An ecological method for the sampling of nonverbal signalling behaviours of young children with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD)

References

• Mencap [Internet]. Communicating with people with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD). Available from: http://www.mencap.org.uk/guides [last accessed 11 Aug 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Neisser U. Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. Developmental research, public policy, and the ecology of childhood. Child Development 1974;45:1–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner JS. From communication to language – A psychological perspective. Cognition 1974;3:255–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner JS. The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language 1975;2:1–19
   Google Scholar
• Cirrin FM, Rowland CM. Communicative assessment of nonverbal youths with severe/profound mental retardation. Mental Retardation 1985;23:52–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lobato D, Barrera RD, Feldman RS. Sensorimotor functioning and prelinguistic communication of severely and profoundly retarded individuals. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 1981;85:489–496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogletree BT, Wetherby AM, Westling DL. Profile of the prelinguistic intentional communicative behaviors of children with profound mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1992;97:186–196
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snyder-McLean L, McLean JE, Etter R. Clinical assessment of sensorimotor knowledge in nonverbal, severely retarded clients. Topics in Language Disorders 1988;8:1–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasgow E, Halle JW. Teaching social communication to young children with severe disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 1995;15:164–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J. Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999;15:183–190
   Google Scholar
• Wetherby AM, Prizant BM. The expression of communicative intent: Assessment guidelines. Seminars in Speech and Language 1989;10:77–91
   Google Scholar
• Male DB, Rayner M. Who goes to SLD schools? Aspects of policy and provision for pupils with profound and multiple learning difficulties who attend special schools in England. Support for Learning 2007;22:145–152
   Google Scholar
• Atkin K, Lorch MP. Intentionality as ‘aboutness': A means of interpreting the nonverbal repertoire of children with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD). Mind and Language 2014; submitted
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Carter M, Hook J. Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1998;14:102–114
   Google Scholar
• Atkin K, Lorch MP. Investigating the nonsymbolic signalling behaviour of young children with profound and multiple learning disabilities (PMLD). 2014; forthcoming
   Google Scholar
• Evans P, Ware J. ‘Special care’ provision: The education of children with profound and multiple learning difficulties. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Lacey P. Meeting complex needs through collaborative multidisciplinary teamwork. In: Lacey P, Ouvry C, editors. People with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A collaborative approach to meeting complex needs. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd; 1998. pp ix–xvii
   Google Scholar
• Ware J. Profound and multiple learning difficulties. In: Lewis A, Norwich B, editors. Special teaching for special children? Pedagogies for inclusion. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005. pp 67–80
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright C, Wind-Cowie S. Profound and multiple learning difficulties. London: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2005
   Google Scholar
• PMLD network/Mencap [Internet]. About profound and multiple learning disabilities. Mencap; 2009. Available from: http://www.pmldnetwork.org/PMLD%20Definition%20factsheet%20-%20standard.pdf [last accessed 11 Aug 2010]
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 1992. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf [last accessed 6 Aug 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Downing J. Nonsymbolic communication development: Theoretical concepts and educational strategies. In: Goetz L, Guess D, Stremel-Campbell K, editors. Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co; 1987. pp 15–48
   Google Scholar
• Hewett D, Nind M. Interaction in action: Reflections on the use of intensive interaction. London: David Fulton; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Nind M, Hewett D. Interaction as curriculum. British Journal of Special Education 1988;15:55–57
   Google Scholar
• Nind M, Hewett D. Access to communication: Developing the basics of communication with people with severe learning difficulties through intensive interaction, 2nd ed. London: David Fulton; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ware J. Creating a responsive environment for people with profound and multiple learning difficulties, 2nd ed. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Ernst B, Guess D. Nonsymbolic communication in early interactional processes and implications for intervention. In: Bullis M, Fielding G, editors. Communication development in young children with deaf-blindness: Literature review. Monmouth, OR: Deaf-Blind Communication Skills Centre; 1988. pp 69–122
   Google Scholar
• Stillman R, Siegel-Causey E. Introduction to nonsymbolic communication. In: Siegel-Causey E, Guess D, editors. Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 1989. pp 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Bashinski SM. Enhancing initial communication and responsiveness of learners with multiple disabilities: A Tri-Focus Framework for partners. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 1997;12:105–120
   Google Scholar
• Spitz RA. The first year of life: A psychoanalytic study of normal and deviant development of object relations. New York: International Universities Press, Inc; 1965
   Google Scholar
• Werner H, Kaplan B. Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to the psychology of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1984 (Original work published 1963)
   Google Scholar
