The role of assisted manipulation in cognitive development

References

• Vauclair J. Phylogenetic approach to object manipulation in human and ape infants. Human Development 1984; 27: 321–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty M, Clifton R, Chollard R. The begginings of tool use by infants and toddlers. Infancy 2001; 2: 233–256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J, Bowman M, Johansson R. Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Current opinion in Neurobiology 2006; 16: 650–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessell A, Thompson H. Infant behavior: Its genesis and growth. McGraw- Hill, New York 1934
   Google Scholar
• Piaget J. The construction of reality in the child. Routledge, Great Britain 1954
   Google Scholar
• Gibson E. Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting and acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology 1988; 39: 1–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thele E. Motor development as foundation and future of developmental psychology. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2000; 24: 385–397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner J, Koslowski B. Visually preadapted constituents of manipulatory action. Perception 1972; 1: 3–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Affolter F. From action to interaction as primary root for development. Movement and action in learning and development: Clinical implications for pervasive developmental disorders, I Stockman. Elsevier, San Diego, CA 2004; 169–199
   Google Scholar
• Haywood K, Getchell N. Life span motor development, 5th. Human Kinetics, Illinois 2009
   Google Scholar
• Keen R. The development of problem solving in young children: A critical cognitive skill. Annual Review of Psychology 2011; 62: 1–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttelman D, Carpenter M, Call J, Tomasello M. Rational tool use and tool choice in human infants and great apes. Child Development 2008; 79: 609–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger S, Adolph K, Lobo S. Out of the toolbox: Toddlers differentiate wobbly and wooden handrails. Child Development 2005; 76: 1294–1307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker S, Gibson K. Object manipulation, tool use and sensoriomotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. Journal of Human Evolution 1977; 6: 623–641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg R. Handbook of intelligence. University of Cambridge, Cambridge 2000
   Google Scholar
• Haith MM, Benson JB, Roberts RJ, Pennington BF. The development of future oriented processes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 1994
   Google Scholar
• Lockman J. A perception– Action perspective on tool use development. Child Development 2000; 71: 137–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J, Johansson R. Hand movements. Encyclopedia of the human brain, V Ramachandran. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 2002; 2: 399–414
   Google Scholar
• Nowak D, Hermsdorfer J. Objective evaluation of manual performance deficits in neurological movement disorders. Brain Research Reviews 2006; 51: 108–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright M, Hunt L, Stanley O. Quantification of object manipulation in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Rehabilitation 2001; 4: 187–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruff H, McCarton C, Kurtzberg D. Preterm infants' manipulative exploration of objects. Child Development 1984; 55: 1166–1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick H. Eleanor Gibson: Learning to perceive and perceiving to learn. Developmental Psychology 1992; 28: 787–794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson E. Principles of perceptual learning and development. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Gibson J, Gibson E. Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment?. Psychological Review 1955; 62: 32–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Manipulating Industrial Robots [Internet]. 1994, ISO 8373. Accessed August, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Encarnação P, Adams K. Robots: Assistive technologies for play learning and cognitive development. Technology and Disability 2010; 22: 127–146
   Google Scholar
• Poletz L, Encarnação P, Adams K, Cook A. Robot skills and cognitive performance of preschool children. Technology and Disability 2010; 22: 117–126
   Google Scholar
• Vingerhoets G, Vandamme K, Vercammen A. Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain and Cognition 2009; 63: 481–489
   Google Scholar
• Forman G. Observations of young children solving problems with computers and robots. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 1986; 1: 60–73
   Google Scholar
• Louw D, Van Ede D, Louw A. Human development, 2nd. Kagiso Tertiary, Cape Town 2005
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan T, Verplank W. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. technical report. Massachusetts Institut of Technology Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, Cambridge, MA 1978; ADA057655
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Hoseit K, Liu R, Lee Y, Zenteno- Sanchez C. Arm system to facilitate learning in very young disabled children. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1988; 35: 132–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanger C, Cook A. Using robotics to assist in determining cognitive age of very young children. In: Society IEiMaB, editor. Proceedings of the 12 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Philadelphia, PA; 1990. p 1911–1912.
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Adams K, Volden J, Harbottle N, Harbottle C. Using Lego robots to estimate cognitive ability in children who have severe physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2011; 6: 338–346
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook A, Liu K, Hoseit P. Robotic arm use by very young children. Assistive Technology 1990; 2: 51–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook A, Bentz B, Harbottle N, Lynch C, Miller B. School based use of a robotic arm system by children with disabilities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2005; 13: 452–460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk T, Smith A, Cardillo J, editors. Goal attainment scaling: Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Adams K, Yantha J, Cook A. Lego robot control via a speech generating communication device for operational and communicative goals. In: Communication ISfAaA, editor. Montreal: 13th Biennial ISAAC Conference; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Adams K, Yantha J, Cook A. Lego robot control via a speech generating communication device for play and educational activities. In: RESNA, editor. Washington D.C.: RESNA Annual Conference; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Knox S. Developmental and current use of the revised knox preschool play scale. Play in occupational therapy for children, D Parham, L Fazio. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO 2008; 55–70
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Adams K. The importance of play: AT for children with disabilities. Design and use of assistive technology: Social, technical, ethical and economic challenges, 1st, M Oishi, I Mitchell, F Van der Loos. Springer, New York 2010; 33–40
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan M, Adams K, Cook A. Development of an interface for integration of communication and robotic play. RESNA Annual Conference, Pheonix, AZ 2007
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Polgar J. Cook and Hussey's assistive technologies, principles and practice, 3rd. Elsevier Inc, Philadelphia, PA 2008
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy J, Light J, Drager K, McNaughton D, Grodzicki L, Jones J, Panek E, Parkin E. Re-designing scanning to reduce learning demands: The performance of typically developing 2-year-olds. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 269–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, Drager K. Improving the design of augmentative and alternative technologies for young children. Assistive Technology 2002; 14: 17–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams K, Cook A. Development and use of an integrated augmentative communication and robotic play system for children with and without disabilities. In preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Kwee H, Quaedackers J, Van de Bool E, Theeuwen L, Speth L. POCUS Project: Adapting the control of the MANUS manipulator for persons with cerebral palsy: An exploratory study. Technology and Disability 2002; 14: 31–42
   Google Scholar
• Adams K. Involving users in the design of a speech generating interface for Lego robot control. In: RESNA, editor. Toronto, ON: Annual RESNA Conference; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mindess K, Cook A, Adams K. Changes in the communicative intent of vocalizations recorded during robot use. Canadian Association of Speech Pathologists and Audiologists Annual Conference; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes K. Training young children for powered mobility. Developmental Disabilities SIS Newsletter AOTA 1991; 14: 1–2
   Google Scholar
• Butler C, Okamoto G, McKay T. Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1984; 65: 95–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge S. Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities: Current status and future directions. Journal of Special Education Technology 2001; 16: 29–40
   Google Scholar
• Brodin J, Lindstran P. Are computers the solution to support development in children in need of special support?. Technology and Disability 2004; 16: 137–145
   Google Scholar
• Howard J, Greyrose E, Kehr K, Espinosa M, Beckwith L. Teacher- facilitated microcomputer activities: Enhancing social play and affect in young children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology 1996; 13: 36–47
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock C, Noonan M. Computer- assisted instruction of early academic skills. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 2000; 20: 145–158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Encarnação P, Piedade G, Cook A, Adams K, Gil I, Maya C, Azevedo L, Londral A, Rodrigues S. Virtual robot and virtual environments for cognitive skills assesment. AAATE Conference: Everyday technology for independence and care, G Gelderblom, T Soede, B Diederen, L Adriaens, L De Witte. Maastricht, the Netherlands 2011; 508–516
   Google Scholar
• Encarnação P, Piedade G, Adams K, Cook A. Virtual assistive robot for play. To be submitted to the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Assistive Technologies. Innsbruck, Austria 2012
   Google Scholar
• Adams K, Cook A. Using an augmentative and alternative communication device to program and control Lego robots. RESNA Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA 2009
   Google Scholar
• Adams K. Access to math activities for children with disabilities by controlling Lego robots via augmentative communication devices. PhD Dissertation. University of Alberta; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Howell R, Hay K. Software- based access and control of robotic manipulators for severe physically disabled students. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 1989; 1: 53–72
   Google Scholar
• Topping M, Smith K. The development of Handy I. A robotic system to assist the severely disabled. Technology and Disability 1999; 10: 95–105
   Google Scholar
• Michaud F, Salter T, Duquette A, Laplante J. Perspectives on mobile robots used as tools for pediatric rehabilitation. Assistive Technologies Special Issue on Intelligent Systems in Pediatric Rehabilitation 2007; 19: 21–36
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K. Developing scenarios for robot assisted play. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, TU Munchen. Germany, Munich 2008
   Google Scholar
• Bumby K, Dautenhahn K. Investigating children's attitudes towards robots: A case study. Proceedings of CT'99: Third Cognitive Technology Conference: San Francisco, CA; 1999.
   Google Scholar