154
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Validating a model of row–column scanning

, &
Pages 321-329 | Received 06 Jun 2012, Accepted 11 Aug 2012, Published online: 18 Oct 2012

References

  • Anson DK. Alternative computer access: a guide to selection. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company; 1997. p 280.
  • Koester H, Levine SP. Modeling the speed of text entry with a word prediction interface. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1994;2(3):177–187.
  • Lesher GW, et al. Acquisition of scanning skills: The use of an adpative scanning delay algorithm across four scanning displays., in RESNA 2002 Annual Conference 2002. Minneapolis, MN: RESNA Press; pp 75–77.
  • Lesher GW, Rinkus GJ. Leveraging word prediction to improve character prediction in a scanning configuration, in RESNA 2002 Annual Conference 2002. Minneapolis, MN: RESNA Press.
  • Simpson RC, Koester HH. Adaptive one-switch row-column scanning. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1999;7:464–473.
  • Mankowski RE. Predicting Communication Rates: Efficacy of a Scanning Model. Pittsburgh, PA: Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology 2009, University of Pittsburgh.
  • Simpson R, Koester H, LoPresti E. Selecting an appropriate scan rate: the “.65 rule”. Assist Technol 2007;19:51–8; quiz 59.
  • Simpson RC, Koester HH, LoPresti EF. Evaluation of an adaptive row/column scanning system. Technol Disabil 2007;18(3):127–138.
  • Higginbotham DJ, Shane H, Russell S, Caves K. Access to AAC: present, past, and future. Augment Altern Commun 2007;23:243–257.
  • Angelo J. Comparison of three computer scanning modes as an interface method for persons with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:217–222.
  • Horstmann HM. Quantitative Modeling in Augmentative Communication – A Case Study, in RESNA ‘90 Annual Conference 1990. Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
  • Abascal J, Gardeazabal L, Garay-Vitoria N. Optimisation of the Selection Set Features for Scanning Text Input, in Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Miesenberger K, et al., editors. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp 788–795.
  • Bhattacharya S, Basu A, Samanta D. Computational modeling of user errors for the design of virtual scanning keyboards. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:400–409.
  • Bhattacharya S, Samanta D, Basu A. User errors on scanning keyboards: empirical study, model and design principles. Interacting with Computers 2008;20:406–418.
  • Bhattacharya S, Samanta D, Basu A. Performance models for automatic evaluation of virtual scanning keyboards. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:510–519.
  • Damper RI. Text composition by the physically disabled: a rate prediction model for scanning input. Appl Ergon 1984;15:289–296.
  • Lesher GW, Moulton BJ, Higginbotham DJ. Techniques for augmenting scanning communication. Augment Altern Commun 1998;14(2):81–101.
  • Venkatagiri HS. Efficient keyboard layouts for sequential access in augmentative and alternative communication. Augment Altern Commun 1999;15(2):126–134.
  • Simpson RC, Mankowski RE, Koester HH. Modeling one-switch row-column scanning with errors and error correction methods. Open Rehabilitation J 2011;4:1–12.
  • MacKenzie S, Soukoreff W. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. in CHI ‘03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA: ACM Press; 2003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.