Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation

References

• Greenwald BD, Burnett DM, Miller MA. Congenital and acquired brain injury. 1. Brain injury: epidemiology and pathophysiology. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:S3–S7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABIKUS. [Internet]. ABIKUS evidence based recommendations for rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injury. Toronto, ON: ABIKUS Guideline Development Group; 2007; [cited 2011 Jul 3]. Available from: http://www.abiebr.com/abikus.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen N, Meyer MJ, Aubut J, et al. [Internet]. Efficacy and models of care following an acquired brain injury. Evidence-based review of moderate to severe brain injury. 6th ed. Toronto, ON: ERABI Research Group; 2009; [cited 2011 Jul 3]. Available from http://www.abiebr.com/module/3-efficacy-and-models-care-following-acquired-brain-injury.
   Google Scholar
• Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toglia J, Kirk U. Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury. Neurorehabilitation. 2000;15:57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe KM, Polissar L, Fay GC, et al. Recovery trends over three years following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte J. Directions in brain injury research: from concept to clinical implementation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19:807–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall S, Teasell R, Bayona N, et al. Motor impairment rehabilitation post acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21:133–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Sveistrup H, Rand D, et al. Video capture virtual reality: a decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14:307–321.
   Google Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Using virtual reality in clinical practice: a multi-site exploratory study. Neurorehabilitation. 2014;35:563–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, et al. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:12–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8:187–211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Tatla SK, Holsti L. The GestureTek virtual reality system in rehabilitation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol Technol. 2013;9:89–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, et al. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Professions Act [Internet]. Victoria, BC: Queen’s Printer; 2014 Dec 10; [cited 2014 Dec 31]. Available from: http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96183_01.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res. 1995;6:144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Holsti L, Velikonja D, et al. Factors influencing therapists' adoption of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16:385–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson A, Estabrooks CA. Educational theories. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 206–214.
   Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID. Knowledge to action: what it is and what it isn’t. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Scott SD, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CA, Roop SC, Pohar SL, et al. Translating knowledge in rehabilitation: systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015;95:663–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1024–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, et al. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implement Sci. 2012;7:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah G, Rossy D, Ploeg J, et al. Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring as a knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014;11:284–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R. Selecting, tailoring, and implementing knowledge translation interventions. In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2009. p. 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer TL, Pyne JM, Kimbrell TA, et al. Clinician perceptions of virtual reality to assess and treat returning veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61:1153–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotan M, Yalon-Chamovitz S, Weiss PL. Training caregivers to provide virtual reality intervention for adults with severe intellectual and developmental disability. J Phys Ther Educ. 2011;25:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Markus LA, Willems KE, Maruna CC, et al. Virtual reality: feasibility of implementation in a regional burn center. Burns. 2009;35:967–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annema J, Verstraete M, Abeele V, et al. Videogames in therapy: a therapist’s perspective. Fun Games. 2010;94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sci. 2001;32:699–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrow S, Reid D. Stroke survivors' perceptions of a leisure-based virtual reality program. Technol Disabil. 2004;16:69–81.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin J, Levac D. Facilitating clinical decision-making about the use of virtual reality within paediatric motor rehabilitation: describing and classifying virtual reality systems. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14:112–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller S, Reid D. Doing play: competency, control, and expression. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:623–632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sveistrup H, Thornton M, Bryanton C, et al. Outcomes of intervention programs using flatscreen virtual reality. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;7:4856–4858. San Francisco, CA: IEEE.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lizarondo L, Grimmer-Somers K, et al. A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:261–272.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rappolt S, Tassone M. How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002;22:170–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horner MS, Milam Miller S, Rettew DC, et al. Mentoring increases connectedness and knowledge: a cross-sectional evaluation of two programs in child and adolescent psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32:420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh V, Bains D, Vinnicombe S. Informal mentoring as an organisational resource. Long Range Plann. 2002;35:389–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bart O, Agam T, Weiss PL, et al. Using video-capture virtual reality for children with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1579–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1710–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Weiss PL, Katz N. Training multitasking in a virtual supermarket: a novel intervention after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:535–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid D, Hirji T. The influence of a virtual reality leisure intervention program on the motivation of older adult stroke survivors: a pilot study. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2003;21:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton M, Marshall S, McComas J, et al. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Inj. 2005;19:989–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Bartlett DJ, et al. The development of expertise in pediatric rehabilitation therapists: changes in approach, self-knowledge, and use of enabling and customizing strategies. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007;10:223–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:417–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007;149:1–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wensing M, Bosch M, Grol R. Developing and selecting interventions for translating knowledge to action. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:E85–E88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates AW. Technology, open learning and distance education. London: Routledge; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton S. Going the distance: developing shared web-based learning programmes. Occup Ther Int. 2001;8:96–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar