Gender- and race-based utilization and outcomes of pulmonary artery catheterization in the setting of full-time intensivist staffing

References

• Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:447–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener RS, Welch HG. Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993–2004. JAMA. 2007;298:423–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee K. The Swan–Ganz catheters: past, present, and future. A viewpoint. Circulation. 2009;119:147–52.
   Google Scholar
• Koo KK, Sun JC, Zhou Q, Guyatt G, Cook DJ, Walter SD, . Pulmonary artery catheters: Evolving rates and reasons for use. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1613–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller HS, Chatterjee K, Davis KB, Fifer MA, Franklin C, Greenberg MA, . ACC expert consensus document. Present use of bedside right heart catheterization in patients with cardiac disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:840–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chernow B. Pulmonary artery flotation catheters. A statement by the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Thoracic Society. Chest. 1997;111:261–2.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport J, Teres D, Steingrub J, Higgins T, McGee W, Lemeshow S. Patient characteristics and ICU organizational factors that influence frequency of pulmonary artery catheterization. JAMA. 2000;283:2559–67.
   Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, . ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:E1–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, Hiesmayr M, Metnitz PG. Gender-related differences in intensive care: A multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1901–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson SE, Vasilevskis EE, Kuzniewicz MW, Cason BA, Lane RK, Dean ML, . The effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes among patients in the intensive care unit: A comprehensive study involving socioeconomic status and resuscitation preferences. Crit Care Med. 2009;39:429–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, Juurlink DN, Pinto R, Hladunewich MA, . Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ. 2007;177:1513–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JF, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Hawkins M, Knaus WA. African-American and white patients admitted to the intensive care unit: Is there a difference in therapy and outcome? Crit Care Med. 1995;23:626–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors AF, Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE, Jr, Wagner D, . The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA. 1996;276:889–97.
   Google Scholar
• Robin ED. Death by pulmonary artery flow-directed catheter. Time for a moratorium? Chest. 1987;92:727–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dalen JE, Bone RC. Is it time to pull the pulmonary artery catheter? JAMA. 1996;276:916–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen MG, Fonarow GC, Peterson ED, Moscucci M, Dai D, Hernandez AF, . Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: Findings from the get with the guidelines-coronary artery disease program. Circulation. 2010;121:2294–301.
   Google Scholar
• USS Commission. The Federal sentencing guidelines: A report on the operation of the guidelines system and short-term impacts on disparity in sentencing, use of incarceration, and prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining; 1991 US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar