Usability of clinical decision support system as a facilitator for learning the assistive technology adaptation process

References

• Schreuer N. Adaptations of computerized work environment and technology as facilitators for participation. Israel J Occup Therapy [Hebrew] 2005;14:H61–75
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. New York: Springer; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil 2000;66:44–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danial-Saad A, Kuflik T, Weiss PL, Schreuer N. Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for pointing device prescription. Am J Occupat Therapy 2015;69:6902280010p1–p7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danial-Saad A, Kuflik T, Tamar Weiss PL, Schreuer N. Building an ontology for assistive technology using the Delphi method. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol 2013;8:275–86
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berner ES, ed. Clinical decision support systems: theory and practice, 2nd ed. New York: Springer Health Informatics Series; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Shortliffe E, Cimino J. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. New York: Springer; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein K, Hoffman B. Hypertension recordkeeping and electronic management systems. In: Izzo J, Black E, eds. Hypertension primer: the essentials of high blood pressure. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:393–6
   Google Scholar
• Grosan A, Abraham A. Intelligent systems – a modern approach. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Karray FO, De Silva CW. Soft computing and intelligent systems design: theory, tools and applications. New York: Addison-Wesley; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Negnevitsky M. Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sasikumar M, Ramani S, Muthu Raman S, et al. A practical introduction to rule based expert systems. New Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Rebimbas J, Mourant R, Millis SR. Examining the usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assist Technol 2007;19:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson J. Usability engineering. San Diego (CA): Morgan Kaufmann; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. Proceedings of the ACM CHI' 94 Conference; 1994, April; Boston, MA; 24–8 p
   Google Scholar
• Choi YM, Sprigle SH. Approaches for evaluating the usability of assistive technology product prototypes. Assist Technol 2011;23:36–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor N, Boni O, Schreuer N. Occupational therapists as accessibility advisors: position paper. Israeli J Occup Therapy 2008;17:H5–8 (Hebrew)
   Google Scholar
• Kreitzberg CB. The LUCID framework: an introduction. Princeton Junction (NJ): Cognetics Corporation; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Carroll JM, Olson JR, Anderson N, eds. Mental models in human-computer interaction: research issues about what the user of software knows. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Norman DA. The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Dillon A. Beyond usability: process, outcome and affect in human-computer interactions. Can J Libr Infor Sci 2002;26:57–69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opperman R. User interface design. In: Adelsberger HH, Collis B, Pawlowski JM, eds. Handbook on information technologies for education and training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2002:233–48
   Google Scholar
• Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004;37:56–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushniruk A. Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Comput Biol Med 2002;32:141–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke J. SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, eds. Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996:189–94
   Google Scholar
• Zviran M, Glezer C, Avni I. User satisfaction from commercial web sites: the effect of design and use. Inform Manage 2006; 43:157–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 2008;24:574–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafton J, Martins S, Michel M, et al. Designing an automated clinical decision support system to match clinical practice guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic pain. Implement Sci 2010;5:1--11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsci S, Federici S, Lauriola M. On the dimensionality of the system usability scale: a test of alternative measurement models. Cogn Process 2009;10:193–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber C, Haniff DJ, Woolley SI. Contrasting paradigms for the development of wearable computers. IBM Syst J 1999;38:551–65
   Google Scholar
• Rolston DW. Principles of artificial intelligence and expert systems development. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner L. Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Method, Instr Comput 2003;35:379–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M; EBMeDS Study Group. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Fam Pract 2008;25:162–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, et al. Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. Br Med J 2003;326:314–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:357–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng K, Padman R, Johnson MP, Diamond HS. Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:535–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar