Envisioning future cognitive telerehabilitation technologies: a co-design process with clinicians

References

• Harper R, Rodden T, Roger Y, et al. Being human: human-computer interaction in the year 2020. Cambridge, England: Microsoft Research Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Conti M, Das SK, Bisdikian C, et al. Looking ahead in pervasive computing: challenges and opportunities in the era of cyber-physical convergence. Pervasive Mob Comput. 2012;8:2–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, et al. Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardram JE. Pervasive healthcare as a scientific discipline. Methods Inf Med. 2008;47:178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M. Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:195–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill AJ. Report on the potential application of telerehabilitation to adult rehabilitation services in Scotland. Aberdeen: Scottish Centre for Telehealth; 2010. p. 14.
   Google Scholar
• Tator C, Bray G, Morin D, et al. The burden of neurological diseases, and disorders and injuries in Canada; Ottawa: CIHI; 2007. p. 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ragnarson KT, Moses LG, Clarke WR, et al. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;282:974–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen N. Canadian healthcare perspective in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masel BE, DeWitt DS. Traumatic brain injury: a disease process, not an event. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27: 1529–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green REA, Colella B, Maller JJ, et al. Scale and pattern of atrophy in the chronic stages of moderate-severe TBI. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till C, Colella B, Verwegen J, et al. Postrecovery cognitive decline in adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:S25–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar AM, Warden DL, Schwab K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:3075–3081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist T, Gehl C, Mandrekar J, et al. The effect of internet-based cognitive rehabilitation in persons with memory impairments after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2009;23:790–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tost D, Grau S, Ferré M, et al. Previrnec: a cognitive telerehabilitation system based on virtual environments. Proceedings of Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference; Haifa, Israel; 2009:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Cole E. Patient-centered design of cognitive assistive technology for traumatic brain injury telerehabilitation. In: Baecker R, editor. San Rafael (CA): Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2013. p. 128.
   Google Scholar
• Tam S-F, Man WK, Hui-Chan CWY, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of tele-cognitive rehabilitation for functional performance in three case studies. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10:20–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solana J, Cáceres C, Garcia-Molina A, et al. Improving brain injury cognitive rehabilitation by personalized telerehabilitation services: Guttmann Neuropersonal Trainer. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2015;19:124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundine A, Bradbury CL, Dupuis K, et al. Cognitive behavior therapy after acquired brain injury: maintenance of therapeutic benefits at 6 months posttreatment. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012;27:104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen BK, Colella B, Inness E, et al. Recovery of cognitive function after traumatic brain injury: a multilevel modeling analysis of Canadian outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:S3–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg MR, Ruwe WD, Dawson K, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Prof Psychol: Res Pract. 2008;39:169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopp LH, Johnstone BR, Merveille OC. Multidimensional telecare strategies for rural residents with brain injury. J Telemedicine Telecare. 2000;6:S146–S149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man D, Soong W, Tam S, et al. Self-efficacy outcomes of people with brain injury in cognitive skill training using different types of trainer-trainee interaction. Brain Inj. 2006;20:959–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. From designing to co-designing to collective dreaming: three slices in time. Interactions. 2014;21:24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin G. Design meets disability. Cambridge (MA): MIT press; 2009. p. 341.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers Y, Scaife M, Harris E, et al. Things aren’t what they seem to be: innovation through technology inspiration. Proceedings of 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems; London, UK; 2002:373–378.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden J, Rogers Y, Taylor C, et al. Technology inspired design for pervasive healthcare. Proc 5th Int Conf Pervasive Comput Technol Healthc (PervasiveHealth). 2011:609–613.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Westerlund B. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. Proceedings of Nordic Design Research Conference; Helsinki, Finland; 2011:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N. Scaffolds for experiencing in the new design space. Inf Des. 2002:1:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Akama Y, Ivanka T. What community? Facilitating awareness of “community” through playful triggers. Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference; Sydney, Australia; 2010:11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: Int J CoCreation Des Arts. 2008;4:5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ballegaard SA, Hansen TR, Kyng M. Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Florence, Italy; 2008:1807–1816.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd-Graber JL, Nikolova SS, Moffatt KA, et al. Participatory design with proxies: developing a desktop-PDA system to support people with aphasia. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Montreal, Canada; 2006:151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Faria Borges D, Filgueiras LCL, Maciel LV, et al. Customizing a communication device for a child with cerebral palsy using participatory design practices: contributions towards the PD4CAT method. Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Cuiabá, Brazil; 2012:57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ayoade M, Baillie L. A novel knee rehabilitation system for the home. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Toronto, Canada; 2014:2521–2530.
