BNCI systems as a potential assistive technology: ethical issues and participatory research in the BrainAble project

References

• Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces as new brain output pathways. J Physiol 2007;579:613–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, et al. Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:767–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cincotti F, Mattia D, Aloise F, et al. Non-invasive brain-computer interface system: towards its application as assistive technology. Brain Res Bull 2008;75:796–803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller G, Muller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Neuper C. Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems. Computer 2008;41:58–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1032–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh PJ, Ware MP, Lightbody G. Brain Computer Interfaces for Inclusion. AH10, 1st International Augmented Human Conference Article 6:1–8 Megeve, France; 2010. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1785455 [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Kleih SC, Nijboer F, Halder S, Kubler A. Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain-computer interface use. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:1023–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison B, Luth T, Valbuena D, et al. BCI demographics: how many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18:107–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guger C, Daban S, Sellers E, et al. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci Lett 2009;462:94–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volosyak I, Valbuena D, Luth T, et al. BCI demographics II: how many (and what kinds of) people can use a high-frequency SSVEP BCI? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011;19:232–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Allison BZ, Dunne S, et al. A preliminary survey on the perception of marketability of brain-computer interfaces and initial development of a repository of BCI companies. 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference, BCI 2011 Graz, Austria; 2011. Available from: http://doc.utwente.nl/78138/ [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• van Erp J, Lotte F, Tangermann M. Brain-computer interfaces: beyond medical applications. Computer 2012;45:26–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubler A, Muller K-R. An introduction to brain--computer interfacing. In: Dornhege G, Millan J, Hinterberger T, McFarland D, Muller K-R, eds. Towards brain-computer interfacing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:1–25
   Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller G, Allison BZ, Brunner C, et al. The hybrid BCI. Front Neurosci 2010;4:42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future BNCI. Future BNCI: A Roadmap for future directions in brain/neuronal computer interaction research. Graz: Future BNCI Project; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Guger C, Edlinger G, Krausz G. Hardware/software components and applications of BCIs. In: Fazel-Rezai R, ed. Recent advances in brain-computer interface systems. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2011:1–25
   Google Scholar
• Brunner C, Allison BZ, Krusienski DJ, et al. Improved signal processing approaches in an offline simulation of a hybrid brain-computer interface. J Neurosci Methods 2010;188:165–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro AA, Ceccaroni L, Velickovski F, et al. Context-awareness as an enhancement of brain-computer interfaces. Ambient Assisted Living (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6693). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011:216–23
   Google Scholar
• Riis P. Neuroethics. Eur J Neurol 2003;10:218–23
   Google Scholar
• Tamburrini G. Brain to computer communication: ethical perspectives on interaction models. Neuroethics 2009;2:137–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpe PR. Ethical and social challenges of brain-computer interfaces. Virtual Mentor 2007;9:128–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haselager P, Vlek R, Hill J, Nijboer F. A note on ethical aspects of BCI. Neural Networks 2009;22:1352–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. J Physiol 2007;579:637–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (Declaration of Helsinki) 2008. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• ETICA. ETICA: Ethical issues of emerging ICT applications. EiEX: J Eur Innovation Exchange 3; 2010. Available from: http://www.eiex.eu/docs/EIEX03ETICA01-05.pdf [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• EGAIS. EGAIS: The Ethics of Technology. EiEX: J Eur Innovation Exchange 7; 2011. Available from: http://www.eiex.eu/docs/EIEX05EGAIS.pdf [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• CORDIS. Ethical Guidelines for undertaking ICT research in FP7; 2010. Available from: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/guidelines-annex5ict.pdf [last accessed 23 Nov 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Folkes C, Carmichael P. Learning to assess and assessing to learn: the construction of knowledge about assistive technology. Educat Action Res 2006;14:535--45
   Google Scholar
• Folkes C. Last voices: an exploration of the nature of assistive technology interventions for people with MND. 2004 MA Dissertation, University of Reading, UK
   Google Scholar
• Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:5–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanagasi HA, Gurvit IH, Ermutlu N, et al. Cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: evidence from neuropsychological investigation and event-related potentials. Cogn Brain Res 2002;14:234–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lomen-Hoerth C, Murphy J, Langmore S, et al. Are amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients cognitively normal? Neurology 2003;60:1094–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong MJ. The syndromes of frontotemporal dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2008;9:323–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers E, Schalk G, Donchin E. The P300 as a typing tool: tests of brain computer interface with an. ALS patient. Psychophysiology 2003;40:s77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forn C, Belenguer A, Parcet-Ibars MA, Avila C. Information-processing speed is the primary deficit underlying the poor performance of multiple sclerosis patients in the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30:789–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speakbook. Speakbook: Nonprofit Communication Tools; 2011. Available from: http://www.speakbook.org/
   Google Scholar
• Olsson E. What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interact Comput 2004;16:377–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar