Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 3
Journal homepage
956
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and femur

Excellent results with the cemented Lubinus SP II 130-mm femoral stem at 10 years of follow-up

932 hips followed for 5–15 years

Wybren PrinsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle
,
Remco MeijerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle
,
Boudewijn J KollenDepartment of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
,
Cees CPM VerheyenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle
&
Harmen B EttemaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Isala Klinieken, ZwolleCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 276-279 | Received 13 Sep 2013, Accepted 07 Jan 2014, Published online: 03 Apr 2014

  • Annaratone G, Surace FM, Salerno P, Regis GF. Survival analysis of the cemented SP II stem. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2000; 1: 41-5.
  • Arno S, Fetto J, Nguyen NQ, Kinariwala N, Takemoto R, Oh C, Walker PS. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27 (7): 680-5.
  • Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Kreutzer J, Brocai D, Gruen TA. Dependency of cement mantle thickness on femoral stem design and centralizer. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (5): 648-57.
  • Catani F, Ensini A, Leardini A, Bragonzoni L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Giannini S. Migration of cemented stem and restrictor after total hip arthroplasty: A radiostereometry study of 25 patients with lubinus SP II stem. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (2): 244-9.
  • Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH. What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: Minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop 2011; (469) (1): 209-17.
  • Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the norwegian arthroplasty register: Concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (4): 402-12.
  • Goosen JH, Swieringa AJ, Keet JG, Verheyen CC. Excellent results from proximally HA-coated femoral stems with a minimum of 6 years follow-up: A prospective evaluation of 100 patients. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (2): 190-7.
  • Hailer NP, Garellick G, Karrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the swedish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 34-41.
  • Janssen D, van Aken J, Scheerlinck T, Verdonschot N. Finite element analysis of the effect of cementing concepts on implant stability and cement fatigue failure. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (3): 319-24.
  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23 (20): 3227-40.
  • Lubinus P, Klauser W, Schwantes B, Eberle R. Cemented total hip arthroplasty: The SP-II femoral component. GIOT 2002; 28: 221-6.
  • Makela K, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: Results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the finnish arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (12): 1562-9.
  • Perez MA, Palacios J. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38 (6): 2093-106.
  • Prokopetz JJ, Losina E, Bliss RL, Wright J, Baron JA, Katz JN. Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 251.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national swedish knee arthroplasty register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1.
  • Stolk J, Janssen D, Huiskes R, Verdonschot N. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants. Clin Orthop 2007; (456): 138-47.
  • Swedish register database. 2013; personal communication: http://www.shpr.se/en/.
  • Thien TM, Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (4): 407-12.
  • Waanders D, Janssen D, Mann KA, Verdonschot N. The behavior of the micro-mechanical cement-bone interface affects the cement failure in total hip replacement. J Biomech 2011; 44 (2): 228-34.
  • Wierer T, Forst R, Mueller LA, Sesselmann S. Radiostereometric migration analysis of the lubinus SP II hip stem: 59 hips followed for 2 years. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2013; 58 (4): 333-41.
  • Visuri T, Turula KB, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J. Survivorship of hip prosthesis in primary arthrosis: Influence of bilaterality and interoperative time in 45,000 hip prostheses from the finnish endoprosthesis register. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73 (3): 287-90.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.