Robot-assisted assessment of vibration perception and localization on the hand

References

• Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 2010;33:89–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aglioti S, Beltramello A, Bonazzi A, Corbetta C. Thumb-pointing is humans after damage to somatic sensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1996;109:92–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidoni ED, Boyd LA. Preserved motor learning after stroke is related to the degree of proprioceptive deficit. Behav Brain Funct 2009;5:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abela E, Missimer J, Wiest R, Federspiel A, Hess C, Sturzenegger M, Weder B. Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e31275.
   Google Scholar
• Carey JR. Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Rehabil Med 1995;7:51–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S. Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. Stroke 1996;27:677–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusoffsky A, Wadell I, Nilsson BY. The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14:27–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell-Krotoski J, Weinstein S, Weinstein C. Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration. J Hand Ther 1993;6:114–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane `base Syst Rev 2009;40:e392–e393.
   Google Scholar
• Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, Wee SK, Kuah CW, Chua KS, Gassert R, Milner TE, Teo CL, Burdet E. Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:63–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluet M, Lambercy O, Gassert R. Upper limb assessment using a virtual peg insertion test. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011;2011;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer BR, Klatzky R, Matsuoka Y. Visual feedback distortion in a robotic environment for hand rehabilitation. Brain Res Bull 2008;75:804–813.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan HZ, Srinivasan MA, Reed CM, Durlach NI. Discrimination and identification of finger joint-angle position using active motion. ACM Trans Appl Percept, 4, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Panarese A, Edin BB. Human ability to discriminate direction of three-dimensional force stimuli applied to the finger pad. J Neurophysiol 2011;105:541–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith AM, Chapman CE, Donati F, Fortier-Poisson P, Hayward V. Perception of simulated local shapes using active and passive touch. J Neurophysiol 2009;102:3519–3529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins M, Bensmaïa SJ, Roy EA. Vibrotaction and texture perception. Behav Brain Res 2002;135:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka M, Griffin MJ. Thresholds for the perception of hand-transmitted vibration: dependence on contact area and contact location. Somatosens Mot Res 2005;22:281–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley I, Kim Y, Lee J, Ryu J. Determining the feasibility of forearm mounted vibrotactile displays Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, International Symposium, Arlington VA, USA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jones LA, Kunkel J, Piateski E. Vibrotactile pattern recognition on the arm and back. Perception 2009;38:52–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggan E, Anwar S, Brewster SA. Mobile multi-actuator tactile displays. Haptic Audio inter Des 2007;4813:22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lambercy O, Robles AJ, Kim Y, Gassert R. Design of a robotic device for assessment and rehabilitation of hand sensory function. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo S, Chapuis D, Santos-Carreras L, Kim Y, Retornaz P, Bleuler H, Gassert R. Augmented white cane with multimodal haptic feedback. Proc. IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2010;149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann R, Maeder W, Glauser D, Clavel R. The pantoscope: a spherical remote-center-of-motion parallel manipulator for force reroection. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1997;718–723.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi H. Bonferroni and Sidak corrections for multiple comparison. Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens JC, Choo KK. Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 1996;13:153–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:345–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Bermudez F, Johnson KO. Differences in spatial acuity between digits. Neurology 2001;56:1389–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Matyas TA. Frequency of discriminative sensory loss in the hand after stroke in a rehabilitation setting. J Rehabil Med 2011;43:257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbash P, MacKenzie IS, Buxton W. Human performance using computer input devices in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Proc. of the ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1993;474–481.
   Google Scholar
• Bekesy GV. Funneling in the nervous system and its role in loudness and sensation intensity on the skin. J Acoust Soc Am 1958;30:399–412.
   Google Scholar
• Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol NeuroSur Psych 1993;56:241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinse HR, Kleibel N, Kalisch T, Ragert P, Wilimzig C, Tegenthoff M. Tactile coactivation resets age-related decline of human tactile discrimination. Ann Neurol 2006;60:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalisch T, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR. Improvement of sensorimotor functions in old age by passive sensory stimulation. Clin Interv Aging 2008;3:673–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PS, Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Johnson M, Walker-Batson D. Effects of repetitive electrical stimulation to treat sensory loss in persons poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009;90:2108–2111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey L, Macdonell R, Matyas TA. Sense: study of the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation on sensation: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;35:304–313.
   Google Scholar