2,115
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Register studies

The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty

A study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hip replacements with 3 different cemented prostheses

, , &
Pages 559-565 | Received 18 Mar 2012, Accepted 09 Aug 2012, Published online: 01 Nov 2012

  • Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty–does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (6): 719-29.
  • Baker AS, Bitounis VC. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71 (1): 47-50.
  • Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11 (2): 89-99.
  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74 (5): 514-24.
  • Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop 2011; (469) (2): 319-29.
  • Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Colclough K, Howard PW. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (3): 215-20.
  • Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Tidermark J, Pettersson H, Ponzer S, Lapidus LJ. Dislocation of total hip replacement in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (2): 184-9.
  • Gammer W. A modified lateroanterior approach in operations for hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1985; (199): 169-72.
  • Garellick G, Malchau H, Regner H, Herberts P. The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: radiographic evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (4): 414-25.
  • Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Survival of hip replacements. A comparison of a randomized trial and a registry. Clin Orthop 2000; (375): 157-67.
  • Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty, Annual Report 2008. http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2008-EN.sflb.ashx.
  • Hook S, Moulder E, Yates PJ, Burston BJ, Whitley E, Bannister GC. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88 (12): 1584-90.
  • Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3: CD003828.
  • Karrholm J. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se). Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 3-4.
  • Kennedy JG, Rogers WB, Soffe KE, Sullivan RJ, Griffen DG, Sheehan LJ. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (5): 530-4.
  • Lewthwaite SC, Squires B, Gie GA, Timperley AJ, Ling RS. The Exeter Universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10-17 years’ followup. Clin Orthop 2008; 466 (2): 324-31.
  • Macpherson GJ, Hank C, Schneider M, Trayner M, Elton R, Howie CR, Breusch SJ. The posterior approach reduces the risk of thin cement mantles with a straight femoral stem design. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (3): 292-5.
  • Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop 2002; (405): 46-53.
  • Moore AT. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1957; 39 (4): 811-27.
  • Morrey BF. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23 (2): 237-48.
  • Palan J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Andrew JG, Nolan J. Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior? Clin Orthop 2009; (467) (2): 473-7.
  • Schmalzried TP, Guttmann D, Grecula M, Amstutz HC. The relationship between the design, position, and articular wear of acetabular components inserted without cement and the development of pelvic osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1994; 76 (5): 677-88.
  • Thien TM, Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (4): 407-12.
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370 (9596): 1453-7.
  • Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64 (9): 1295-306.