Usability assessment of ASIBOT: a portable robot to aid patients with spinal cord injury

References

• Harris A, Pinnington LL, Ward CD. Evaluating the impact of mobility-related assistive technology on the lives of disabled people: a review of outcome measures. Br J Occup Ther 2005;553–558.
   Google Scholar
• Rumeau P, Rialle V, Noury N. A priori evaluation of acceptance of an activity monitoring device for the disabled elderly using the HIS as a model. Smart Homes and Beyond. IOS Press; Nieuwe Hemweg 6B, 1013 BG Amsterdam. The Netherlands. 2006. pp 130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. J Assist Technol 1996;8:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80: 528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai JW, Fuhrer MJ, Demers L, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). J Assist Technol 1996;8:3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Branner A, Chen D, Penn RD, Donoghue JP. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 2006;442:164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer C, Giménez A, Jardón A. The MATS robot: service climbing robot for personal assistance. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 2006;13:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardón A, Jiménez A, Correal R, Cabas R, Martínez S, Balaguer C. A portable light-weight climbing robot for personal assistance applications. Ind Robot Int J 2006;33: 303–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaguer C, Giménez A, Jardón A, Correal R, Martínez S. Proprio & teleoperation of a robotic system for disabled persons assistance in domestic environments. In: Advances in telerobotics, Vol. 31. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR); SPRINGER Secaucus, NJ 07096-2485 USA2007. pp 389–402.
   Google Scholar
• Jardón A, Giménez A, Correal R, Martínez S, Balaguer C. ASIBOT: Robot portátil de asistencia a discapacitados. Concepto, arquitectura de control y evaluación clínica. Revista Iberoamericana de Automatica e Informatica Industrial 2008;5:48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Balaguer C, Giménez A, Jardón A. Climbing robots' mobility for inspection and maintenance of 3D complex environments. Autonomous Robots 2005;18:157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardón A. Assistive robot design methodology. Application to portable robot ASIBOT. Madrid: University Carlos III of Madrid; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cabas R, Balaguer C. Design and development of a light weight embodied robotic hand activated with only one actuator. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'2005), Edmonton, Canada2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cabas R, Cabas LM, Jardón A, Balaguer C. Optimized design of the underactuated robotic hand. International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'06), Orlando, United States2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jardón A, Martinez S, Giménez A, Balaguer C. Assistive robots dependability in domestic environment: the ASIBOT kitchen test bed. 6th IARP/IEEE-RAS/EURON Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments, Pasadena CA, USA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska R, De Witte L. An international content validation of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Occup Ther Int 1999;6:159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). J Assist Technol 2000;12:96–105.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin J. Handbook of usability testing. How to plan, design and conduct effective tests. New York: Wiley; 1994. pp 57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive device. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;7:425–436.
   Google Scholar
• Lenkert JA, Paquet VL. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. J Assist Technol 2003;15:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Virzi RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 1992;34:457–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. ACM INTERCHI'93 Conference, 1993 April 24–29, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 1993. pp 206–213.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis JR. Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations. Hum Factors 1994;36:368–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JR. Evaluation of procedures for adjusting problem-discovery rates estimated from small samples. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2001;13:445–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J. Determining usability test sample size. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Vol. 3; 2nd ed. 2006. pp 3084–3088.
   Google Scholar
• Simon SE, Patrick A. Understanding and assessing consumer satisfaction in rehabilitation. J Rehabil Outcomes Measure 1997;1:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Carr-Hill RA. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med 1992;14:236–490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers L, Ska B, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R. Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MG, Thorslund M. The use of technical aids among community based elderly. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:712–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers JC, Holm MB. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley RK, Stafford DJ, Rasch E, Rodgers MM. Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Swuste J, Dupuis DJ, MacLeod DA, Monroe R. The wheelchair skills test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar