Self-management and supervisory feedback improves trainer implementation of communication rehabilitation programmes

References

• Schlosser RW, Sigafoos J, Rothschild N, Burke M, Palace LM. Speech and language disorders. A comprehensive guide to intellectual and developmental disabilities, I Brown, P Maire. Brooks, Balitmore, MD 2009; 383–402
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Arthur-Kelly M, Butterfield N, Enhancing everyday communication for children with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1985; 18: 111–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlop-Christy M, Carpenter M. Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions 2000; 2: 98–112
   Google Scholar
• Harding J, Wacker DP, Berg WK, Barretto A, Ringdahl J. Evaluation of relations between specific antecedent stimuli and self-injury during functional analysis conditions. American Journal on Mental Retardation 2005; 110: 205–215
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koegel RL, O’Dell MC, Dunlap G. Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1988; 18: 525–538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin-Ding L, Chia-Fengyen Y, Ching-Hui L, Chi-wei L, Jia-Ling W. Rehabilitation service utilization and determinants among people with an intellectual disability: Preliminary findings in Taiwan. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 1499–1506
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang R, Machalicek W, Rispoli MJ, Regester A. Training parents to implement communication interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of training procedures. Evidenced Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 2009; 3: 174–190
   Google Scholar
• Cooper KJ, Browder DM. Preparing staff to enhance active participation of adults with severe disabilities by offering choice and prompting performance during a community purchasing activity. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2001; 22: 1–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissel RC, Whitman TL, Reid DH. An institutional staff training and self-management program for developing multiple self-care skills in severely/profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1983; 16: 395–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman GS, Riordan MR, Reiss ML, Pyles DAM, Bailey JS. The effects of self-monitoring and supervisor feedback on staff performance in a residential setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1988; 21: 401–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgio LD, Whitman TL, Reid DH. A participative management approach for improving direct-care staff performance in an institutional setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1983; 16: 37–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duker P, Didden R, Sigafoos J. One-to-one training: Instructional procedures for learners with developmental disabilities. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 2004
   Google Scholar
• Suda KT, Miltenberger RG. Evaluation of staff management strategies to increase positive interactions in a vocational setting. Behavioral Residential Treatment 1983; 8: 69–88
   Google Scholar
• Demchak M. A review of behavioral staff training in special education settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 1987; 22: 205–217
   Google Scholar
• van Vonderen A. Effectiveness of direct verbal feedback on trainer behaviour during communication training with individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2002; 48: 245–251
   Google Scholar
• Miltenberger RG. Behavior modification: Principles and procedures. Brooks/Cole, , CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Burg MM, Reid DH, Lattimore J. Use of self-recording and supervision program to change institutional staff behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1979; 12: 363–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JR, Russell RH. Behavioral staff management: An analogue study of acceptability and its behavioral correlates. Behavioral Residential Treatment 1990; 5: 259–270
   Google Scholar
• Lang R, Page S, Benefits of teacher collaboration across varying stages of the research process. Intervention in School and Clinic (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Miltenberger RG, Larson J, Doerner M, Orvedal L. Assessing the acceptability of staff management procedures to direct care and supervisory staff. Behavioral Residential Treatment 1992; 7: 23–24
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. American Guidance Service, , MN 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bondy AS, Frost LA. The Picture Exchange Communication System. Behavior Modification 2001; 25: 725–744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 18: 37–46
   Google Scholar
• Suen H, Ary D. Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale 1989
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie J. Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993; 6: 966–974
   Google Scholar
• Arco L. Feedback for improving staff training and performance in behavioral treatment programs. Behavioral Interventions 2008; 23: 39–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderen A, van Swart C, de Didden R. Effectiveness of instruction and video feedback on staff's use of prompts and children's adaptive responses during one-to-one training in children with severe to profound intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010; 31: 829–838
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Reilly MF, Renzaglia A, Lee S. An analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of systematic instruction competencies by preservice teachers using behavioral supervision techniques. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities 1994; 29: 22–33
   Google Scholar