References
- Bobyn J D, Classman A H, Goto H, Krygier J J, Miller J E, Brooks C E. The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop I'M, 261: 196–213
- Chan D, Carter S R, Grimer R J, Snealh R S. Endopros-Ihelic replacement for bony metastases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1992; 74(1)13–8
- Comadoll J L, Sherman R E, Gustilo R B, Bechtold J E. Radiographic changes in bone dimensions in asymptomatic cemented total hip arthroplasties. Results of nine to thirteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1988; 70(3)433–8
- Courpied J P, Tomeno B. Total massive hip prosthesis for tumors of upper femur. Analysis of twenty cases. New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Tumors, T Yamamuro. Springer Verlag, Tokyo 1989; 413–7
- Dobbs H S, Scales J T, Wilson J N, Kemp H B, Burrows H J, Sneath R S. Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur and acetabulum. A survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1981; 63 B(2)219–24
- Engh C A, Bobyn J D, Classman A H. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress-shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69(I)45–55
- Jasty M, Maloney W J, Bragdon C R, Haire T, Harris W H. Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72(8)1220–9
- Johnson M E, Mankin H J. Reconstructions after reseciions of tumors involving the proximal femur. Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22(I)87–103
- Johnsson R, Carlsson A, Kisch K, Moritz U, Zctterstrom R, Persson B M. Function following mega lotal hip arthroplasty compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty and healthy matched controls. Clin Orthop 1985; 192: 159–67
- Katzner M, Schvingt E. Elude de 100 arthroplasties totales de hanche avec megaprolhese femorale realisees apres resection etendue de 1'extrcmite superieure eki lemur. Hit Orthop 1982; 6(4)233–2
- Khong K S, Chao E Y S, Sim E H. Long-term performance of custom prosthetic replacement of neoplastic disease of the proximal femur. New Developments for Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Tumors, T Yamamuro. Springer Verlag, Tokyo 1989; 403–11
- Lewis M M, Chekolsky K M. Proximal femur replacement for neoplastic disease. Clin Orthop 1982; 171: 72–9
- McCarthy C K, Steinberg C G, Agren Leahey M, Wyman E, Baran D T. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73(6)774–8
- Scales J T. Massive bone and joint replacement involving the upper femur, acetabulum, and iliac bone. The Hip: Proc Third Open Scient Meet Hip Soc. C V Mosby., St Louis 1975; 245–75
- Toni A, Sudanese A, Capanna R, Guerra A, Ciunli A, Cam panacci M. Custom-made prosthesis.: The Italian experience. Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Oncology, W F Enneking. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1987; 207–10
- Veth R P, Nielsen H K, Oldhoff J, Schral Tordt Koops H, Mehta D, Oosterhuis J W, Kamps W A, Goeken I. N. Megaprosthescs in the treatment of primary malignant and metastatic tumors in the hip region. J Surg Oncol 1989; 40(3)214–8