The Purdue Pegboard test: normative data for older adults with low vision

References

• Russell JN, Hendershot GE, LeClere F, et al. Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. Adv Data. 1997;292:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Story MF. Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assist Technol. 1998;10:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtrop JL, Loucks TM, Sosnoff JJ, et al. Investigating Age-related changes in fine motor control across different effectors and the impact of white matter integrity. Neuroimage. 2014;96:81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffin J, Asher EJ. The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:234–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:477–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K, et al. The effectiveness of low-vision rehabilitation on participation in daily living and quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1476–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbury O, Wittich W. Barriers to low vision rehabilitation: the Montreal Barriers Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2011;52:8933–8938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, McGwin G, Lee PP, et al. Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:681–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horowitz A, Brennan M, Reinhardt JP, et al. The impact of assistive device use on disability and depression among older adults with age-related vision impairments. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61:S274–S280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Burgh D. Issuing assistive devices to older patients in rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49:994–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C-S. Relationship between visuo-perceptual function and manual dexterity in community-dwelling older adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:1871–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden JL, McNulty PA. The magnitude and rate of reduction in strength, dexterity and sensation in the human hand vary with ageing. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48:756–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa LD, Vaughan HG, Levita E, et al. Purdue Pegboard as a predictor of the presence and laterality of cerebral lesions. J Consult Psychol. 1963;27:133–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mateos-Toset S, Cabrera-Martos I, Torres-Sánchez I, et al. Effects of a single hand–exercise session on manual dexterity and strength in persons with Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. PM & R. 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanchard JJ, Neale JM. The neuropsychological signature of schizophrenia: generalized or differential deficit? Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Wu Y, Chen I, et al. Dual-task performance involving hand dexterity and cognitive tasks and daily functioning in people with schizophrenia: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;69:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew J, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas C, et al. Purdue pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older. Dev Neuropsychol. 1988;4:29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, et al. The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxfield KE, Perry JD. Performance of blind vocational rehabilitation clients on the purdue pegboard. Percept Mot Skills. 1960;11:139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Buddenberg LA, Davis C. Test-retest reliability of the purdue pegboard test. Am J Occup Ther. 2000;54:555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacko J, Scott IU, Sainfort F, et al. Older adults and visual impairment: what do exposure times and accuracy tell us about performance gains associated with multimodal feedback? CHI ‘03 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 2003. p.33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jacko J, Barnard L, Kongnakom T, et al. Isolating the effects of visual impairment. CHI ‘04 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press; 2004. p. 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard VK, Jacko JA, Pizzimenti JJ. An exploratory investigation of handheld computer interaction for older adults with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York: ACM Press; 2005. p. 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wittich W, Southall K, Johnson A. Usability of assistive listening devices by older adults with low vision. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015. DOI:10.3109/17483107.2015.1042076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi A. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2225–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeudall L, Fromm D. Normative data stratified by age and sex for 12 neuropsychological tests. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42:918–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin MJ, Greenhalgh R. Normative data for assessing the manual dexterity of visually handicapped adults in vocational rehabilitation. J Occup Psychol. 1987;60:73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emery VK, Edwards PJ, Jacko JA, et al. Toward achieving universal usability for older adults through multimodal feedback. ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped. New York: ACM Press; 2002. p.46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney KP, Jacko JA, Vidakovic B, et al. Leveraging data complexity: pupillary behavior of older adults with visual impairment during HCI. ACM Trans Comput Interact. 2006;13:376–402.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake GT, Omoscharka E, Quaney BM, et al. Effect of bilateral macular scotomas from age-related macular degeneration on reach-to-grasp hand movement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2540–2550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, O’Leary N, Melmoth D, et al. The functional consequences of glaucoma for eye-hand coordination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar