Building an ontology for assistive technology using the Delphi method

References

• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – ICF. Word Health Organization (2001). Retrieved from the Word Wide Web: http://www.who.int/classification/icf/intros/ICF-Eng-Intro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach JE. ICIDH-2 and the role of environmental factors in the creation of disability. In: Buhler C, Knops H, editors. Assistive technology on the threshold of the new millenium. The Netherlands: IOS Press; 1999. pp 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – ICF. World Health Organization. (2001). Retrieved October, 2009 from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–364.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Collaborating Center for the FIC in the Netherlands. International Organization for Standardization: New features in the 2001 version of ISO 999. Newsletter WHO-FIC 2010;8:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, De Witte LP. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:146–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Coombs FK, Hansen NK. Policy issues in evaluating and selecting assistive technology and other resources for persons with disabilities. In: Menz FE, Thomas DF, editors. Bridging gaps: refining the disability research agenda for rehabilitation and the social sciences – conference proceedings. Menomonie: University of Wisconsin-Stout; 2003. pp 165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Rose DH, Meyer A. Teaching every student in the digital age: universal design for learning. Alexandria: ASCD; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bain BK. Assistive technology in srapy. In: Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Boyt Schell BA, editors. Occupational therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp 659–675.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanoff SD, Iwarsson S, Sonn U. Occupational therapy research on assistive technology and physical environmental issues: a literature review. Can J Occup Ther 2006;73:109–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lahm E, Sizemore L. Factors that influence assistive technology decision making. J Spec Edu Tech 2002;17:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gailey RS. Predictive outcome measures versus functional outcome measures in the lower limb amputee. J Prosthet Orthot 2006;18:51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technology matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington: APA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods Inf Med 1998;37:394–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:731–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004;11:229–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Pape TLB. Coping and adjustment. In: Scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington: APA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ, Burgess AR. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Lambrou R. Satisfaction and comfort. In: Scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington: APA; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RO. Integrated multi-intervention paradigm for assessment and application of concurrent treatments, (IMPACT2) Model. Milwaukee: R2D2 Center; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Long TM, Woolverton M, Perry DF, Thomas MJ. Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. Am J Occup Ther 2007;61:345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl Acquis 1993;5:199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Hussey SM. Assistive technology: principles and practice (3rd ed). St. Louis: Mosby; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Berner E, Maisiak R, Galt K. Solutions in the non-peer-reviewed literature for reducing medication errors. J Pharmaceut Financ Eco Policy 2007;15:7–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jenko M, Matjacic Z, Vidmar G, Bester J, Pogacnikb M, Zupan A. A method for selection of appropriate assistive technology for computer access. Int J Rehabil Res 2010;33:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill ES, Dluhy NM, Fortier PJ, Michel HE. Knowledge acquisition, synthesis, and validation: a model for decision support systems. J Adv Nurs 2004;47:134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Schon D. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber T. Ontology. In: Liu L, Özsu T, editors. Encyclopedia of database systems. Berlín: Springer-Verlag; 2009. pp 1963–1965.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia A, O’Neill K, Garcia LJ, Lord P, Stevens R, Corcho O, Gibson F. Developing ontologies withing decentralized settings. In: Chen H, Wang Y, Cheung K, editors. Berlín: Springer-Verlag; 2010. pp 99–139.
   Google Scholar
• Simperl E, Tempich C. Exploring the economical aspects of ontology. In: Staaband S, Studer R, editors. Handbook on ontologies. Berlín: Springer-Verlag; 2009. pp 337–358.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon T, Chang E, Hadzic M. (2008). Ontology support for biomedical information resources, cbms. 21st IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. Finland: University of Jyväskylä. pp 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Karim S, Tjoa AM. (2006). Towards the use of ontologies for improving the user Interaction for people with special needs. In: Proceedings of ICCHP (10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (4061). Linz, Austria: Springer; 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Dionysios K, Dimitrios G, Dimitrios T. (2008). An ontology-based framework for integrating web services for mobility impaired users. The ASK-IT International Conference. Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Holsapple CW, Joshi KD. A collaborative approach to ontology design. Commun ACM 2002;45:42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey NC, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 1963;9:458–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C, Sandford B. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Evaluat 2007;12:1–8. Retrieved September 9, 2009, from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2006;53:205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung HL, Altschuld JW, Lee YF. Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation. Eval Program Plann 2008;31:191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppestad BS. Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: an overview of the current literature. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:189–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaffalitzky E. Optimising the prescription and use of lower limb prosthetic technology: a mixed methods approach (PhD thesis). Dublin: Dublin City University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey NC. An experimental study of group opinion. Futures 1969;1:408–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domholdt E. Physical therapy research: principles and applications (2nd ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Young SJ, Jamieson LM. (2001). Delivery methodology of the Delphi: a comparison of two approaches. J Park Recreat Adm 2001;1:42–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig B. Predicting the future: have you considered using the Delphi methodology? J Ext 1997;35:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenkle DH, Piercy FP, editors. Research methods in family therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer J. New look at education. Poughkeepsie: Odyssey Press; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver WT. The Delphi forecasting method. Phi Delta Kappan 1971;52:267–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey NC, Rourke DL. Experimental assessment of Delphi procedures with group value judgments; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Anglin L. Instructional technology past, present and future. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited, Inc; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Yousuf MI. Using experts’ opinions through Delphi technique. Practical Assess Res Eval 2007;12:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• DE Villiers MR, DE Villiers PJT, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teacher 2005;27:639–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielandt T, Mckenna K, Tooth L, Strong J. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (AT). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:29–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, Geertzen JH, Postema K, Van Limbeek J. From satisfaction to expectation: the patient’s perspective in lower limb prosthetic care. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1049–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger ME, Cieza A, Stoll J, Stucki G, Huber EO. Identification of intervention categories for physical therapy, based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a Delphi exercise. Phys Ther 2006;86:1203–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry K, Maes B, Vlaskamp C. Operationalizing quality of life for people with profound multiple disabilities: a Delphi study. J Intellect Disabil Res 2007;51:334–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Community 1999;7:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avery AJ, Savelyich BS, Sheikh A, Cantrill J, Morris CJ, Fernando B, Bainbridge M et al. Identifying and establishing consensus on the most important safety features of GP computer systems: e-Delphi study. Inform Prim Care 2005;13:3–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pope C, van Royen P, Baker R. Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:425–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green P. The content of a college-level outdoor leadership course. Paper presented at the Conference of the Northwest District Association for the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. Spokane; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur A. (2008). Ontology and its tools (Maste thesis). Patiala: Thapar University.
   Google Scholar
• Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M, Gomez-Perz A. (2003). Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data Knowledge Engineer 46, 41–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester HH, LoPresti EF. Compass: software for computer skills assessment. CSUN’s 18h Annual Conference “Technology and Persons with Disabilities”; Los Angeles, CA, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont C, Mazar B. Assessment of computer task performance version 2. Quebec City: University LAVAL; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Frewer LJ, Salter B, Lambert N. Understanding patients’ preferences for treatment: the need for innovative methodologies. Qual Health Care 2001;10 Suppl 1:i50–i54.
   Google Scholar
• Koch GG. “Intraclass correlation coefficient”. In: Kotz SS, Johnson NL. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982. pp 213–217.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research applications to practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc; 2000:560–567.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq A, Van de Ven A, Gustafson D. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Martino J. Technological forecasting for decision-making (2nd ed). New York: Elsevier; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone HA. The Delphi technique. In: Fowles RB, editor. Handbook of futures research. Westport: Greenwood Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe G, Wright G, Bolger F. The Delphi technique: a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1991;39:235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher T, Colton S. Using the internet to improve HRD research: the case of the Web-based Delphi research technique to achieve content validity of an HRD-oriented measurement. J Eur Indust Train 2007;31:570–587.
   Google Scholar
• Guangyi X, Chongsuvivatwong V, Geater A, Ming L, Yun Z. Application of Delphi technique in identification of appropriate screening questions for chronic low back pain from traditional Chinese medicine experts’ opinions. J Altern Complement Med 2009;15:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LR. Rating scales and checklists: Evaluating behavior personality and attitudes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford JP, Fruchter B. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa K, Caro J. (2011). A real-time web-based delphi study on ICT integration framework in basic education. In: proceeding of CSIT International Conference on Telecommunication Technology and Applications. Singapore: IACSIT Press. pp 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Skutsch M, Hall D. Delphi: potential uses in education planning. In: Barnes JL. An international study of curricular organizers for the study of technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Czinkota MR, Ronkainen IA. International business and trade in the next decade: report from a Delphi study. J Intern Bus 1997;28;458–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoli C, Pawlowski D. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information Manag 2004;42:15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara L, De Souza LH, Ide L. A Delphi study of self-care in a community population of people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneke U, Northey S, Knapp M, Bhugra D, Crowe M, Smith S. (2005). Prescribing for erectile dysfunction: a Delphi based consensus study. Sexual Relatsh Ther;20:181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer O. Looking forward: A guide to future research. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Landeta J. (2006). Current validity of the Deslphi method in social sciences. Tech Forecast and Soc Change;73:467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Schell BAB, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:1243–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam J, Burke J. Organizing and managing classroom learning communities. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Doolittle G, Sudeck M, Rattigan P. (2008). Creating professional learning communities: The work of professional development schools. Theory into Practice; 47: 303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RESNA. (2012). Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America. RESNA policies and procedures for the development of RESNA assistive technology standards. Arlington: RESNA. Retrieved July 2012: http://web.resna.org/atStandards/documents/RESNAProceduresFinal2012-02-01.pdf
   Google Scholar