• Coupe O’Kane J, Goldbart J. Communication before speech: Development and assessment. 2nd ed. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Olsson C. Dyadic interaction with a child with multiple disabilities: A system theory perspective on communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004;2:228–242
   Google Scholar
• Bruce S, Vargas C. Intentional communication acts expressed by children with severe disabilities in high-rate contexts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007;23:300–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Ernst B. Theoretical orientation and research in nonsymbolic development. In: Siegel-Causey E, Guess D, editors. Enhancing nonsymbolic communication interactions among learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 1989. pp 15–51
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Causey E, Guess D. Enhancing interactions between service providers and individuals who are severely multiply disabled: Strategies for developing nonsymbolic communication. Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Arthur M. Patterns amongst behavior states, sociocommunicative, and activity variables in educational programs for students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2004;16:125–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur-Kelly M, Bochner S, Center Y, Mok M. Socio-communicative perspectives on research and evidence-based practice in the education of students with profound and multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 2007;19:161–176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur-Kelly M, Foreman P, Bennett D, Pascoe S. Interaction, inclusion and students with profound and multiple disabilities: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2008;8:161–166
   Google Scholar
• Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S, Smyth-King B. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2004;29:183–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess D, Roberts S, Guy B. Implications of behavior state for the assessment and education of students with profound disabilities. In: Repp AC, Horner RH, editors. Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1999. pp 338–394
   Google Scholar
• Guess D, Roberts S, Rues J. Longitudinal analysis of state patterns and related variables among infants and children with significant disabilities. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002;27:112–124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munde V, Vlaskamp C, Ruijssenaars AJJM, Nakken H. Alertness in individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2009;30:462–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards SB, Richards RY. Implications for assessing biobehavioral states in individuals with profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 1997;12:79–86
   Google Scholar
• Richards SB, Taylor RL. A review of biobehavioral state assessment of individuals with profound disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention 2005;30:5–13
   Google Scholar
• Carter M, Iacono T. Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2002;18:177–191
   Google Scholar
• Duranti A. Truth and intentionality: An ethnographic critique. Cultural Anthropology 1993;8:214–245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranti A. Intentionality. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2000;9:134–136
   Google Scholar
• Duranti A. The social ontology of intentions. Discourse Studies 2006;8:31–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner H. Comparative psychology of mental development, 3rd ed. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.; 1980 (Original work published 1940)
   Google Scholar
• Schilder P. Mind: Perception and thought in their constructive aspects. New York: Columbia University Press; 1942
   Google Scholar
• Schilder P. Contributions to developmental neuropsychiatry. London: Tavistock Publications; 1964
   Google Scholar
• Condon WS, Ogston WD. A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1967;5:221–235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R. Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In: Feldman RS, Rimé B, editors. Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. pp 401–432
   Google Scholar
• Ekman P, Friesen WV. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1969;1:49–98
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan JA. Proxemics, kinesics, and gaze. In: Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R, Scherer KR, editors. The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp 137–198
   Google Scholar
• Kendon A. Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica 1970;32:100–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon WS, Sander LW. Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech. Child Development 1974;45:456–462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman R. Parent-infant synchrony: Biological foundations and developmental outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007;16:340–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2007;48:329–354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M, Bochner S, Butterfield N. Enhancing peer interactions within the context of play. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 1999;46:367–381
   Google Scholar
• Kobe FH, Mulick JA, Rash TA, Martin J. Nonambulatory persons with profound mental retardation: Physical, developmental, and behavioral characteristics. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1994;15:413–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston T, de Beuzeville L. Researching the linguistic use of space in Auslan: Guidelines for annotators using the Auslan Corpus. Sydney: Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University; 2009. Available from: http://media.auslan.org.au/media/upload/attachments/AnnotationGuidelinesForSpaceProject.pdf [last accessed 25 Aug 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Bickford A. Using ELAN: A getting-started guide for use with sign languages. 2005. Available from: http://www.und.edu/dept/linguistics/textbooks/UsingElan.pdf [last accessed 9 Jun 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Biel A. Trail guide to the body: A hands-on guide to locating muscles, bones and more, 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Books of Discovery; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Harper RA. Basic ophthalmology. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Clark J, Yallop C. An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995
   Google Scholar