Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments

References

• Fish J, Manly T, Emslie H, Evans J, Wilson B. Compensatory strategies for acquired disorders of memory and planning: Differential effects of a paging system for patients with brain injury of traumatic versus cerebrovascular aetiology. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatr 2007;26:2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis EA, Szymkowiak A, Gregor P, Newell AF, Hine N, Wilson BA, Evans J, Shah P. Usable technology? Challenges in designing a memory aid with current electronic devices. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming JM, Schum D, Strong J, Lightbody S. Prospective memory rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: A compensatory training programme. Brain Inj 2005;19:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis J, Kvavilashvili L. Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present, and future directions. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000;14:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman P, Dayle R, Hood CA, Rumrell L. Effectiveness of the ISAAC cognitive prosthetic system for improving rehabilitation outcomes with neurofunctional impairment. Neurorehabilitation 2003;18:57–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Buchhofer BS, Vaccaro M. Portable electronic devices as memory and organisational aids after traumatic brain injury: A consumer survey study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;8:351–365.
   Google Scholar
• Stapeleton S, Adams M, Atterton L. A mobile phone as a memory aid for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation. Brain Inj 2007;21:401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowd MM, Robinson Boone KA, Park GJ. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: Follow-up findings. Brain Inj 2000;14:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappa SF, Benke T, Clarke S, Rossi B, Stenhammar B, van Heugten CM. EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: Report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:665–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek MD, Downes J, Johnson Z, Dayus B, Hilton N. Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. Brain Inj 2000;14:455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: A randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatr 2001;70:477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprani N, Greaney J, Proter N. A review of memory aid devices for an ageing population. Psycho Neurol J 2006;4:205–243.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack M. Autominder: A case study of assistive technology for elders with cognitive impairment. Am Soc Aging 2006;30:67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Lindberg Stenvall C, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. A training apartment with a set of electronic memory aids for persons with cognitive impairments Scandinavian. J Occup Ther 2009;22:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg C, Bartfai A, Granqvist A, Söderström M. Facile system demonstration report 2000. Deliverable No:6.4.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Research design in clinical psychology. 4th ed, Boston: Alyn & Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead behavioural memory test. 2nd ed. Bury St Edmunds, UK, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton R, Chelune G, Talley J, Kay G, Curtiss G. Wisconsin card sorting test manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff R, Allen C. The ruff 2 and 7 selective attention test manual. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• WAIS-III. Manual. Cleveland: Psychological Corporation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• WAIS-III NI. Manual. Cleveland: Psychological Corporation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Canadian occupational performance measure. 4th ed, Toronto, ON: Publications ACE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Hussey S. Assistive technologies and practice. 2nd ed, Missouri: Mosby; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlsiö B, Britton M, Murray V, Theorell T. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1984;15:886–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fughl-Meyer AR, Bränholm IB, Fughl-Meyer KS. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clinical Rehabil 1991;5:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wills P, Clare L, Shields A, Wilson BA. Assessing subtle memory impairments in the everyday memory performance of brain injury people: Exploring the potential of the extended Rivermead behavioural memory test. Brain Inj 2000;14:693–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ. Evaluating clinical change: Strategies for occupational and physical therapists, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren L, Emmelin M, Winkvist A. Qualitative methods for international public health, Umeå University, Umeå: Print and Media; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, Nochajski SM, Wu YW. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil 2007;2:235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer M, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer M. Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Tham K, Granqvist A, Bartfai A, Hemmingsson H. Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired injury: A study of the learning process and the usability. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2007;2:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gartland D. Considerations in the selection and use of technology with people who have cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. Br Med J 2002;324:1193–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, Bodisch Lynch K. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: A community-based trail. Brain Inj 2008;22:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Public Health 1997;87:384–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet V. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol 2003;15:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur N, Gliskey E, Wilson BA. Technological memory aids for people with memory deficits. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emslie H, Wilson BA, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Watson P. Using a paging system in the rehabilitation of encephalitic patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2007;17:567–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar