341
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Responses of potential users to the intracortical visual prosthesis: final themes from the analysis of focus group data

, , &
Pages 304-313 | Received 23 Apr 2011, Accepted 01 Oct 2011, Published online: 30 Mar 2012

References

  • Choi CQ. World’s first prosthetic: Egyptian mummy’s fake toe. Live Science. Available at: www.livescience.com/history/070727_old_toe.html. Accessed July 27, 2007.
  • National Council on Disability. Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. Washington, DC; 2000.
  • World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland; 2002.
  • Arokiasamy CV, Rubin SE, Roessler RT. Sociological aspects of disability. In: SE Rubin, RT Roessler, editors. Foundations of the Vocational Rehabilitation Process. 6th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2008.
  • Cook A, Polgar JM. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2008.
  • Hansson SO. Implant ethics. J Med Ethics 2005;31:519–525.
  • Brindley GS, Lewin WS. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1968;196:479–493.
  • Wolpe PR. Treatment, enhancement, and the ethics of neurotherapeutics. Brain Cogn 2002;50:387–395.
  • Northoff G. Do brain tissue transplants alter personal identity? Inadequacies of some “standard” arguments. J Med Ethics 1996;22:174–180.
  • Kurson R. Crashing through: a true story of risk, adventure, and the man who dared to see. New York, NY: Random House, Inc; 2007.
  • Nunes R. Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation. Theor Med Bioeth 2001;22:337–349.
  • Pierce, B. (November, 2008). No such thing as a blind culture. Braille Monitor. Available at: http://www.nfb.org/Images/nfb/Publications/bm/bm08/bm0810/bm081007.htm Accessed on 20 October 2009.
  • Troyk PR. Multi-channel transcutaneous cortical stimulation system. (Contract # N01-NS-7-2365 Final Report). Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Institute of Technology; 2008.
  • Lowenstein K, Borchardt M. Neuronal activity evoked by chronically implanted intracranial micro-electrodes. Exp Neurol 1918;92:147–161.
  • Penfield W, Rasmussen T. The cerebral cortex in man. New York, NY: McMillan; 1950.
  • Penfield W, Jasper H. Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the human brain. London, England: Churchill; 1954.
  • Brindley GS, Donaldson PE, Falconer MA, Rushton DN. The extent of the region of occipital cortex that when stimulated gives phosphenes fixed in the visual field. J Physiol (Lond) 1972;225:57–58.
  • Brindley GS. The variability of the human striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1972;225:1–3.
  • Brindley GS. Sensory effects of electrical stimulation of the visual and paravisual cortex in man. In: R Jung, editor. Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Veriag; 1973. pp 583–594.
  • Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG. Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind. J Physiol (Lond) 1974;243:553–576.
  • Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Girvin JP. Artifical vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis. Science 1974;183:440–444.
  • Dobelle WH, Mladejovsky MG, Evans JR, Roberts TS, Girvin JP. “Braille” reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation. Nature 1976;259:111–112.
  • Dobelle WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J 2000;46:3–9.
  • Troyk P, Bak M, Berg J, Bradley D, Cogan S, Erickson R, Kufta C, et al. A model for intracortical visual prosthesis research. Artif Organs 2003;27:1005–1015.
  • Lane FJ, Huyck MH, Troyk P. Looking ahead: planning for the first human intracortical visual prosthesis by using pilot data from focus groups of potential users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:139–147.
  • Troyk PR, Huyck MH, Lane FJ. Responses of potential users to the intracortical visual prosthesis: focus group pilot data. Poster presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Opthamology (Session 4228-D761). Fort Lauderdale, FL; 2009.
  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2001.
  • Archard D. Self-justifying paternalism. J Value Inquiry 1993;27:341–352.
  • Ebbesen M, Pedersen BD. The principle of respect for autonomy–concordant with the experience of oncology physicians and molecular biologists in their daily work? BMC Med Ethics 2008;9:5.
  • Fawcett SB. Some values guiding community research and action. J Appl Behav Anal 1991;24:621–636.
  • Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods: techniques and procedures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
  • Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
  • Lane F, Huyck M, Delbeke J, Troyk P. An ethnographic study of the optic nerve prosthesis project. 2009.
  • Lane F, Huyck M, Troyk P. Patient perspectives of visual prostheses in clinical trials. 2011.
  • Erikson E. The eight stages of man. Childhood and Society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton; 1963.
  • Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD, National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1050–1058.
  • Mangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1496–1504.
  • Stelmack JA, Szlyk JP, Stelmack TR, Demers-Turco P, Williams RT, Moran D, Massof RW. Measuring outcomes of vision rehabilitation with the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2006;47:3253–3261.
  • Stelmack JA, Szlyk JP, Stelmack TR, Demers-Turco P, Williams RT, Moran D, Massof RW. Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3919–3928.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.