Radiographic risk signs for loosening after cemented THA:61 loose stems and 23 loose sockets compared with 42 controls

References

• Ahnfelt L, Herberts P, Malchau H, Andersson G B J. Prognosis of total hip replacement. A Swedish multicenter study of 4,664 revisions. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61, (Suppl 238)
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson Å S. Mechanical failure of total hip replacement. Thesis. Malmö, Sweden 1980
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson Å S., Gentz C-F. Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1980; 147: 262–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler P H., Reineck F T., Wixson R L., McCarthy J C. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1981; 63: 1426–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: Theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1979
   Google Scholar
• DeLee J G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976; 121: 20–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dom L D., Kane T J, 3rd, Conaty J P. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger. A 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 453–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruen T A., McNiece G M., Amstutz H C. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustilo R B., Pasternak H S. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop 1988; 235: 111–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris W H., Penenburg B L. Further follow-up on socket fixation with a metal-backed acetabular component for total hip replacement. A minimum ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69: 1140–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris W H., McCarthy J C., O'Neill D A. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 1163–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herberts P. Hip arthroplasty revision. Guest editorial. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63(2)109–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson J P., Shelley P, Wroblewski B M. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Chamley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 1988; 228: 105–9
   Google Scholar
• Ilchmann T, Franzén H, Mjöberg B, Wingstrand H. Measurement accuracy in acetabular cup migration. A comparison of four radiological methods versus stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 1992; 7: 121–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasty M, Maloney W J., Bragdon C R., Haire T, Harris W H. Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 1220–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Aeta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 491–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Snorrason F. Subsidence, hump and tip micro-movements of non-coated ribbed femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop 1993; 273: 50–60
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4–7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 912–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loudon J R., Charnley J. Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1980; 62(4)450–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 497–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh C. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 245–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miniaci A, Bailey W H., Bourne R B., McLaren A C., Rorabeck C H. Analysis of radionuclide arthrograms, radiographic arthrograms and sequential plain radiographs in the assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 143–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjöberg B, Selvik G, Hansson L I., Rosenquist R, Önnerfelt R. Mechanical loosening of total hip prostheses: a radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1986; 68: 770–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn D, Freeman M A R, Hill P F., Evans S J W. The measurement of migration of the acetabular component of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1989; 71: 629–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco V, Shelley P, Wroblewski B M. Mechanical loosening of the stem in Charnley arthroplasties. Identification of the “at risk” factors. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1988; 70: 596–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryd L. Micromotion in knee arthroplasty: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of tibial component fixation. Acta Orthop Scand 1986, (Suppl 220)
   Google Scholar
• Ryd L, Albrektsson B E J, Carlsson L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Herberts P, Lindstrand A. On the clinical significance of micromotion of joint implants. 39th Annual Meeting, Orthopedic Research Society, San Francisco, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Schmalzried T, Jasty M, Harris W H. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992a; 74: 849–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzried T P., Kwong L M., Jasty M, Sedlacek R C., Haire T C., O'Conner D O., Bragdon C R., Kabo J M., Malcolm A J., Harris W H. The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 1992b; 274: 60–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snorrason F, Kärrholm J. Early loosening of revision hip arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 217–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strömberg C N., Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3: 47–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strömberg C N., Herberts P, Palmertz B. Cemented revision hip arthroplasty. A multi-center 5–9 year study of 204 first revisions for loosening. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 111–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffer R N. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement, with particular reference to roentgenographic loosening of the components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 983–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland C J., Wilde A H., Borden L S., Marks K E. A ten-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Müller curved stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 970–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanner J, Freij-Larsson C, Kärrholm J, Malchau H, Wesslén B. Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 207–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White S H. The fate of cemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Clin Orthop 1988; 231: 29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar