Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 82, 2011 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,098
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Similar TKA designs with differences in clinical outcome

A randomized, controlled trial of 77 knees with a mean follow-up of 6 years

Huub J MeijerinkDepartment of OrthopaedicsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Nico Verdonschot Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Laboratory for Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede
,
Corné JM van LoonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
,
Gerjon Hannink Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen
&
Maarten C de WaalMalefijtDepartment of Orthopaedics
Pages 685-691 | Received 22 Mar 2011, Accepted 11 Jul 2011, Published online: 09 Nov 2011

  • Barink M, Van de Groes S, Verdonschot N, De Waal Malefijt M. The difference in trochlear orientation between the natural knee and current prosthetic knee designs; towards a truly physiological prosthetic groove orientation. J Biomech 2006; 39: 1708-15.
  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40.
  • Boonstra MC, de Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N. How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? Knee 2008; 15: 390-5.
  • Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1993; 75: 674-81.
  • Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop 2005; [430]:117-24.
  • Brokelman RB, Meijerink HJ, de Boer CL, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, van Kamapen A. Are surgeons equally satisfied after total knee arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 331-3.
  • Choi WC, Lee S, Seong SC, Jung JH, Lee MC. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92: 2634-42.
  • Clarke HD, Hentz JG. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop 2008; (466): 2711-6.
  • Dalury DF, Barrett WP, Mason JB, Goldstein WM, Murphy JA, Roche MW. Midterm survival of a contemporary modular total knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1970 knees. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90: 1594-6.
  • Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989; [248]: 9-12.
  • Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, Liang MH, Tanzer M, Ferland D, Phillips C, Partridge AJ, Belisle P, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1722-8.
  • Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Belisle P, Liang MH, Ferland D, Phillips CB, Mahomed N, Tanzer M, Sledge C, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 3327-30.
  • Gobel D, Schultz W. Clinical results and economics of two primary total knee replacement systems implanted in standardised surgical technique. Z Orthop Unfall 2008; 146: 602-8.
  • Hanusch B, Lou TN, Warriner G, Hui A, Gregg P. Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 349-54.
  • Harrington MA, Hopkinson WJ, Hsu P, Manion L. Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: does it make a difference?--a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 24-7.
  • Harwin SF. Patellofemoral complications in symmetrical total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 753-62.
  • Healy WL, Wasilewski SA, Takei R, Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 197-201.
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989; [248]: 13-4.
  • Julin J, Jamsen E, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 413-9.
  • Kim YH, Choi Y, Kwon OR, Kim JS. Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2009; 91: 753-60.
  • Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92: 1911-20.
  • Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1273-9.
  • Manley MT, Stern LS, Gurtowski J. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 563-75.
  • Martucci E, Verni E, Del PG, Stulberg SD. CKS knee prosthesis: biomechanics and clinical results in 42 cases. Chir Organi Mov 1996; 81: 247-56.
  • McCalden RW, Macdonald SJ, Bourne RB, Marr JT. A randomized controlled trial comparing “high-flex” vs “standard” posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 33-8.
  • Mehin R, Burnett RS, Brasher PM. Does the new generation of high-flex knee prostheses improve the post-operative range of movement?: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92: 1429-34.
  • Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2005; 23: 1083-90.
  • Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2006; [452]: 35-43.
  • Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; [356] 39-46.
  • Ploegmakers MJ, Ginsel B, Meijerink HJ, de Rooy JW, de Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N, Banks SA. Physical examination and in vivo kinematics in two posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty designs. Knee 2010; 17: 204-9.
  • Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-8.
  • Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 224-8.
  • Rahman WA, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. Randomized controlled trial of radiographic and patient-assessed outcomes following fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 1201-8.
  • Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85: 259-65.
  • Ries MD. Effect of ACL sacrifice, retention, or substitution on kinematics after TKA. Orthopedics 2007; 30: 74-6.
  • Santini AJ, Raut V. Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty–a surgeon's first 99 replacements. Int Orthop 2008; 32: 459-65.
  • Schwartz AJ, la Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Galante JO. Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note. Clin Orthop 2010; (468): 2160-7.
  • Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 160-7.
  • Su FC, Lai KA, Hong WH. Rising from chair after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 1998; 13: 176-81.
  • Terwee CB, van der Slikke RM, van Lummel RC, Benink RJ, Meijers WG, de Vet HC. Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 724-31.
  • Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 2006; (452): 28-34.
  • Walsh WR, Svehla MJ, Russell J, Saito M, Nakashima T, Gillies RM, Bruce W, Hori R. Cemented fixation with PMMA or Bis-GMA resin hydroxyapatite cement: effect of implant surface roughness. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4929-34.
  • Waslewski GL, Marson BM, Benjamin JB. Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 763-7.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.