1,025
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Similar effect of stem geometry on radiological changes with 2 types of cemented straight stem

The Müller stem and the Virtec stem compared in 711 hips

, , , &
Pages 120-125 | Received 07 Jan 2015, Accepted 10 Sep 2015, Published online: 16 Oct 2015

  • Anthony P P, Gie G A, Howie C R, Ling R S. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72(6): 971-9.
  • Bartlett G E, Beard D J, Murray D W, Gill H S. In vitro comparison of the effects of rough and polished stem surface finish on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009; 80(2): 144-9.
  • Breusch S J. The optimal cement mantle. In: The Well-Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty. (Ed Breusch SJ, Malchau H). Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 125–40.
  • Buckwalter A E, Callaghan J J, Liu S S, Pedersen D R, Goetz D D, Sullivan P M, Leinen J A, Johnston R C. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(7): 1481-5.
  • Clauss M, Luem M, Ochsner P E, Ilchmann T. Fixation and loosening of the cemented Muller straight stem: a long-term clinical and radiological review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(9): 1158-63.
  • Clauss M, Ilchmann T, Zimmermann P, Ochsner P E. The histology around the cemented Muller straight stem: A post-mortem analysis of eight well-fixed stems with a mean follow-up of 12.1 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(11): 1515-21.
  • Clauss M, Gersbach S, Butscher A, Ilchmann T. Risk factors for aseptic loosening of Muller-type straight stems: a registry-based analysis of 828 consecutive cases with a minimum follow-up of 16 years. Acta Orthop 2013; 84(4): 353-9.
  • El Masri F, Kerboull L, Kerboull M, Courpied J P, Hamadouche M. Is the so-called ‘French paradox’ a reality?: long-term survival and migration of the Charnley-Kerboull stem cemented line-to-line. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(3): 342-8.
  • Ellison P. Theoretical relationships between component design, patient bone geometry and range-of-motion post hip resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2012; 226(3): 246-55.
  • Fowler J L, Gie G A, Lee A J, Ling R S. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19(3): 477-89.
  • Hallan G, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Wangen H, Hol P J, Ellison P, Havelin L I. Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem? 10,108 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2012; 83(1): 1-6.
  • Hamadouche M, Baque F, Lefevre N, Kerboull M. Minimum 10-year survival of Kerboull cemented stems according to surface finish. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466(2): 332-9.
  • Harris W H, McCarthy J C, Jr, O’Neill D A. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64(7): 1063-7.
  • Herberts P, Malchau H, Garellick G. Annual Report 2003. The Swedish Natioinal Hip Arthoplasty Register. www.shpr.se; 2004.
  • Howie D W, Middleton R G, Costi K. Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(4): 573-6.
  • Joshi R P, Eftekhar N S, McMahon D J, Nercessian O A. Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of 2 matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(4): 585-90.
  • Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76(6): 912-7.
  • Kerboul M. The Charnley-Kerboul prosthesis. In: Total hip replacement. (Eds. Postel M, Kerboul M, Evradr J, Courpied J P). Heidelberg: Springer; 1987. p. 13–7.
  • Kerboull L, Hamadouche M, Courpied J P, Kerboull M. Long-term results of Charnley-Kerboull hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418): 112-8.
  • Langlais F, Kerboull M, Sedel L, Ling R S. The ‘French paradox.’. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85(1): 17-20.
  • Morscher E W, Berli B, Clauss M, Grappiolo G. Outcomes of the MS-30 cemented femoral stem. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2005; 72(3): 153-9.
  • Prins W, Meijer R, Kollen B J, Verheyen C C, Ettema H B. Excellent results with the cemented Lubinus SP II 130-mm femoral stem at 10 years of follow-up: 932 hips followed for 5-15 years. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(3): 276-9.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1.
  • Rud-Sorensen C, Pedersen A B, Johnsen S P, Riis A H, Overgaard S. Survival of primary total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(1): 60-5.
  • Scheerlinck T, Casteleyn P P. The design features of cemented femoral hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(11): 1409-18.
  • Scott G, Freeman M, Kerboull M. Femoral components: The French paradox. In: The well-cemented total hip arthoplasty. (Eds. Breusch S J, Malchau H). Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 249–53.
  • Thien T M, Karrholm J. Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems. Acta Orthop 2010; 81(4): 407-12.
  • Young L, Duckett S, Dunn A. The use of the cemented Exeter Universal femoral stem in a District General Hospital: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(2): 170-5.