, Galante JO. Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop 1992; (274): 202-12.
  • Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (5): 552-8.
  • Tonino AJ, Romanini L, Rossi P, Borroni M, Greco F, Garciaaraujo C, Hydroxyapatite-coated hip prostheses–Early results from an international study. Clin Orthop 1995; (312): 211-25.
  • Van der Wal BC, Rahmy AI, Grimm B, Blake GM, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ. The influence of implant design on periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented HA-coated hip stems. A two-year follow-up study using DEXA. Hip Int 2006; 16 (1): 8-17.
  • van der Wal BC, Rahmy A, Grimm B, Heyligers I, Tonino A. Preoperative bone quality as a factor in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis comparing bone remodelling between two implant types. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (1): 39-45.
  • Venesmaa PK, Kroger HP, Miettinen HJ, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16 (6): 1056-61.
  • Wixson RL, Stulberg SD, Van Flandern GJ, Puri L. Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (4): 365-72.
  • Zerahn B, Storgaard M, Johansen T, Olsen C, Lausten G, Kanstrup IL. Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 1998; 22 (4): 225-9.
  • Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Benum P, Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81 (1): 143-7.
  • Aamodt A, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Andersen E, Benum P, Husby OS. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83 (6): 921-9.
  • Østbyhaug PO, Klaksvik J, Romundstad P, Aamodt A. An in vitro study of the strain distribution in human femora with anatomical and customised femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (5): 676-82.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.