8,033
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty

A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 22-28 | Received 13 Feb 2015, Accepted 04 Jun 2015, Published online: 03 Jul 2015

  • Baker AS, Bitounis VC. Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71 (1): 47–50.
  • Berend KR, Lombardi AVJr, Seng BE, Adams JB, Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 Suppl 6: 107–20.
  • Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS, Haleem-Smith H, Tuan RS, Unger AS. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (15): 1392–8.
  • Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Geller JA, Greene ME, Freiberg AA, Harris WH, Malchau H. Minimum 6-year followup of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 465: 122–7.
  • Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101 (1): 17–24.
  • Brooks PJ. Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11 Suppl A): 67–9.
  • Bystrom S, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74 (5): 514–24.
  • Christensen CP, Karthikeyan T, Jacobs CA. Greater prevalence of wound complications requiring reoperation with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9): 1839–41.
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Haukeland University Hospital. http://nrlweb.ihelse.net/Rapporter/Rapport2014.pdf.
  • Downing ND, Clark DI, Hutchinson JW, Colclough K, Howard PW. Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (3): 215–20.
  • Edmunds CT, Boscainos PJ. Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris Hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test. A retrospective analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9 (3): 124–9.
  • Gibson A. Posterior exposure of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1950; 32-b (2): 183–6.
  • Graw BP, Woolson ST, Huddleston HG, Goodman SB, Huddleston JI. Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (9): 2372–6.
  • Gulati A, Dwyer AJ, Shardlow DL. The impact of posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on early complications. Acta Orthop Belg 2008; 74 (2): 200–5.
  • Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64 (1): 17–9.
  • Holm B, Thorborg K, Husted H, Kehlet H, Bandholm T. Surgery-induced changes and early recovery of hip-muscle strength, leg-press power, and functional performance after fast-track total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource] 2013; 8 (4): e62109.
  • Husby VS, Helgerud J, Bjørgen S, Husby OS, Hoff J. Early maximal strength training is an efficienet treatment for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90 (10): 1658–67.
  • Johnston JJ, Noble PC, Hurwitz DE, Andriacchi TP. Biomechanics of the Hip. In: The Adult Hip, Vol. 1. Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE ( eds). Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA 2007.
  • Kortebein P, Symons TB, Ferrando A, Paddon-Jones D, Ronsen O, Protas E, Conger S, Lombeida J, Wolfe R, Evans WJ. Functional impact of 10 days of bed rest in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008; 63 (10): 1076–81.
  • Lindgren V, Garellick G, Karrholm J, Wretenberg P. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (6): 559–65.
  • Lombardi AVJr, Skeels MD, Berend KR, Adams JB, Franchi OJ, Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469 (6): 1547–53.
  • Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (405): 46-53.
  • McGuire DK, Levine BD, Williamson JW, Snell PG, Blomqvist CG, Saltin B, Mitchell JH. A 30-year follow-up of the Dallas Bedrest and Training Study: I. Effect of age on the cardiovascular response to exercise. Circulation 2001; 104 (12): 1350–7.
  • Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ. Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 293-8.
  • Poehling-Monaghan KL, Kamath AF, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (2): 623–31.
  • Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (5): 671–9. e1.
  • Sicard-Rosenbaum L, Light KE, Behrman AL. Gait, lower extremity strength, and self-assessed mobility after hip arthroplasty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57 (1): M47–51.
  • Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (2): 173–84.
  • Suesada MM, Martins MA, Carvalho CR. Effect of short-term hospitalization on functional capacity in patients not restricted to bed. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86 (6): 455–62.
  • Suh KT, Park BG, Choi YJ. A posterior approach to primary total hip arthroplasty with soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418): 162–7.
  • Suter E, Herzog W, Leonard TR, Nguyen H. One-year changes in hind limb kinematics, ground reaction forces and knee stability in an experimental model of osteoarthritis. J Biomech 1998; 31 (6): 511–7.
  • Talis VL, Grishin AA, Solopova IA, Oskanyan TL, Belenky VE, Ivanenko YP. Asymmetric leg loading during sit-to-stand, walking and quiet standing in patients after unilateral total hip replacement surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol. Avon) 2008; 23 (4): 424–33.
  • Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Li JS, Woo Nam K, Li G, Kwon YM. Asymmetric hip kinematics during gait in patients with unilateral total hip arthroplasty: in vivo 3-dimensional motion analysis. J Biomech 2015; 48 (4): 555–9.
  • van Stralen GM, Struben PJ, van Loon CJ. The incidence of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty using posterior approach with posterior soft-tissue repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123 (5): 219–22.
  • Verdijk LB, van Loon L, Meijer K, Savelberg HH. One-repetition maximum strength test represents a valid means to assess leg strength in vivo in humans. J Sports Sci 2009; 27 (1): 59–68.
  • Winther SB, Foss OA, Wik TS, Davis SP, Engdal M, Jessen V, Husby OS. 1-year follow-up of 920 hip and knee arthroplasty patients after implementing fast-track. Acta Orthop 2015; 86(1): 78–85.
  • Witzleb WC, Stephan L, Krummenauer F, Neuke A, Gunther KP. Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty - A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Med Res 2009; 14 (6): 256–63.
  • Wojciechowski P, Kusz D, Kopec K, Borowski M. Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007; 9 (1): 1–7.