Prognosis and high-risk complication identification in unselected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

References

• De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Marino P. Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An overview of current status. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;50:352–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. Circulation 2003;108:1809–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, . A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:733–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widimsky P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bednar F, Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:823–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, . Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial-PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG, Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, . Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: A safety and feasibility study. Heart 1999;82:426–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines CL, Westerhausen DR, Jr, Grines LL, Hanlon JT, Logemann TL, Niemela M, . A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: The air primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1713–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, . 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, . Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Vesterlund T, Grande P, Abildgaard U, Thayssen P, . Danish multicenter randomized study on fibrinolytic therapy versus acute coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the Danish trial in acute myocardial infarction-2 (DANAMI-2). Am Heart J. 2003;146:234–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, Lopez-Sendon J, Lopez de SE, Goodman SG, Gore JM, Anderson FA, . External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:68–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorklund E, Lindahl B, Stenestrand U, Swahn E, Dellborg M, Pehrsson K, . Outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis in the unselected population is vastly different from samples of eligible patients in a large-scale clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2004;148:566–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahit MC, Cannon CP, Antman EM, Murphy SA, Gibson CM, McCabe CH, . Direct comparison of characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients enrolled versus patients not enrolled in a clinical trial at centers participating in the TIMI 9 Trial and TIMI 9 registry. Am Heart J. 2003;145:109–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CH, van Domburg RT, Hoye A, Lemos PA, Tanabe K, Smits PC, . Predictors of survival after contemporary percutaneous coronary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction in the real world. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:627–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen LO, Thayssen P. Treatment and prognosis after acute coronary syndrome in an unselected patient population. Ugeskr Laeger 2007;169:492–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Wallentin L. Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2006;296:1749–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe JH, Jr, Bailey WL, Rutherford BD, Hartzler GO. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in 1,000 consecutive patients. Results in an unselected population and high-risk subgroups. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:107G–15G.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gaal WJ, Clark D, Barlis P, Lim CC, Johns J, Horrigan M. Results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a consecutive group of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction at a tertiary Australian centre. Intern Med J. 2007;37:464–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi G, Memisha G, Valenti R, Trapani M, Migliorini A, Santoro GM, . Five year outcome after primary coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: Results from a single centre experience. Heart 2005;91:1541–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tadel-Kocjancic S, Zorman S, Jazbec A, Gorjup V, Zorman D, Noc M. Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction from a 5-year single-center experience. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:162–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1502–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejersten M, Sillesen M, Hansen PR, Nielsen SL, Nielsen H, Trautner S, . Effect on treatment delay of prehospital teletransmission of 12-lead electrocardiogram to a cardiologist for immediate triage and direct referral of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:941–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, Steg G, McFadden EP, Dubien PY, . Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: A randomised study. Lancet 2002;360:825–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta RH, O'Neill WW, Harjai KJ, Cox DA, Brodie BR, Boura J, . Prediction of one-year mortality among 30-day survivors after primary percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:817–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meine TJ, Al-Khatib SM, Alexander JH, Granger CB, White HD, Kilaru R, . Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am Heart J. 2005;149:670–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab JO, Schmitt H, Coch M, Bernhoeft F, Waas W, Raedle-Hurst T, . Results and significance of Holter monitoring after direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:466–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofsten DE, Wachtell K, Lund B, Molgaard H, Egstrup K. Prevalence and prognostic implications of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after revascularization with either fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:407–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, Dzavik V, Wong SC, Menon V, . One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001;285:190–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, . Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:625–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeymer U, Vogt A, Zahn R, Weber MA, Tebbe U, Gottwik M, . Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Eur Heart J. 2004;25:322–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurm HS, Bates ER. Cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Crit Care Clin. 2007;23:759–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar