508
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A technique to train finger coordination and independence after stroke

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 279-287 | Published online: 06 Apr 2010

References

  • Hogan N, Krebs HI, Rohrer B, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Fasoli S, Stein J, Hughes R, Frontera W, Lynch D, Volpe BT. Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:605–618.
  • Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: does it matter what the robot does? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:619–630.
  • Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, Wee SK, Kuah CW, Chua KS, Gassert R, Milner TE, Teo CL, Burdet E. Rehabilitation of grasping and forearm pronation/supination with the haptic knob. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotic Rehabilitation (ICORR) 2009. pp 22–27.
  • Dovat L, Lambercy O, Salman B, Johnson V, Milner TE, Gassert R, Burdet E, Teo CL. Post-stroke training of finger coordination with the HandCARE (cable-actuated rehabilitation equipment): a case study. Proc i-CREATe; 2008. pp 130–134.
  • Lambercy O, Dovat L, Gassert R, Burdet E, Teo CL, Milner TE. A haptic knob for rehabilitation of hand function. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15:356–366.
  • Dovat L, Lambercy O, Salman B, Johnson V, Gassert R, Burdet E, Teo CL, Milner TE. Post-stroke training of a pick and place activity in a virtual environment. Virtual Rehabil 2008. pp 28–34.
  • Dovat L, Lambercy O, Gassert R, Maeder T, Milner TE, Teo CL, Burdet E. HandCARE: A cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:582–591.
  • Hunter SM, Crome P. Hand function and stroke. Rev Clin Gerontol 2002;12:68–81.
  • Schieber MH, Santello M. Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol 2004;96:2293–2300.
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13–31.
  • Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1969;50:311–319.
  • Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The purdue pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 1948;32:234–247.
  • Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993;24:58–63.
  • Cruz EG, Waldinger HC, Kamper DG. Kinetic and kinematic workspaces of the index finger following stroke. Brain 2005;128:1112–1121.
  • Kamper DG, Harvey RL, Suresh S, Rymer WZ. Relative contributions of neural mechanisms versus muscle mechanics in promoting finger extension deficits following stroke. Muscle Nerve 2003;28:309–318.
  • Lang CE, Schieber MH. Differential impairment of individuated finger movements in humans after damage to the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. J Neurophysiol 2003;90:1160–1170.
  • Li S, Latash ML, Yue GH, Siemionow V, Sahgal V. The effects of stroke and age on finger interaction in multi-finger force production tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:1646–1655.
  • Winstein C, Wing AM, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Grafman J, Robertson IH, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology Volume 9: plasticity and rehabilitation, Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003. pp 77–138.
  • Dovat L, Lambercy O, Johnson V, Salman B, Wong S, Gassert R, Burdet E, Teo CL, Milner TE. A cable driven robotic system to train finger function after stroke. Proc of the IEEE International Conference on Robotic Rehabilitation (ICORR); 2007. pp 222–227.
  • Gassert R, Moser R, Burdet E, Bleuler H. MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2006;11:216–224.
  • Tan HZ, Srinivasan MA, Eberman B, Cheng B. Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dyn Syst Control 1994;55:353–359.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.