Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 5
Journal homepage
2,342
Views
80
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and knee

Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty

A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1–3 years after surgery

Einar AmlieLovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, OsloCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Leif I HavelinDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen;The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
,
Ove FurnesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen;The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
,
Valborg BasteThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
,
Lars NordslettenOslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
,
Oystein HovikLovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Oslo
&
Sigbjorn DimmenLovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Oslo;Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
 show all
Pages 463-469 | Received 29 Aug 2013, Accepted 13 Apr 2014, Published online: 23 Jun 2014

  • Amlie E, Hovik O, Reikeras O. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head. J Orthop Traumatol 2010; 11 (2): 111-5.
  • Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Prosthesis survival after total hip arthroplasty—does surgical approach matter? Analysis of 19,304 Charnley and 6,002 Exeter primary total hip arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (6): 719-29.
  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1988; 1: 95-108.
  • Bistolfi A, Crova M, Rosso F, Titolo P, Ventura S, Massazza G. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36 mm versus 28 mm femoral heads. Hip Int 2011; 21 (5): 559-64.
  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74 (5): 514-24.
  • Callary SA, Field JR, Campbell DG. Low wear of a second-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene liner: a 5-year radiostereometric analysis study. Clin Orthop 2013; (471) (11): 3596-600.
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990; 16 (3): 199-208.
  • Greidanus NV, Chihab S, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Tanzer M, Gross AE, Duncan CP. Outcomes of minimally invasive anterolateral THA are not superior to those of minimally invasive direct lateral and posterolateral THA. Clin Orthop 2013; (471) (2): 463-71.
  • Greiner W, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, Oppe S, Badia X, Busschbach J, Buxton M, Dolan P, Kind P, Krabbe P, Ohinmaa A, Parkin D, Roset M, Sintonen H, Tsuchiya A, de CF. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study. Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4 (3): 222-31.
  • Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1982; 64 (1): 17-9.
  • Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 337-53.
  • Hedlundh U, Hybbinette CH, Fredin H. Influence of surgical approach on dislocations after Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (5): 609-14.
  • Ho KW, Whitwell GS, Young SK. Reducing the rate of early primary hip dislocation by combining a change in surgical technique and an increase in femoral head diameter to 36 mm. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012; 132 (7): 1031-6.
  • Jansson KA, Granath F. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (1): 82-9.
  • Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3: CD003828.
  • Judet J, Judet R. The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1950; 32 (2): 166-73.
  • Khan T, Knowles D. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve during the direct lateral approach to the hip: a cadaveric study. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (8): 1198-200.
  • Leonardsson O, Rolfson O, Hommel A, Garellick G, Akesson K, Rogmark C. Patient-reported outcome after displaced femoral neck fracture: a national survey of 4467 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2013; 95 (18): 1693-9.
  • Lindgren V, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (6): 559-65.
  • Lygre S HL, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Vollset SE. Pain and function in patients after primary unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2010; 92 (18): 2890-7.
  • Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
  • Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2012. http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/eng/Report_2012.pdf.
  • Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (6): 801-8.
  • Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop 1998; (355): 224-8.
  • Picado CH, Garcia FL, Marques W Jr. Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop 2007; (455): 209-11.
  • Queen RM, Butler RJ, Watters TS, Kelley SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics. J Arthroplasty (6 Suppl) 2011; 26: 66-71.
  • Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, Greiz ML, Deshmane PP, Hepinstall MS, Ranawat AS. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop 2014: (472) (2): 455-63.
  • Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2011; 93: 66-71.
  • Shaw JA. Experience with a modified posterior approach to the hip joint. A technical note. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6 (1): 11-8.
  • Smith AJ, Wylde V, Berstock JR, Maclean AD, Blom AW. Surgical approach and patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement. Hip Int 2012; 22 (4): 355-61.
  • Smith-Petersen MN. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1949; 31 (1): 40-6.
  • Spaans AJ, van den Hout JA, Bolder SB. High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (4): 342-6.
  • Watson-Jones R. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Br J -Surg 1936; 23 (92): 787-808.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.