1,651
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

“Do I need it? Do I really need it?” Elderly peoples experiences of unmet assistive technology device needs

, &
Pages 287-293 | Received 27 Dec 2011, Accepted 30 May 2012, Published online: 17 Jul 2012

References

  • Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services, Report no. 47 (2008–2009) to the Storting. The coordination reform. Proper treatment - at the right place and time. Oslo; 2008–2009.
  • World Health Organization [Internet]. Preventing chronic disease: a vital investment. Geneva, Switzerland 2005. Retrieved 13 December 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/part1/en/index.html
  • Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009;374:1196–1208.
  • Lansley P, McCreadie C, Tinker A. Can adapting the homes of older people and providing assistive technology pay its way? Age Ageing 2004;33:571–576.
  • Löfqvist C, Nygren C, Széman Z, Iwarsson S. Assistive devices among very old people In five European countries. Scand J Occup Ther 2005;12:181–192.
  • McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Aging Soc 2005;25:91–110.
  • De Craen AJM, Westendorp RGJ, Willems CG, Buskens ICM, Gussekloo J. Assistive devices and community-based services among 85-year-old community-dwelling elderly In The Netherlands: Ownership, use and need for intervention. Disabil Rehab: Assist Technol 2006;1:199–203.
  • The National Insurance Administration. The provision of assistive aids - part of a larger system. Information about the provision of assistive aids.Oslo; The National Insurance Administration; 2003.
  • Insurance Act of 1997. Ministry of Labour, Oslo.
  • Mann WC, Tomita M, Packard S, Hurren D, Creswell C. The need for information on assistive devices by older persons. Assist Technol 1994;6:134–139.
  • Roelands M, Van Oost P, Buysse A, Depoorter A. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices for mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1441–1451.
  • Howse K, Ebrahim S, Gooberman-Hill R. Help-avoidance: Why older people do not always seek help. Rev ClIn Gerontol 2004;14:63–70.
  • Torres S, Hammarström G. Speaking of ‘limitations’ while trying to disregard them: A qualitative study of how diminished everyday competence and aging can be regarded. J Aging Stud 2006:2:291–302.
  • Berndtsson I. Tekniska hjälpmedel, synskadade och samhället. In: Bengtsson J, editor. Med livsvärlden som grund: Bidrag till utvecklandet av en livsvärldsfenomenologisk ansats i pedagogisk forskning. 2nd ed. Lund; Studentlitteratur; 2005. [In Swedish]
  • Louise-Bender PT, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:5–20.
  • Copolillo AE. Use of mobility devices: The decision-making process of nine African-American older adults. Occup Ther J Res 2001;21:185–200.
  • Pettersson I, Appelros P, Ahlström G. Lifeworld perspectives utilizing assistive devices: individuals, lived experience following a stroke. Can J Occup Ther 2007;74:15–26.
  • Häggblom-Kronlöf G, Sonn U. Use of assistive devices–a reality full of contradictions In elderly persons’ everyday life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:335–345.
  • Gooberman-Hill R, Ebrahim S. Making decisions about simple interventions: older people’s use of walking aids. Age Ageing 2007;36:569–573.
  • Strohschein FJ, Bergman H, Carnevale FA, Loiselle CG. Patient decision making among older individuals with cancer. Qual Health Res 2011;21:900–926.
  • Hughes B, Paterson K. The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil Soc 1997;12:325–340
  • Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge; 2006.
  • Standal ØF. Relations of meaning: A phenomenologically oriented case study of learning bodies In a rehabilitation context [dissertation]. Oslo; Norwegian school of sport sciences; 2009.
  • Toombs SK. The meaning of illness. A phenomenological account of the different perspectives of physicians and patient. 1st ed. Dorndrecht: Kluwer academic publisher; 1993.
  • Dunlop DD, Hughes SL, Manheim LM. Disability In activities of daily living: patterns of change and a hierarchy of disability. Am J Public Health 1997;87:378–383.
  • Gadamer HG. Truth and method. 2nd ed. London New York:Continuum; 2006.
  • van Manen M. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. 1st ed. State university of New York press; 1990.
  • Charmaz K. The self as habit: the reconstruction of self In chronic illness. Occup Ther J Res 2002;22:31–41.
  • Wallenbert I, Jonsson H. Waiting to get better: a dilemma regarding habits In daily occupations after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2005;59:218–224.
  • Hedberg-Kristensson E, Ivanoff SD, Iwarsson S. Participation In the prescription process of mobility devices: experiences among older patients. Br J Occup Ther 2006;69:169–176.
  • Kannus P, Sievänen H, Palvanen M, Järvinen T, Parkkari J. Prevention of falls and consequent injuries In elderly people. Lancet 2005;366:1885–1893.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.