Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others

References

• Nygard L, Starkhammar S. The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: mapping out the difficulties. Aging Ment Health 2007;11:144–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodine C, Scherer MJ. Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the US Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR): reports from working groups. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1567–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Assistive technology (AT) versus mainstream technology (MST): the research perspective. Tech Disabil 2006;18:19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lange M, Smith R. Technology and occupation: contemporary viewpoints. The future of electronic aids to daily living. Am J Occup Ther 2002;56:107–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: the introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman IL, Tham K, Granqvist A, Bartfai A, Hemmingsson H. Using electronic aids to daily living after acquired brain injury: a study of the learning process and the usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:23–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, Herzog J, Kneipp S, Laatsch L, Morse PA. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1596–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Burke DT, Dowds MM Jr., Boone KA, Park GJ. Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings. Brain Inj 2000;14:187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees L, Marshall S, Hartridge C, Mackie D, Weiser M. Cognitive interventions post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj 2007;21:161–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, van Boxtel M. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry T, Wallace J, Kvarfordt C, Lynch KB. Personal digital assistants as cognitive aids for individuals with severe traumatic brain injury: a community-based trial. Brain Inj 2008;22:19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade TK, Troy JC. Mobile phones as a new memory aid: a preliminary investigation using case studies. Brain Inj 2001; 15:305–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thöne-Otto AIT, Walther K. How to design an electronic memory aid for brain-injured patients: considerations on the basis of a model of prospective memory. Int J Psych 2003; 38:236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley C, Evans JJ. SMS text messages as a means of recall of therapy goals in brain injury rehabilitation: a singel blind within-subjects trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010;20: 103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Lexell J, Lund ML. Improvments of task performance in daily life after acquired brain injury using commonly available everyday technology.Disabil Rehabil Ass Tech. Early Online 2010:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H, Booth K, Fear S, Gill G. Chronic disease patient education: lessons from meta-analyses. Patient Educ Couns 2001;44:107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dry A, Colantonio A, Cameron JI, Mihailidis A. Technology in the lives of women who live with memory impairment as a result of a traumatic brain injury. Assist Technol 2006; 18:170–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson A, Karlsson G, Soderstrom M, Tham K. A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: lived experiences of persons with brain damage. Am J Occup Ther 2004;58:261–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan S. Traumatic brain injury: a review. Crit Care Nurs Q 2005;28:188–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupational therapy intervention process model. A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered and occupation-based interventions[#,','].Fort Collins, USA: Three Star Press2009.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Evans JJ. Error-free learning in the rehabilitation of people with memory impairments. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996;11:54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare L, Jones RS. Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impairment: a critical review. Neuropsychol Rev 2008;18:1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlittertur2009.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson B, Scott-Findlay S. Critical issues in interviewing people with traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res 2002; 12:399–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Needham P, Brentnall S. Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2003;9:925–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson Lund M, Lövgren Engström A-L, Lexell J. Response actions to difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury. Scand J Occcup Ther. Accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble MJ, Dowler DL, Orslene LE. Assistive technology: choosing the right tool for the right job. J Vocat Rehabil 2006;24:73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol 2008;20:194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Quatrano LA, Lieberman ML, editors. Designing and using assistive technology. The human perspective[#,','].Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C. Functions or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Tecnol Disabil 1999;11:3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Clark F, Sanders K, Carlson M, Blanche E, Jackson J. Synthesis of habit theory. OTJR: Occup Particip Health 2007;27(suppl): 7S–23S.
   Google Scholar
• LoPresti EF, Mihailidis A, Kirsch N. Assisitve technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsych Rehabil 2004;14:5–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation. Theory and application. 4th edPhiladelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins2008.
   Google Scholar
• Pigot H, Savary J-P, Metzger J-L, Rochon A, Beaulieu M. Advanced technology guidelines to fullfill the needs of the cognitively impaired population. From smart homes to smart care. Assisitve Technology Research Series[#,','].In: Giroux S, Pigot H, editors. Amsterdam: ISO Press2005. pp 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications1985.
   Google Scholar