Exploring assistive technology and post-school outcomes for students with severe disabilities

References

• Creapeau-Hobson F, Vujeva H. Assessment of cognitive ability of students with severe and low-incidence disabilities – part 1. Communiqué 2012;41:12–13
   Google Scholar
• Creapeau-Hobson F, Vujeva H. Assessment of cognitive ability of students with severe and low-incidence disabilities – part 2. Communiqué 2012;41:4–6
   Google Scholar
• Lane KL, Carter EW, Sisco L. Professional involvement in self-determination instruction for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children 2012;78:237–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAST [Internet]. Curriculum access for students with low-incidence disabilities: the promise of UDL; 2010. Available from: http://aim.cast.org/learn/historyarchive/backgroundpapers/promise_of_udl/what_l-i_d [last accessed 18 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Use of a team-based approach to assistive technology assessment and planning for children with multiple disabilities: a pilot study. Assist Technol 2004;19:109–25
   Google Scholar
• Langone J. Technology for individuals with severe disabilities. In: Lindsey JD ed. Technology and exceptional individuals. 4th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2008:415–44
   Google Scholar
• Reichle J. Evaluating assistive technology in the education of persons with severe disabilities. J Behav Educ 2011;20:77–85
   Google Scholar
• Westling DL, Fox L. Teaching students with severe disabilities. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108–446, 108
   Google Scholar
• Blackhurst A. Historical perspectives about technology applications for people with disabilities. In: Edyburn D, Higgins K, Boone R, eds. Handbook of special education technology research and practice. Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design; 2005:3–30
   Google Scholar
• Alper S, Raharinirina S. Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: a review and synthesis of the literature. J Spec Educ Technol 2006;21:48–64
   Google Scholar
• Woodward J, Rieth H. A historical review of technology research in special education. Rev Educ Res 1997;67:503–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S, Jones E. The obligation to provide assistive technology: enhancing general curriculum access. J Law Educ 1999;28:247–65
   Google Scholar
• Quinn B, Behrmann M, Mastropieri M, et al. Who is using assistive technology in schools? J Spec Educ Technol 2009;24:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int 2004;11:229–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derer K, Polsgrove L, Rieth H. A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. J Spec Educ Technol 1996;13:62–80
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML. National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Ment Retard 1998;36:44–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ayres KM, Mechling L, Sansosti FJ. The use of mobile technologies to assistive with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: consideration for the future of school psychology. Psychol Schools 2013;50:259–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston SS, Evans J. Considering response efficiency as a strategy to prevent assistive technology abandonment. J Spec Educ Technol 2005;20:45–50
   Google Scholar
• Parette HP, VanBiervliet A, Hourcade JJ. Family-centered decision making in assistive technology. J Spec Educ Technol 2000;15:45–55
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Smith SJ, Palmer SM, Davies DK. Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol 2004;19:7–21
   Google Scholar
• Hutinger PL, Johanson J, Stoneburner R. Assistive technology applications in education programs of children with multiple disabilities: a case study report on the state of the practice. J Spec Educ Technol 1996;13:16–35
   Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. Utilization of computer technology to facilitate money management by individuals with mental retardation. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2003;38:106–12
   Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:377–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB, Smith SJ, et al. Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta analysis. J Vocat Rehabil 2006;24:81–6
   Google Scholar
• Taber TA, Alberto PA, Fredrick LD. Use of self-operated auditory prompts by workers with moderate mental retardation to transition independently though vocational tasks. Res Dev Disabil 1998;19:327–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laarhoven T, Johnson JW, Van Laarhoven-Myers T, et al. The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. J Behav Educ 2009;18:119–41
   Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML. Enhancing in- dependent task performance for individuals with mental retardation through use of a handheld self-directed visual and audio prompting system. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil 2002;37:209–18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furniss F, Lancioni F, Rocha N, et al. Development and evaluation of a palmtop-based job aid for workers with severe developmental disabilities. Br J Educ Technol 2001;32:277–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling LC. Assistive technology as a self-management tools for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks: a literature review. Educ Train Dev Disabil 2007;43:252–69
   Google Scholar
• Bouck EC, Maeda Y, Flanagan S. Assistive technology and students with high incidence disabilities: understanding the relationship through the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Rem Spec Educ 2012;33:298–308
   Google Scholar
• Blackorby J, Cameto R, McCracken M, Valdes K. NLTS2 data training. Washington, DC: SRI International; 2009
   Google Scholar
• SRI International. Supporting statement for paperwork reduction act submission Part B: collections of information employing statistical methods. Department of Education Information Collection System. N.d. Available from: http://edicsweb.ed.gov/edics_files_web/03698/Att_Supporting%20Statement%20Part%20B.doc
   Google Scholar
• SRI International [Internet]. National Longitudinal Transition Study II (NLTS2): study design, timeline, and data collection plan; 2000. Available from: http://www.nlts2.org/studymeth/nlts2_design_timeline.pdf [last accessed 18 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Javitz H, Wagner M. Analysis of the potential basis in the sample of local educational agencies (LEAs) in the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2) sample; 2003 Available from: http://www.nlts2.org/studymeth/nlts2_analysis_bias_sample.pdf [last accessed 18 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M, Kutash K, Duchnowski AJ, Epstein MH. The special education elementary longitudinal study and the national longitudinal transition study: study designs and implications for children and youth with emotional disturbance. J Emot Behav Disord 2005;13:23–41
   Google Scholar
• Craddock, G. The AT continuum in education: novice to power user. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006;1:17–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007;2:1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marino M, Marino E, Shaw S. Making informed assistive technology decisions for students with high incidence disabilities. Teach Except Child 2006;38:18–25
   Google Scholar
• Wallace J. Assistive technology funding in the United States. Neuro Rehabil 2011;28:295–302
   Google Scholar
• Martinson M, Halpern J. Ethical implications of the promotion of elder volunteerism: a critical perspective. J Aging Stud 2011;25:427–35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Caregiver Alliance [Internet]. Fact sheets: caregiving issues and strategies. San Francisco, CA: National Center on Caregiving at Family Caregiver Alliance; 2009 Available from: http://www.caregiver.org/caregiver/jsp/content_node.jsp?nodeid=2313 [last accessed 18 Mar 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo MN, Jaquette O. Running in place: low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educ Eval Policy Anal 2011;33:318–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck EC. Secondary students with moderate/severe intellectual disabilities: considerations of curriculum and post-school outcomes from the NLTS2. J Intellect Disabil Res 2012;56:1175–86
   Google Scholar
• Brown L, McLean MB, Hamre-Nietupski S, et al. A strategy for developing chronological age-appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. J Spec Educ 1979;13:81–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton JR, Cronin ME, Jairrels V. Curricular implications of transition: life skills as an integral part of transition education. Remedial Spec Educ 1997;18:294–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar