Improving a web-based employability intervention for work-disabled employees: results of a pilot economic evaluation

References

• Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU).Risk factors for sick leave – general studies. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004;63:49–108 (Chapter 5).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waddell G. The back pain revolution. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:233–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick BC, Habeck RV, Ossmann J, et al. Predictors of successful work role functioning after carpal tunnel release surgery. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:490–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein P. The mediation of disability by self-efficacy in different samples of chronic pain patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:794–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, Huang YH. Concerns and expectations about returning to work with low back pain: identifying themes from focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1269–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefsmit N, de Rijk A, Houkes I. Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker D, Zijlstra-Vlasveld MC, Brouwers EP, et al. Return-to-work self-efficacy and actual return to work among long-term sick-listed employees. J Occup Rehabil. 2014:25:423–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samoocha D, Bruinvels DJ, Elbers NA, et al. Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samoocha D, Snels IA, Bruinvels DJ, et al. Process evaluation of a web-based intervention aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samoocha D, Snels IA, Bruinvels DJ, et al. Effectiveness of an interactive website aimed at empowerment of disability benefit claimants: results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:410–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood K, Marshall S, Fitzpatrick R. Patient participation in the consultation process: a structured review of intervention strategies. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:12–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnersley P, Edwards A, Hood K, et al. Interventions before consultations to help patients address their information needs by encouraging question asking: systematic review. BMJ. 2008;337:a485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genabeek J, Noben C, Rooijackers B, et al. Does knowledge offers the solution? Research report of an investigation into the usage of a web-based employability intervention among members of a trade union [in Dutch: Biedt inzicht uitzicht? Verslag van een onderzoek naar het gebruik van de interventie ‘Wijzer met Welder’ door een groep leden van CNV Publieke Zaak.] Report. Hoofddorp: TNO, 2014 R10770 TNO 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Genabeek J, Fermin BMF, Huijs JJJM, et al. Employability among the unemployed. Report of a study towards the effectiveness of a web-based employability intervention among unemployed workers. [in Dutch: Wijzer voor vangnetters. Verslag van een onderzoek naar de inzet van de interventie 'Wijzer met Welder' bij vangnetters]. Report. Hoofddorp: TNO, 2014 27 January 2014. Report No.: TNO 2014 R10155.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond M, Coyle D. The role of pilot studies in the economic evaluation of health technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998;14:405–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomi KIJ, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, et al. Work ability index. 2nd edn. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group E. EQ-5D user guide. Rotterdam Erasmus Univeristeit Rotterdam, Centrum Voor Gezondheidsbeleid En Recht; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PF, et al. The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ. 2006;15:1121–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroQol. [cited 2014]. Available from: http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d/valuation-of-eq-5d/eq-5d-5l-value-sets.html.
   Google Scholar
• Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenbrink JB, Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF. Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:443–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healthcare institute Netherlands. Pharmacotherapeutic compass [in Dutch: College van Zorgverzekeringen. Farmacotheurapeutisch kompas] [cited 2012 Sep]; Available from: http://www.fk.cvz.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Drug costs in the Netherlands [cited 2014]. Available from: http://www.medicijnkosten.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkaart L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Manual for cost research. Methods and standards costs for economic evaluations in healthcare [in Dutch: Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg]. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Instituut voor Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Noben C, Smit F, Nieuwenhuijsen K, et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness of two interventions to promote work functioning by targeting mental health complaints among nurses: pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51:1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K. Past, present and future of work ability. People and Work Research Reports. Finnish Institute Occup Health Helsinki. 2004;65:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Radkiewich P, Widerszal-Bazyl M. Psychometric properties of work ability index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congress Series 2005;1280:304–309.
   Google Scholar
• de Zwart B, Frings-Dresen M. Test–retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occup Med (Lond). 2002;52:177–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar