- Bridgewater B. Patient-facing data is essential in the digital era. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2015; 97 (4): 160–3.
- Clement R, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha T, Chen J, Davies M, et al. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (5): 523–33.
- Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998; 23 (18): 2003–13.
- . Deyo R, Dworkin S, Amtmann D, Andersson G, Borenstein D, Carragee E, et al.Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Spine 2014; 39 (14): 1128–43.
- Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Murray D. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: Re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010; 92 (12): 1628–31.
- Gottlieb G. Outcomes data: the road to expansion and enhancement. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2015; 97 (4): 164–5.
- Huskisson E. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2 (7889): 1127–31.
- MacFie J. FSSA statement on individual surgeons’ outcomes data. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2015; 97 (5): 214–5.
- Moojen W, Arts M, Jacobs W, van Zwet E, van den Akker-van Marle M, Koes B, et al. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2013; 347: f6415
- Porter M, Lee T. The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review 2013; 91 (10): 50–70.
- Robertsson O, Graves S, Hooper G, Lidgren L, Rothwell A, de Steiger R. Letter: A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure (A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: Re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J. W. Goodfellow, J. J. O’Connor, and D. W. Murray J Bone Joint Surg Br December 2010 92-B:1628-1631.). J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93–B.
- Scott J, Huskisson E. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2 (2): 175–84.
- Scott J, Huskisson E. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1979; 38: 560.
- Stromqvist B, Berg S, Gerdhem P, Johnsson R, Moller A, Sahlstrand T, et al. X-Stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine 2013; 38 (17): 1436–42.
- van Hooff M, Jacobs W, Willems P, Wouters M, de Kleuver M, Peul W, et al. Evidence and practice in spine registries: A systematic review, and recommendations for future design of registries. Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (5): 534–44.
- Vos T, Flaxman A, Naghav IM, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Global Health; Public Health Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380 (9859): 2163–96.
- Westaby S, Baig K, Pepper J. Publishing SSMD: the risks outweigh the benefits. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2015a; 97 (4): 155–9.
- Westaby S, Baig K, Pepper J. SSMD: and another thing. Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 2015b; 97 (5): 212–3.
- Williams C, Maher C, Hancockb M, McAuleyc J, Chung-Wei C, Latimer J. Recruitment rate for a clinical trial was associated with particular operational procedures and clinician characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 169–75.
Acta Orthopaedica
Volume 86, 2015 - Issue 5
Open access
807
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Guest editorial
Spinal disorders, quality-based healthcare and spinal registers
Jeremy FairbankProfessor of Spine Surgery, University of Oxford, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 521-522
|
Published online: 13 Jul 2015
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.