   Google Scholar
• Geurts L, Vanden Abeele V, Husson J, et al. Digital games for physical therapy: fulfilling the need for calibration and adaptation. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction; Funchal, Portugal; 2011:117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Martin DM, Laird R, Hwang F, et al. Computerized short-term memory treatment for older adults with aphasia: feedback from clinicians. Proceedings of the 1th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility; Bellevue, WA, USA; 2013:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Vourvopoulos A, Faria AL, Ponnam K, et al. RehabCity: design and validation of a cognitive assessment and rehabilitation tool through gamified simulations of activities of daily living. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology; Funchal, Portugal; 2014:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Moraiti A, Vanden Abeele V, Vanroye E, et al. Empowering occupational therapists with a DIY-toolkit for smart soft objects. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2015:387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Illich I. Tools for conviviality. New York: Harper & Row; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Convivial toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Allen M, Leung R, McGrenere J, et al. Involving domain experts in assistive technology research. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2008;7:145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Galliers J, Wilson S, Roper A, et al. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference; Roskilde, Denmark; 2012:51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov K, Dalsgård P. Inspiration card workshops. Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interact Systems; University Park, PA, USA; 2006:2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman B, Hendry D. The envisioning cards: a toolkit for catalyzing humanistic and technical imaginations. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Austin, TX, USA; 2012:1145–1148.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero A, Arrasvuori J. PLEX cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Fun and Games; Leuven, Belgium; 2010:28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Holleis P. Integrating usability models into pervasive application development [dissertation]. München: Universität München; 2009. p. 193.
   Google Scholar
• Orwat C, Graefe A, Faulwasser T. Towards pervasive computing in health care – a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton B. Sampling & synthesis: the two sides of experience sketching. Workshop presented at: SIGCHI Conf Hum Factors Comput Systems; 2014 Apr 28; Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki T. Applying probes-from inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign: Int J CoCreation Des Arts. 2005;1:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini C, Rogers Y, Bandara AK, et al. Contravision: exploring users’ reactions to futuristic technology. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2010:153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxe S, Zasler N, Selb M, et al. Development of the international classification of functioning, disability and health core sets for traumatic brain injury: an international consensus process. Brain Inj. 2013;27:379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Binns MA, et al. Managing executive dysfunction following acquired brain injury and stroke using an ecologically valid rehabilitation approach: a study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Taylor WJ. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnould A, Rochat L, Azouvi P, et al. A multidimensional approach to apathy after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013;23:210–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas EJ, Levack WM, Taylor WJ. Self-reflective meaning making in troubled times change in self-identity after traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res. 2014;24: 1033–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon A, Lin J, Stergiou-Kita M. Family members facilitating community re-integration and return to productivity following traumatic brain injury-motivations, roles and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2015:1–9. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1044035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan DM, Barker LM. Human factors in the development and implementation of telerehabilitation systems. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:55–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathan CE, Kinsella A, Rosen MJ, et al. Aspects of human factors engineering in home telemedicine and telerehabilitation systems. Telemed J. 1999;5:169–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu Y, Brown P, Harniss M, et al. Cognitive support technologies for people with TBI: current usage and challenges experienced. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9:279–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman DA. Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York (NY): Basic Books; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, et al. Personal tracking as lived informatics. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Toronto, Canada; 2014:1163–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15:307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines J, Clarke R, Wright P, et al. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factors Comput Systems. 2013:429–438.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton B. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann; 2010.
   Google Scholar