Establishing best practice in seating assessment for children with physical disabilities using qualitative methodologies

References

• Pain H, Gore S, McLellan DL. Parents' and therapists' opinion on features that make a chair useful for a young disabled child. Int J Rehabil Res 2000;23:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ. A clinical framework for evaluation of wheelchair seating. OT Practice 1993;4:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter NC, Blake DJ. Wheelchairs and seating systems: clinical applications. Phys Med Rehabil 1997;11:107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Perr A. Elements of seating and wheeled mobility intervention. OT Prac 1998;9:16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings J. Seating assessment and planning. Top Spinal Cord Inj Med 2000;11:183–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rappl L, Jones DA. Seating Evaluation: special problems and interventions for older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2000;16:63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck S. All by myself. Rehab Manage 2001;14:36 (see also 38,40).
   Google Scholar
• Minkel JL. Mat Evaluation. Seventeenth International Seating Symposium held at the Rosen Centre Hotel; 2001 Feb 22–24;Orlando. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2001. 205 p.
   Google Scholar
• Buck S. Finding the comfort zone. Rehab Manage 2003;16:22, 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Morress C. Bottom-up or top-down? An occupation-based approach to seating. OT Pract 2006;11:12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Paleg G. Paediatric seating and support. Rehab Manage 2006;19:55–56 (see also 58–59).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dworak PA, Levey A. Strolling along. Rehab Manage 2005;18:26 (see also 28, 30–31).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C. Posture and seating for wheelchair users: an introduction. Br J Ther Rehabil 2001;8:24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gilinsky G, Smith C. New wheelchair or new solutions? Rehab Management [serial online]. Internet. 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.rehabpub.com/features/1022006/3.asp via the INTERNET. Last accessed 11 May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McClinton DH. Seating and positioning systems provide pediatric patients with clinical, environmental benefits. Care Manage 2007;13:23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hong CS. Positioning for children with learning disabilities. Br J Ther Rehabil 2002;9:443–446.
   Google Scholar
• Di Marco A, Russell M, Masters M. Standards for wheelchair prescription. Aust Occup Ther J 2003;50:30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Janson JE. Mat examination and seating simulation: ingredients for successful positioning. Except Parent 2005;35:30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ. On mobility: functional fit – how to choose the right seating systems for children. Adv Dir Rehabil 2001;10:35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Koch KE. Have a seat: how to choose the right seating system for children. Adv Dir Rehabil 2002;11:23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rader J, Jones D, Miller, LL. Individualized wheelchair seating: reducing restraints and improving comfort and function. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1999;15:34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt S. Assessment techniques: the supine and sitting evaluation. Sixteenth International Seating Symposium held in Vancouver; 2000 Feb 24–26; Vancouver. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2000. 192 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt S. Translating assessment findings into generic product features. Sixteenth International Seating Symposium held in Vancouver; 2000 Feb 24–26; Vancouver. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2000. 192 p.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell K. To study postural seating techniques utilised in USA, Canada and England to assist the person with a physical disability to achieve optimal function [report]. Winston Churchill Memorial Trust [online]. Internet. 2003. 23 p.Electronic Citation. http://www.churchilltrust.com.au/res/File/Fellow_Reports/Campbell%20Kristen%202002.pdf via the INTERNET. Last accessed 23 July 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh KG. Measuring the right angle. Rehab Manage 2005;10:40 (see also 43–47).
   Google Scholar
• Isaacson M. Only the best. Rehab Manage 2004;17:34–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Isaacson M. Best practices by occupational and physical therapists performing seating and mobility evaluations [dissertation], Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University; 2003.183 p.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim WM. The research methods knowledge base, 2nd ed. [Internet]. 2006. Electronic Citation. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/. Last accessed 3 November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Coggrave MJ, Rose LS. A specialist seating assessment clinic: changing pressure relief practice. Spinal Cord 2003;41:692–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson D, Velde B, Hoff T, Kvashay D, Manross P, Moreau V. Clinical reasoning of a novice versus an experienced occupational therapist: a qualitative study. Occup Ther Health Care 2000;12:15–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leicht MS, Dickerson A. Clinical reasoning, looking back. Occup Ther Health Care 2001;14:105–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa J, Bowen R, Case-Smith J, Epstein CF, Moyers P, Schwope C. Standards for continuing competence for occupational therapy practitioners. OT Pract 2000;5:CE1–CE8.
