Technology-based programs to support forms of leisure engagement and communication for persons with multiple disabilities: Two single-case studies

References

• Chantry J, Dunford C. How do computer assistive technologies enhance participation in childhood occupations for children with multiple and complex disabilities? A review of the current literature. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2010; 73: 351–365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd DCH, Zabriskie RB, Widmer MA, Eggett D. Contributions of family leisure to family functioning among families that include children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Leisure Research 2009; 41: 261–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding C, Lindsay G, O’Brien A, Dipper L, Wright J. Implementing AAC with children with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A study in rationale underpinning intervention. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs 2011; 11: 120–129
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Didden R, Oliva D, Campodonico F, De Pace C, Chiapparino C, Groeneweg J. Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: New research evaluation and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009; 30: 1084–1094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Oliva D, Signorino M, et al. Microswitch- and VOCA-assisted programs for two post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009; 30: 1459–1467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Bosco A, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. An overview of intervention options for promoting adaptive behavior of persons with acquired brain injury and minimally conscious state. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010; 31: 1121–1134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli MJ, Franco JH, Van der Meer L, Lang R, Camargo SPH. The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2010; 13: 276–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Green VA, Payne D, Son S-H, O’Reilly M, Lancioni GE. A comparison of picture exchange and speech generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2009; 25: 99–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Ricci I, Addante LM, Trubia G. A woman with multiple disabilities uses a VOCA system to request for and access caregiver-mediated stimulus events. Life Span and Disability 2011; 14: 91–99
   Google Scholar
• Durando J. A survey on literacy instruction for students with multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2008; 102: 40–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup GM, Cornell E, Bundy AC. The treasure in leisure activities: Fostering resilience in young people who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2010; 104: 419–430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly SM. The use of assistive technology by high school students with visual impairments: A second look at the current problem. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2011; 105: 235–239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache J, Derwent G. Access to computer-based leisure for individuals with profound disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23: 343–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichten CS, Asuncion JV, Barile M, Ferraro V, Wolforth J. Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2009; 103: 543–557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Oliva D. Enabling two women with blindness and additional disabilities to make phone calls independently via a computer-aided telephone system. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2011; 14: 283–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Green VA, Oliva D, Buonocunto F, Colonna F, Navarro J. Special text messaging communication systems for persons with multiple disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 2012; 15: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle J. Evaluating assistive technology in the education of persons with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education 2011; 20: 77–85
   Google Scholar
• Stevens-Ratchford R, Krause A. Visually impaired older adults and home-based leisure activities: The effects of person-environment congruence. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 2004; 98: 14–27
   Google Scholar
• Holburn S, Nguyen D, Vietze PM. Computer-assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities. Behavioral Interventions 2004; 19: 25–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Bellini D, Oliva D, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. Camera-based microswitch technology for eyelid and mouth responses of persons with profound multiple disabilities: Two case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2010; 31: 1509–1514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Tota A, Smaldone A, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Montironi G. Extending the evaluation of novel microswitch technology for small responses in children with profound multiple disabilities. Assistive Technology 2007; 19: 11–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung B, Chau T. A multiple camera tongue switch for a child with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2010; 5: 58–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mechling LC. Comparison of the effects of three approaches on the frequency of stimulus activation, via a single switch, by students with profound intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education 2006; 40: 94–102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Alberti G, Lang R. Two adults with multiple disabilities use a computer-aided telephone system to make phone calls independently. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32: 2330–2335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Signorino M, Oliva D, Alberti G, Carrella L, De Tommaso M. A special messaging technology for two persons with acquired brain injury and multiple disabilities. Brain Injury 2010; 24: 1236–1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, De Pace C, Chiapparino C, Ricci I, Navarro J, Addante LM, Spica A. Technology-assisted programmes to promote leisure engagement in persons with acquired brain injury and profound multiple disabilities: Two case studies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2011; 6: 412–419
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Oliva D, Smaldone A, La Martire M, Navarro J, Spica A, Chirico M. Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2011; 6: 108–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Alberti G, Oliva D, Megna G, Iliceto C, Damiani S, Ricci I, et al. Post-coma persons with extensive multiple disabilities use microswitch technology to access selected stimulus events or operate a radio device. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32: 1638–1645
