3,507
Views
110
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength

A prospective cohort study of 222 patients

, , , &
Pages 36-41 | Received 16 May 2015, Accepted 17 Aug 2015, Published online: 16 Oct 2015

  • Asayama I, Chammongkich S, Simpson K J, Kinsey T L, Mahoney O M. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 414-20.
  • Barbier O, Ollat D, Versier G. Interest of an intraoperative limb length and offset measurement device in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98(4): 398-404.
  • Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patient with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15(12): 1833-40.
  • Cassidy K A, Noticewala MS, Macaulay W, Lee J H, Geller J A. Effect of femoral offset on pain and function after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(10): 1863–9.
  • Charles M N, Bourne R B, Davey J R, Greenwald A S, Morrey B F, Rorabeck C H. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 2005; 54: 131-41.
  • Dastane M, Dorr L D, Tarwala R, Wan Z. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(2): 429-36.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83(8): 1125-9.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 2009; 41: 1149-60.
  • Frank E D, Long B W, Smith B J. 329 Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning & procedures, 11th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby\Elsevier; 2007.
  • Garbuz D S, Xu M, Sayre E C. Patients’ outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(7): 998-1004.
  • Kjellberg M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor A S. A new radiographic method of measuring femoral offset. The Sundsvall method. Hip Int 2009; 19(4): 377-81.
  • Kiyama T, Natio M, Shinoda T, Maeyama A. Hip abductor strengths after total hip arthroplasty via the lateral and posterolateral approaches. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(1): 76-80.
  • Kurtz W B, Ecker T M, Reichmann W M, Murphy S B. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 624–34.
  • Lecerf G, Fessy M H, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, Girard J, Mertl P, Marchetti E, Stindel E. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95: 210–9.
  • Liebs T R, Nasser L, Herzberg W, Rüther W, Hassenpflug J. The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B(1): 36-42.
  • Little N J, Busch C A, Gallagher J A, Rorabeck C H, Bourne R B. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2895-900.
  • Loughead J M, Chesney D, Holland J P, McCaskie A W. Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87(2): 163-6.
  • Mahmood S S, Al-Amir B, Mukka S S, Baea S S, Sayed-Noor A S. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of plain radiographic measurements after total hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44(3): 345-51.
  • Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr L D. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(8): 1932-42.
  • Marx R G, Jones E C, Atwan N C. Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87(9): 1999-2005.
  • McGrory B J, Morrey B F, Cahalan T D, An K N, Cabanela M E. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductormuscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 865-9.
  • Merle C, Waldstein W, Pegg E C, Streit M R, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger P R, Murray D W, Gill H S. Prediction of three-dimensional femoral offset from AP pelvis radiographs in primary hip osteoarthritis. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82(8): 1278-85.
  • Pasquier G, Ducharne G, Ali E S, Giraud F, Mouttet A, Durante E. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96(4): 367-75.
  • Patel S R, Toms A P, Rehman J M, Wimhurst J. A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 21(93): 1712-9.
  • Renkawitz T, Sendtner E, Schuster T, Weber M, Grifka J, Woerner M. Femoral pinless length and offset measurements during computer-assisted, minimally invasive total hiparthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(5): 1021-5.
  • Sakalkale D P, Sharkey P F, Eng K, Hozack W J, Rothman R H. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 388: 125-34.
  • Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catone Y. Three-dimensional hip anatomy in osteoarthritis. Analysis of the femoral offset. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24(6): 990-7.
  • Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(2): 123-7.
  • Shrier I, Platt R W. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 70.