Prognostic implications of atrio-ventricular block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era

References

• Berger PB, Ruocco NA Jr, Ryan TJ, Frederick MM, Jacobs AK, Faxon DP. Incidence and prognostic implications of heart block complicating inferior myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy: Results from TIMI II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:533–40.
   Google Scholar
• Berger PB, Ryan TJ. Inferior infarction: High risk subgroups. Circulation 1990;81:401–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tans AC, Lie KI, Durrer D. Clinical setting and prognostic significance of high degree atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction: A study of 144 patients. Am Heart J. 1980;99:4–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois C, Piérard LA, Smeets JP, Carlier J, Kulbertus HE. Long-term prognostic significance of atrioventricular block in inferior acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:816–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jones ME, Terry G, Kenmure AC. Frequency and significance of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1977;94:163–7.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, Wilkinson P, Ranjadayalan K, Timmis AD. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:893–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abidov A, Kaluski E, Hod H, Leor J, Vered Z, Gottlieb S, et al.,Israel Working Group on Intensive Cardiac Care. Influence of conduction disturbances on clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis (results from the ARGAMI-2 study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bhalli MA, Khan MQ, Samore NA, Mehreen S. Frequency and clinical outcome in conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009;21:32–7.
   Google Scholar
• Nicod P, Gilpin E, Dittrich H, Polikar R, Henning H, Ross J Jr. Long-term outcome in patients with inferior myocardial infarction and complete atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:589–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jurkovicová O, Cagán S. Supraventricular arrhythmias and disorders of atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Bratisl Lek Listy. 1998;99:172–80.
   Google Scholar
• Harpaz D, Behar SM, Gottlieb S, Boyko V, Kishon Y, Ekdar M, et al. Complete atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1721–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW, O’Keefe J, et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:673–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra F, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Reiber JH, Suryapranata H. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Eng J Med. 1993;328:680–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Reiffers S, Miedema K, Ottervanger JP, et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1413–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer MJ, Suryapranata H , Hoorntje JC, Reiffers S, Liem AL, Miedema K et al. Limitation of infarct size and preservation of left ventricular function after primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994;90:753–61.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review. J Am Med Assoc. 1997;278:2093–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley CE, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:210–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, García E, Mattos LA, Giambartolomei A, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction (Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group). N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1949–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone GW, Grines CL, Cox DA, García E, Tcheng JE, Griffin JJ, et al. Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:957–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archbold RA, Sayer JW, Ray S, Wilkinson P, Ranjadayalan K, Timmis AD. Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:893–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones ME, Terry G, Kenmure AC. Frequency and significance of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1977;94:163–7.
   Google Scholar
• Meine TJ, Al-Khatib SM, Alexander JH, Granger CB, White HD, Kilaru R, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of high-degree atrioventricular block complicating acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. Am Heart J. 2005;149:670–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, Zlotikamien B, Chetrit A, Olmer L, et al. Admission clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics predicting in-hospital development of high-degree atrioventricular block in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1134–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jim MH, Chan AO, Tse HF, Barold SS, Lau CP. Clinical and angiographic findings of complete atrioventricular block in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Ann Ac Ad Med Singapore. 2010;39:185–90.
   Google Scholar
• Harper R, Hunt D, Vohra J, Peter T, Sloman G. His bundle electrogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by auriculoventricular or intraventricular conduction disturbances. Br Heart J. 1975;37:705–10.
   Google Scholar
• Vivas BD, Pérez VMJ, Hernández AR, Fernández OA, Bañuelos C, Escaned J, et al. Prognostic implications of bundle branch block in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty in the stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:1276–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viliani D, Vivas BD, Chung M, Pérez VMJ, Hernández AR, Bañuelos C et al. Prognosis of different types of atrial fibrillation in primary angioplastia era. Coron Artery Dis. 2012;23:511–6.
   Google Scholar