138
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Circling motion and screen edges as an alternative input method for on-screen target manipulation

&
Pages 227-235 | Received 16 Jul 2015, Accepted 20 Oct 2015, Published online: 18 Jan 2016

References

  • Keates S, Hwang F, Langdon P, et al. The use of cursor measures for motion-impaired computer users. Univ Access Inform Soc. 2002;2:18–29.
  • Trewin S, Pain H. Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 1999;50:109–144.
  • Wobbrock JO, Gajos KZ. Goal crossing with mice and trackballs for people with motor impairments: performance, submovements, and design directions. ACM Trans Access Comput (TACCESS). 2008;1:4
  • Trewin S, Keates S, Moffatt K. Developing steady clicks: a method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2006; 2006; Portland, OT, pp. 26–33.
  • McGuffin MJ, Balakrishnan R. Fitts' law and expanding targets: experimental studies and designs for user interfaces. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact (TOCHI). 2005;12:388–422.
  • Grossman T, Balakrishnan R. The bubble cursor: enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05); 2005; Portland, OT, pp. 281–290.
  • Guiard Y, Blanch R, Beaudouin-Lafon M. Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs. Paper presented at: Proceedings of Graphics Interface (GI '04); 2004; Waterloo, OT, pp. 9–16.
  • Ahlström D, Hitz M, Leitner G. An evaluation of sticky and force enhanced targets in multi target situations. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Changing Roles; 2006; Oslo, Norway, pp. 58–67.
  • Accot J, Zhai S. More than dotting the i's – foundations for crossing-based interfaces. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the CHI'2002: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2002; Minneapolis, MN, pp. 73–80.
  • Mizobuchi S, Yasumura M. Tapping vs. circling selections on pen-based devices: evidence for different performance-shaping factors. Paper presented at: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria; 2004.
  • Bates R, Istance H. Zooming interfaces! Enhancing the performance of eye controlled pointing devices. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies; 2002; Atlanta, GA, pp. 119–126.
  • Lankford C. Effective eye-gaze input into windows. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications; 2000; Palm Beach Gardens, FL, pp. 23–27.
  • Accot J, Zhai S. More than dotting the i's – foundations for crossing-based interfaces. Paper presented at: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN; 2002.
  • Walker N, Meyer DE, Smelcer JB. Spatial and temporal characteristics of rapid cursor-positioning movements with electromechanical mice in human–computer interaction. Hum Factors. 1993;35:431–458.
  • Hale K. (2007). Visualizing Fitts' law. [cited 2015 May 30] Available from: http://particletree.com/features/visualizing-fittss-law.
  • Atwood J. (2006). Fitts' law and infinite width. [cited 2015 May 30] Available from: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/fitts-law-and-infinite-width.html.
  • MacKenzie IS. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human–computer interaction. Hum–Comput Interact. 1992;7:91–139.
  • MacKenzie IS, Kauppinen T, Silfverberg M. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. Paper presented at: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA; 2001.
  • Radwin RG, Vanderheiden GC, Lin ML. A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices using Fitts' law. Hum Fact. 1990;32:423–438.
  • MacKenzie IS. Input devices and interaction techniques for advanced computing. In: Virtual environments and advanced interface design. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 437–470.
  • MacKenzie IS, Sellen A, Buxton W. A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. Paper presented at: Proceedings of ACM CHI ‘91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 1991; New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 161–166.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.