Identifying participation needs of people with acquired brain injury in the development of a collective community smart home

References

• Boucher N, Lanctôt C. Pour un milieu de vie stimulant et une participation sociale accrue des personnes ayant un traumatisme cranio-cérébral. Research report written for the Regroupement des Associations de Personnes Traumatisées Cranio-Cérébrales du Québec; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Gillepsie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012;18:1–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbleLink Technologies. Visual Impact 3. Available from: http://ablelinktech.com/index.php?id=130 2015 [last accessed 19 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• LoPresti E, Mihailidis A, Kirsch N. Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art [Electronic version]. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2004;14:5–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauchet J, Giroux S, Pigot H, et al. Pervasive assistance for people with intellectual disabilities in smart homes: a case study on meal preparation. IJARM 2008;9:53–65
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, Evans JJ. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomized control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:477–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Song Y, Levinson R, Kautz H. Interactive activity recognition and prompting to assist people with cognitive disabilities. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 2012;4:443–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Bier N, Pigot H, et al. Electronic organiser and Alzheimer’s disease: fact or fiction? Neuropsychol Rehabil 2014;24:71–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Bier N, Pigot H, et al. Development of a personalized electronic organizer for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: the AP@lz. Gerontechnology 2010;9:293
   Google Scholar
• Patenaude J, Legault G-A, Beauvais J, et al. Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies. Science Eng Ethics 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Pigot H, Savary JP, Metzger JL, et al. Advanced technology guidelines to fulfill the needs of the cognitively impaired population. Magog, Quebec, Canada:IOS Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Rialle V. Technologie et Alzheimer: appréciation de la faisabilité de la mise en place de technologies innovantes pour assister les aidants familiaux et pallier les pathologies de type Alzheimer. Paris: Université René Descates-Paris 5; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Dolbec A, Clément J. La recherche-action. In: Karsenti T, Savoie-Zajc L, eds. Introduction à la recherche en éducation. Sherbrooke: Éditions du CRP; 2000:199–224
   Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA. Analyse des données qualitatives. 2nd ed. Paris, France: De Boeck; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. Le funambule, le fil et la toile. Transformations réciproques du sens du handicap [The tightrope walker, wire and canvas. Reciprocal transformations of the meaning of disability]. Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université Laval; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Fleming J. Growth through loss after brain injury. Brain Impairment 2011;12:79–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor M, Mattingly C. The complexities embedded in family centered care. Am J Occup Ther 1998;52:259–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H, Pelchat D, Swaine B, et al. The experiences of individuals with a traumatic brain injury, families, physicians and health professionals regarding care provided throughout the continuum. Brain Injury 2005;19:585–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte ML. Disablement, context, and quality of life after brain injury: measuring what matters. Dissertation thesis. Queen's University; Kingston, Ontario (Quebec, Canada); 1999 http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp02/NQ42964.pdf [last accessed March 19, 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D. Subjective quality-of-life predictors for older adults with physical disabilities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:830–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, St-Cyr Tribble D, Desrosiers J. Meaning of quality of life for older adults: importance of human functioning components. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;49:e91–100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maier H, Klumb PL. Social participation and survival at older ages: is the effect driven by activity content or context. Eur J Ageing 2005;2:31–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado BE, Del Ser T, Otero A. Social networks, social integration, and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2003;58:S93–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avlund K, Damsgaard MT, Osler M. Social position and functional decline among non-disabled old men and women. Eur J Public Health 2004;14:212–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath PA, Deeg DJ. Social engagement and health outcomes among older people: introduction to a special section. Eur J Ageing 2005;2:24–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett KM. Social engagement as a longitudinal predictor of objective and subjective health. Eur J Ageing 2005;2:48–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abu-Rayya HM. Depression and social involvement among elders. Internet J Health 2006;5. Available from: https://ispub.com/IJH/5/1/10692# [last accessed 19 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Van Willigen M. Differential benefits of volunteering across the life course. J Gerontol Series B: Psychol Sci Social Sci 2000;55:S308–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie L, Wright-St Clair VA, Keogh J, Gray M. Community integration after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:163–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, et al. Long term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:253–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Larivière N, Royer N, et al. Match between needs and services for participation of older adults receiving home care: appraisals and challenges. Leadersh Health Care 2014;27:1–18
   Google Scholar
• Zakrajsek AG, Schuster E, Guenther D, Lorenz K. Exploring older adult care transitions from hospital to home: a participatory action research project. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2013;31:328–44
   Google Scholar
• Balcazar FE, Keys CB, Kaplan DL, Suarez-Balcazar Y. Participatory action research and people with disabilities: principles and challenges. Can J Rehabil 1998;12:105–12
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H, Levert M-J. The close relatives of people who have had a traumatic brain injury and their special needs. Brain Injury 2012;26:1084–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laperrière A. Les critères de scientificité des méthodes qualitatives. In: Morin G, Poupart J, Deslauriers J-P, et al, eds. La recherche qualitative: Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques. Montréal, Québec:Université de Montréal, Centre International de Criminologie Appliquée; 1997:392–418
   Google Scholar