The importance of interaction in the implementation of information technology in health care: A symbolic interactionism study on the meaning of accessibility

References

• Bowker GC, Leigh Star S. Sorting things out – classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nirel N, Rosen B, Sharon A, Samuel H, Cohen AD. The impact of an integrated hospital-community medical information system on quality of care and medical service utilisation in primary-care clinics. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2011;36(2):63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLane S, Turley JP. Informaticians: how they may benefit your healthcare organization. Journal of Nursing Administration 2011;41(1):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, National Board of Health and Welfare. Stockholm: National Strategy for e-Health; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Balka E, Bjorn P, Wagner I. Steps toward a typology for health informatics. San Diego, CA: CSCW; 8–12 November 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas WI, Thomas DS. The child in America: behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf; 1928.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton S, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144(10):742–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Aldrich K. Overcoming barriers to electronic medical record (EMR) implementation in the US healthcare system: a comparative study. Health Informatics Journal 2010;16:306–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• While A, Dewsbury G. Nursing and information and communication technology (ICT): a discussion of trends and future directions. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2011; 48(10):1302–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Masseroli M, Visconti A, Giovanni Bano S, Pinciroli F. He@lthCo-op: a web-based system to support distributed health care co-operative work. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2006;36:109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiker NR, Hoy D, Casey A. Standards for nursing terminology. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2000;7:523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Russ AL, Saleem JJ, Justice CF, Woodward-Hagg H, Woodbridge PA, Doebbeling BN. Electronic health information in use: characteristics that support employee workflow and patient care. Health Informatics Journal 2010;16(4):287–305.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch T. The invisible technologies of Goffmann's sociology from the merry-go-round to the internet. Technology & Culture 2010;51(2):409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999;55(2):87–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brailer TG, Thomson DJ. The decade of health information technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich healthcare: framework for strategic action. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson Kazley A, Diana ML. Hospital computerized provider order entry adoption and quality: an examination of the United States. Health Care Management Review 2010;36(1):86–94.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Loo RP, van Gennip EMSJ, Bakker AR, Hasman A, Rutten FFH. Evaluation of automated information systems in healthcare: an approach to classifying evaluative studies. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1995;48(1–2):45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Battista RN, Hodge MJ. The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1999;160(10):1464–1467.
   Google Scholar
• Kling R. What is social informatics and why does it matter? The Information Society 2007;23:205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Skär L, Söderberg S. Swedish district nurses' experiences on the use of information and communication technology for supporting people with serious chronic illness living at home – a case study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 2010;24(2):259–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch S. Healthy ageing supported by technology – a cross-disciplinary research challenge. Informatics for Health & Social Care 2010;35(3–4):81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad P. Symbolic process in the implementation of technological change: a symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal 1993;36(6):1400–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley, CA and LosAngeles: University of California Press; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Kling R, McKim G. Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000;51(14):1306–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspers P. Etnografiska metoder (Ethnographic studies, in Swedish). Stockholm: Liber; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Winthereik BR, Bont AD, Berg M. Accessing the world of doctors and their computers: making available objects of study and the research site through ethnographic engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 2002;14(2):47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DE. The conceptual practices of power: a feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakou A. Design for places of collaboration. Dissertation (195 p. School of Computing 2011 Doctoral Dissertation Series No. 2011:08). Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DE. Institutional ethnography: a sociology for people. New York: Alta Mira Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Devault ML. Introduction: what is institutional ethnography? Social Problems 2006;53(3):294–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association [Internet]. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects; June 1964. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html (accessed 2 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bolger DJ, Balass M, Landen E, Perfetti CA. Context variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words: an instance-based learning approach. Discourses Processes 2008;45(2):122–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd edn. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman N, Balka E. Alt.metadata.health: ontological context for data use and integration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2009;18:83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer S. Social informatics: overview, principles and opportunities. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005;31(5):9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mead GH. Mind, self and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books Ltd; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social organization of medical work. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A. Negotiations: varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Web Accessibility Initiative (WCAG) [Internet]. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines; December 2011. Available from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/ (accessed 9 December 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson M, Bannon L. Questioning representations. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ECSCW; 24–27 September 1991:219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Kline R, Pinch T. The social construction of technology. In: MacKenzie D, Wajcman J. editors. The social shaping of technology. 2nd ed. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1999. pp. 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ginman M. Social capital as a communicative paradigm. Health Informatics Journal 2003;9:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs CL. Communicability, racial discourse, and disease. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005;34:269–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Schatzman L, Bucher R, Ehrlich D, Sabshin M. Psychiatric ideologies and institutions. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Sittig DF, Wright A, Osherhoff JA, Middleton B, Teich JM, Ash JS, Campbell E, Bates DW. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2008;41(2):387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. Informatics in biomedicine and health care. Academic Medicine 2009;84(7):818–820.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn TF. A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 2000;26:463–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Robey D. Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information System Research 1991;2(2):143–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, National Board of Health and Welfare. Nationell IT strategi för vård och omsorg. Var står vi idag? Lägesrapport; 2007 (National strategy for e-health. Where are we today? Progress report; 2007, in Swedish). Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, National Board of Health and Welfare; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn RL. The social psychology of organizations. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Balka E. Getting the big picture. The macro-politics of information system development (and failure) in a Canadian hospital. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003;42:324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuff EC, Payne GCF, Sharrock W, Francis D. Perspectives in sociology. Classical and contemporary. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.; 1998.
   Google Scholar