   Google Scholar
• Harries P, Harries C. Studying clinical reasoning, part 1: have we been taking the wrong track? Br J Occup Ther 2001;64:164–168.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree M. Images of reasoning: a literature review. Aust Occup Ther J 1998;45:113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Pountney TE, Cheek L, Green E, Mulcahy C, Nelham R. Content and criterion validity of the Chailey Levels of Ability. Physiotherapy 1999;85:410–416.
   Google Scholar
• Myhr U, von Wendt L, Norrlin S, Radell U. Five year follow-up of functional sitting position in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1995;37:587–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid DT. Development and preliminary validation of an instrument to assess quality of sitting of children with neuromotor dysfunction. Sitting Assessment for Children with Neuromotor Dysfunction (SACND). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1995;15:53–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fife SE, Roxborough LA, Armstrong RW, Harris SR, Gregson JL, Field D. Development of a clinical measure of postural control for assessment of adaptive seating in children with neuromotor disabilities. Phys Ther 1991;71:113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Polgar S, Thomas SA. Introduction to research in the health sciences, 4th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Portoghese C. Seated impact. Rehab Manage 2005;18:36 (see also 38–39).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregorio-Torres TL. Wheelchair and seating evaluation: an Occupational Therapy approach. OT Pract 2006;11:CE1–CE8.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DI. Not your parent's wheelchair. Rehab Manage 2004;17:26–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VanStraaten M. Success with assistive technology: positioning, placement and asking the right questions. Except Parent 2003;33:69–71.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes S. The use of a pressure ulcer risk assessment tool for children. Nurs Times 2004;100:56–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler CT. Pediatric skin care: guidelines for assessment, prevention and treatment. Pediatr Nurs 2006;32:443–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willock J. A risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in children. Nurs Times 2007;103:32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Willock J, Maylor M. Pressure ulcers in infants and children. Nurs Stand 2003;24:56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Miller-Pogar J. Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:275–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson-Pell M, Nicholson G, Bain D, Call E, Grady J, deVries J. The role of wheelchair seating standards in determining clinical practices and funding policy. Assist Technol 2005;17:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsterdam P. Considerations in pediatric wheelchair assessments. Case Manager 1999;10:20–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BDF Newlife. It's not too much to ask [report]. BDF Newlife [online]. Internet. 2007. 74 p. Electronic Citation. http://www. bdfnewlife.co.uk/docs/your_story/BDF_Report_NTMTA_legal. pdf via the INTERNET. Last accessed 22 May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, Flinn N, Wootten M, McCorry S. Development and testing of a pelvic goniometer designed to measure pelvic tilt and hip flexion. Clin Biomech 2003;18:462–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitcombe-Shingler M. The history of the wheelchair assessment service in New Zealand: from client centred to client directed. N Z J Occup Ther 2006;53:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Silcox L. Assessment for the prescription wheelchairs: what training is available to therapists? Br J Occup Ther 1995;58:115–118.
   Google Scholar
• Turner C. Issues when prescribing paediatric manual wheelchairs. Br J Ther Rehabil 2001;8:311–316.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Surtees R, Wirz S. The international classification of functioning, disability, and health provide a model for adaptive seating interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Br J Occup Ther 2004;67:293–302.
   Google Scholar
• National Library for Health. About care pathways. [Internet], London, UK: HMSO; 2005. Electronic Citation. http://www. library.nhs.uk/pathways/ViewResource.aspx?resID=259106& tabID=290&caID=12584 via the INTERNET. Last accessed 11 May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. Wheelchairs – part 1: guidelines for the application of the ISO 7176 series on wheelchairs. [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2005. Electronic Citation. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41686. Last accessed 19 January 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilition Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America. Position papers. [Internet]. Pittsburgh, USA: RESNA. Electronic Citation. http://www.rstce.pitt.edu/RSTCE_Resources/RSTCE_Resources.html. Last accessed 19 January 2009.
   Google Scholar