392
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Measurement of the product attitudes of youth during the selection of assistive technology devices

, &
Pages 21-29 | Received 28 Dec 2011, Accepted 11 Apr 2012, Published online: 05 Jun 2012

References

  • Parette HP, VanBiervliet A, Hourcade JJ. Family-centered decision-making in assistive technology. J Spec Educ Technol 2000;15:45–55.
  • Gall C, Kingsnorth S, Healy H. Growing up ready: a shared management approach. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2006;26:47–62.
  • Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J. Family-centred service: A conceptual framework and research review. Phys Occupat Thera Pediat 1998;18:1–20.
  • McCabe MA. Involving children and adolescents in medical decision making: developmental and clinical considerations. J Pediatr Psychol 1996;21:505–516.
  • Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, De Witte LP. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:146–158.
  • Lenker JA, Scherer MJ, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, DeRuyter F. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assist Technol 2005;17:7–22.
  • Scherer MJ. Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. 4th ed. 2005, Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
  • Valekenburg PM, Cantor J. The development of a child into a consumer. Appl Devel Psychol 2001;22:61–72.
  • Ward S. Consumer socialization. J Consum Res 1974;1:1–14.
  • John DR. Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. J Consum Res 1999;26:183–213.
  • Ginsburg HP, Opper S. Piaget’s Theory of Intellectual Development. 1988. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Selman RL. The growth of interpersonal understanding. 1980, New York: Academic Press.
  • Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol 1993;5:36–45.
  • Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44–50.
  • Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte L. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices: A literature overview. Technol Disabil 2003;15:231–238.
  • Scherer MJ, Jutai JW, Fuhrer MJ, Demers L, DeRuyter F A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehab:Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8.
  • Scherer M, Zapf S. Developing a measure to appropriately match students with disabilities and assistive technology devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:e21–e22.
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd edition. 2003, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Borgers N, Hox J, Sikkel D. Response quality in survey research with children and adolescents: the effect of labelled response options and vague quantifiers. Intern J Public Opin Res 2003;15:83–94.
  • Bell A. Designing and testing questionnaires for children. J Res Nurs 2007;461–469.
  • Ryan SE. There’s one in everyone: Measuring the attitudes of children toward consumer products. Doing research with kids: Designs, dilemmas & directions. International invitational workshop on children’s direct involvement in research. Toronto, Canada, October 2009.
  • Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illness 1994;16: 103–121.
  • Light J, Page R, Curran J, Pitkin L. Children’s ideas for the design of AAC assistive technologies for young children with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:274–287.
  • Allsop M, Gallagher J, Holt R, Bhakta B, Wilkie RM. Involving children in the development of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6:148–156.
  • Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children’s perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009;4:95–105.
  • Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1243–1251.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.