Working toward equitable opportunities for science students with disabilities: Using professional development and technology

References

• Alston RJ, Hampton JL. Science and engineering as viable career choices for students with disabilities: a survey of parents and teachers. Rehabil Counsel Bull Spring 2000;43:158–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston R, Bell T, Hampton J. Learning disability and career entry into the sciences: a critical analysis of attitudinal factors. J Career Dev Summer 2002;28:263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenkopf TA, Stern V, Swanson AB, Wohlers HD, editors. Working chemists with disabilities. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson LR. Inservice training to facilitate inclusion: an outcomes evaluation. Reading Writing Q 2000;16:281–287.
   Google Scholar
• Mumba F, Chitiyo M. High school science teachers' curriculum, instructional and assessment decisions for inclusive classes. Prob Educ 21st Century 2008;9:74–80.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Welander J, Granlund M. Participation in everyday school activities for children with and without disabilties. J Dev Phys Disabil 2007;19:485–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich R, Besio S. Being informed, demanding and responsible consumers of assistive technology: an educational issue. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:152–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White EA, Wepner SB, Wetzel DC. Accessible education through assistive technology. T H E Journal 2003;30:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bargerhuff ME, Wheatly M. Teaching with CLASS: creating laboratory access for science students. Teacher Educ Special Educ 2004;27:318–321.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs TE, Mastropieri MA. Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958–1995: a research synthesis. Except Children 1996;63:59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman K, Caseau D, Stefanich GP. Teaching students with disabilities in inclusive science classrooms: survey results. Science Educ 1998;82:127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke K, Sutherland C. attitudes toward inclusion: knowledge vs. experience. Education 2004;125:163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Schotsberger PG. Changing mathematics teaching through Web-based professional development. Comput Schools 2001;17:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson S. Teaching high school science students with learning and emotional disabilities in inclusion science classrooms: a case study of four teachers' beliefs and practices. J Sci Teacher Educ 2002;13:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Hayden S, Cade E, Baker-Kroczynski S. Including students with disabilities into the general education science classroom. Exceptional Children Year 2002;68:423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirch SA, Bargerhuff ME, Cowan H, Wheatly M. Reflections of educators in pursuit of inclusive science classrooms. J Sci Teacher Educ 2007;18:663–692.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz JA, Turner HM. The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. J Res Sci Teach 2000;37:963–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester JH. Planning effective secondary professional development programs. Am Secondary Educ 2003;32:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Watson S, Johnston L. Assistive technology in the inclusive science classroom: devices and services can help science students with a wide variety of needs. The Sci Teacher 2007;74:34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Baer R, Flexer RW, McMahan RK. Transition models and promising practices. In: Flexer RW, Simmons TJ, Luft R, Baer R, editors. Transition planning for secondary students with disabilites. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2005. pp. 53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lankutis T, Kennedy K. Assistive technology and the multiage classroom. Technol Learn 2002;22:38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanich GP, Norman KI. Teaching science to students with disabilities: experiences and perceptions of classroom teachers and science educators. Washington, DC: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kirch SA, Bargerhuff ME, Turner H, Wheatly M. Inclusive science education: Classroom teacher and science educator experiences in CLASS workshops. School Sci Math 2005;105:175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan R, Bilken SK. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein N, Sears S, Wilcoxen A, Cabello, B Spangna M. Moving toward inclusive practices. Remedial Special Educ 2004;25:104–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuBurton D, Pace D. Preparing pre-service teachers to teach mathematics in inclusive classrooms: a three-year case study. School Sci Math 2009;109:108–115.
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone J, Parmar R. Issues and challenges for middle school mathematics teachers in inclusion classrooms. School Sci Math 2006;106:338–348.
   Google Scholar
• Gately S, Hammer C. An exploratory case study of the preparation of secondary teachers to meet special education needs in the general classroom. Teacher Educator 2005;40:238–256.
   Google Scholar
• Best SJ, Heller KW, Bigge JL. Adaptations and instruction in science and social studies in Teaching Individuals with Physical or Multiple Disabilities. Upper Saddle River: Merrrill Prentice Hall; 2009. pp 471–500.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes C, Lamar-Dukes P. Inclusion by design: engineering inclusive practices in secondary schools. Teaching Exceptional Children 2009;41:16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Van Reusen AK, Shoho AR, Barker KS. High school teacher attitudes toward inclusion. High School J 2000–2001;84:7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Owston R, Wideman H. Evaluating web-based teacher development projects: Models, methods, and outcomes. J Distance Educ 2002;17:46–66.
   Google Scholar