Femoral remodeling after arthroplasty of the hip: Prospective randomized 5-year comparison of 120 cemented/uncemented cases of arthrosis

References

• Amstutz H. C., Nasser S., More R. C., Kabo J. M. The anthropometric total hip femoral prosthesis. Preliminary clinical and roentgenographic findings of exact-fit cementless application. Clin Orthop 1989; 242: 104–19
   Google Scholar
• Bobyn J. D., Glassman A. H., Goto H., Krygier J. J., Miller J. E., Brooks C. E. The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1990; 261: 196–213
   Google Scholar
• Brooker A. F., Bowerman J. W., Robinson R. A., Riley L. H., Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1973; 55(8)1629–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown I. W., Ring P. A. Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985; 67(2)218–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charnley J., Cupic Z. The nine-and ten-year results of the low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 1973; 95: 9–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comadoll J. L., Sherman R. E., Gustilo R. B., Bechtold J. E. Radiographic changes in bone dimensions in asymptomatic cemented total hip arthroplasties. Results of nine-to thirteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70(3)433–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engh C. A., Bobyn J. D., Glassman A. H. Porous coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(1)45–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engh C. A., Massin P., Suthers K. E. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990; 257: 107–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galante J. O., Lemons J., Spector M., Wilson P. D., Jr., Wright T. M. The biologic effects of implant materials. J Orthop Res 1991; 9(5)760–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1982; 64(1)17–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris W. H. Will stress-shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1992; 274: 120–3
   Google Scholar
• Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 1990; 261: 27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R., Weinans H., Dalstra M. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1989; 12(9)1255–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki K. Remodeling of the femoral shaft after Charnley total hip replacement. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1987; 61(7)869–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasty M., Maloney W. J., Bragdon C. R., Haire T., Harris W. H. Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well-fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(8)1220–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilgus D. J., Shirnaoka E. E., Tripton J. S., Eberle R. W. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. Methods and preliminary results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75(3)279–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim Y. H., Kim V. E. Results of the Harris Galante cementless hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992; 74(1)83–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Küsswetter H., Gabriel E., Stuhler T., Töpfer L. Remodeling of femur in conventionally-implanted hip prostheses. Cementless Fixation of Hip Prostheses, E. Morscher. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1984; 17–20
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J. L., Askew M. J., Wixson R. L., Kramer G. M., Tarr R. R. The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66(2)280–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintner F., Zweymüller K., Bohm G., Brand G. Reactions of surrounding tissue to the cementless hip implant Ti-6A1–4V after an implantation period of several years. Autopsy studies in three cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1988; 107(6)357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maistrelli G. L., Fornasier V., Binnington A., McKenzie K., Sessa V., Harrington I. Effect of stem modulus in a total hip arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73(1)43–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maloney W. J., Jasty M., Harris W. H., Galante J. O., Callaghan J. J. Endosteal erosion in association with stable uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(7)1025–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maloney W. J., Krushell R. J., Jasty M., Harris W. H. Incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement: effect of the type of fixation of the femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73(2)191–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy C. K., Steinberg G. G., Agren M., Leahey D., Wyman E., Baran D. T. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73(6)774–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merle d'Aubigné R., Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1954; 36(3)451–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor O., Harris W. H. The paradox of femoral stress shielding: Cemented versus cementless femoral components. Proc 38th Ann Meet Orthop Res Soc. Washington, DC 1992; 295
   Google Scholar
• Oh I., Harris W. H. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1978; 60(1)75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips T. W., Messieh S. S., McDonald P. D. Femoral stem fixation in hip replacement. A biomechanical comparison of cementless and cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72(3)431–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poss R. Natural factors that affect the shape and strength of the aging human femur. Clin Orthop 1992; 274: 194–201
   Google Scholar
• Ritter M. A., Fechtman R. W. Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3(2)117–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg A. Cementless total hip arthroplasty: femoral remodeling and clinical experience. Orthopedics 1989; 12(9)1223–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner D. R., Turner T. M., Urban R. M., Galante J. O. Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip arthroplasty model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74(2)239–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas B. J., Salvati E. A., Small R. D. The CAD hip arthroplasty. Five-to ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68(5)640–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torchia M. E., Ruff C. B. A quantitative assessment of cross-sectional cortical bone remodeling in the femoral diaphysis following hip arthroplasty in elderly females. J Orthop Res 1990; 8(6)883–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West J. D., Mayor M. B., Collier J. P. Potential errors inherent in quantitative densitometric analysis of orthopaedic radiographs. A study after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69(1)58–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zweymiiller K. A., Lintner F. K., Semlitsch M. F. Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis. Clin Orthop 1988; 235: 195–206
   Google Scholar