References
- Stumbom NJ, Martin JK, Hedrck B. Assistive technology: impact on education, employment, and independence of individuals with physical disabilities. J Vocation Rehabil. 2009;30:99–110.
- Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11:229–243.
- Hemmingson H, Lidstrom H, Nygard L. Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools: students’ perspectives. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:463–472.
- Blan-Moraes S, Schaff R, Gruis KL, et al. Barriers to and mediators of brain–computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings. Ergonomics. 2012;55:516–525.
- Neuper C, Muller GR, Kubler A, et al. Clinical application of an EEG-based brain–computer interface: a case study in a patient with severe motor impairment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:399–409.
- L’ecuyer A, Lotte F, Reilly R, et al. Brain–computer interfaces, virtual reality and videogames. IEEE Comput. 2008;41:66–72.
- Taherian S, Seletiskiy D, Pau J, et al. Training to use a commercial brain–computer interface as access technology: a case study. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.967313.
- Kondo T, Saeki M, Hayashi Y, et al. Effect of instructive visual stimuli on neurofeedback training for motor imagery-based brain–computer interface. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;43:239–249.
- Lievesly R, Wozencroft M, Ewins D. The Emotiv EPOC neuroheadset: an inexpensive method of controlling assistive technologies using facial expressions and thoughts? J Assist Technol. 2011;5:67–82.
- Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Flotzinger D, et al. EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103:642–651.
- Daly I, Billinger M, Laparra-Hernandez J, et al. On the control of brain–computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:1787–1797.
- Nijboer F, Birbaumer N, Kubler A. The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain–computer interface performance with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – a longitudinal study. Front Neurosci. 2010;4:1–13.
- Scherer R, Billinger M, Wagner J, et al. Thought-based row-column scanning communication board for individuals with cerebral palsy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58:14–22.
- Holz EM, Kaufmann T, Desideri L, et al. User centred design in BCI development. In: Towards practical brain–computer interfaces. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p 155–72.
- Mason SG, Bashashati A, Fatourechi M, et al. A comprehensive survey of brain interface technology designs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007;35:137–169.
- Parette HP, Peterson-Karlan GR, Smith S, et al. The state of assistive technology: themes from an outcomes summit. Assist Technol Outcomes Benefits. 2006;3:15–33.
- Riemer-Reiss M, Wacker R. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2002;66:44–50.
- Krusienski DJ, Grosse-Wentrup M, Galan F, et al. Critical issues in state-of-the-art brain–computer interface signal processing. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:025002
- Wander JD, Blakely T, Miller KJ, et al. Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain–computer interface task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;110:10463–10464.
- Allison BZ, Neuper C. Could anyone use a BCI? In: Tan DS, Nijholt A, editors. Brain–computer interfaces. London: Springer; 2010. p. 35–54.
- Blankertz B, Sannelli C, Halder S, et al. Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance. NeuroImage. 2010;51:1303–1309.
- Guger C, Allison BZ, Großwindhager B, et al. How many people could use an SSVEP BCI? Front Neurosci. 2012;6:169. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00169.eCollection 2012.