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J, Colonna F, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Megna M, Oliva D. Post-coma persons emerged from a minimally conscious state and showing multiple disabilities learn to manage a radio-listening activity. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2012; 33: 670–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O’Reilly MF, Singh NN, Sigafoos J, Buonocunto F, Sacco V, Colonna F, Navarro J, Lanzilotti C, De Pace C, et al. Communication opportunities via special messaging technology for two post-coma persons with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2011; 32: 1703–1708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change3rd. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2009
   Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: A qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2008; 40: 89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin S, Biklen D, Kasa-Hendrickson C, Kluth P, Cardinal DN, Broderick A. Independence, participation, and the meaning of intellectual ability. Disability and Society 2001; 16: 415–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O’Reilly MF, Sigafoos J. Assistive technology for behavioral interventions for persons with severe/profound multiple disabilities: A selective overview. European Journal of Behavior Analysis 2011; 12: 7–26
   Google Scholar
• Carter EW, Owens L, Trainor AA, Sun Y, Swedeen B. Self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2009; 114: 179–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman B, Wamsley B, Liebel DV, Saad ZB, Eggert GM. Patient satisfaction, empowerment, and health and disability status effects of a disease management-health promotion nurse intervention among Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities. The Gerontologist 2009; 49: 778–792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nota L, Soresi S, Ferrari L, Wehmeyer ML. A multivariate analysis of the self-determination of adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies 2011; 12: 245–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey K. Review of research on self-management interventions in supported employment settings for employees with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 2007; 30: 27–34
   Google Scholar
• Brown RI, Schalock RL, Brown I. Quality of life: Its application to persons with intellectual disabilities and their families – introduction and overview. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 2009; 6: 2–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CM, Carr JE. Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness individuals with developmental disabilities: A review. Behavioral Interventions 2007; 22: 229–244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson G, Kottorp A, Borg J, Tham K. Relationship between occupational gaps in everyday life, depressive mood and life satisfaction after acquired brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2009; 41: 187–194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The meaning of feeling well in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2009; 18: 2273–2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall J, Evans J, Baldwin P. The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education 2010; 31: 252–260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra HP, Vlaskamp C. Leisure provision for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: Quality time or killing time?. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2005; 49: 434–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Braithwaite H, Gustafsson L, Griffin J, Collier AM, Fletcher S. Participation in leisure activities during brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2011; 25: 806–818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagohara DM. Three students with developmental disabilities learn to operate an iPod to access age-appropriate entertainment videos. Journal of Behavioral Education 2011; 20: 33–43
   Google Scholar
• Smith RB, Morgan M, Davidson J. Does the daily choice making of adults with intellectual disability meet the normalization principle?. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2005; 30: 226–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams D, Oliver C. The expression and assessment of emotions and internal states in individuals with severe or profound intellectual disabilities. Clinical Psychology Review 2011; 31: 293–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias MJ. The connection between social-emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly 2004; 27: 53–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure KS, Halpern J, Wolper PA, Donahue JJ. Emotion regulation and intellectual disability. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 2009; 15: 38–44
   Google Scholar
• Sams K, Collins S, Reynolds S. Cognitive therapy abilities in people with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2006; 19: 25–33
   Google Scholar
• Baker PM, Moon NW. Wireless technologies and accessibility for people with disabilities: Findings from a policy research instrument. Assistive Technology 2008; 20: 149–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard Winkler SL, Vogel B, Hoenig H, Cowper Ripley DC, Wu S, Fitzgerald SG, Mann WC, Reker DM. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by Medicare and VA. Medical Care 2010; 48: 558–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israena P, Dubsok P, Pan-Ngum S. A study of low-cost, robust Assistive Listening System (ALS) based on digital wireless technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008; 3: 295–301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg J, Larson S, Ostegren PO. The right to assistive technology: For whom, for what, and by whom?. Disability and Society 2011; 26: 151–167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan K, Henson R, Cowan AK. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2008; 38: 678–692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren M, Nygård L, Kottorp A. Technology and everyday functioning in people with intellectual disabilities: A Rasch analysis of the Everyday technology Use Questionnaire (ETUQ). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2011; 55: 610–620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Behavior modification in applied settings6th. Wadsworth, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy C. Single case designs for educational research. Allyn & Bacon, New York 2005
   Google Scholar
• Peterson JJ, Andrew Peterson N, Lowe JB, Nothwehr FK. Promoting leisure physical activity participation among adults with intellectual disabilities: Validation of the self-efficacy and social support scales. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2009; 22: 487–497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar