Wikis to facilitate patient participation in developing information leaflets: first experiences

References

• Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the internet and its implications for healthcare providers. Findings from the first health information national trends survey. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2618–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Clarke A. Internet information-seeking in mental health. Br J Psychiatry 2006;189:273–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox S, Jones S. Pew Internet & American Life Project 2009. The social life of health information 2009. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Health_2009.pdf via the INTERNET [last accessed 18 Feb 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Patients Like Me [Internet]. Available from: http://www.patientslikeme.com/ [last accessed 10 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. J Amer Med Assoc 2002;287:2691–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif F, Read JC, Goodacre JA, et al. The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information. Inform Health Soc Care 2009;34:231–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnersley P, Edwards A, Hood K, et al. Interventions before consultations to help patients address their information needs by encouraging question asking: systematic review. BMJ 2008;337:a485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a485
   Google Scholar
• Malik S, Coulson NS. ‘They all supported me but I felt like I suddenly didn’t belong anymore’ An exploration of perceived disadvantages to online support seeking. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010;31:140–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pos S, Bouwens J: [Patiëntenvoorlichting: Een theoretische verkenning]. Woerden: NIGZ; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Schoonacker M, Louckx F. Patiëntenvoorlichting in ziekenhuizen: Een verkennend onderzoek in Vlaanderen. Heverlee: Vrije Universiteit Brussel, vakgroep Medische Sociologie; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Wilson AH, Makoulb G, Bojarski EA, et al. Comparative analysis of print and multimedia health materials: a review of the literature. Pat Ed Couns 2012;89:7–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy I. Patients are experts in their own field. Br Med J 2003;326:1267--7
   Google Scholar
• Archambault PM, van de Belt TH, Grajales FJ III, et al. Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review protocol. J Med Int Res Res Protoc 2012;1:e1 . doi:10.2196/resprot.1993
   Google Scholar
• Boulos M, Maramba I, Wheelerldots S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical ldots. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heilman JM, Kemmann E, Bonert M, et al. Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion. J Med Internet Res 2011;13: e14. doi:10.2196/jmir.1589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikipedia.com [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wikipedia.com/ [last accessed 12 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Schroer J, Hertel G. Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia. Wikipedians and why they do it. Med Psy 2009;14:96–120
   Google Scholar
• Archambault PM. WikiBuild: a new application to support patient and health care professional involvement in the development of patient support tools. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e114. doi:10.2196/jmir.1961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nat Genet 2008;40:1047–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris ST, Zeng X. Using wiki in an online record documentation systems course. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2008;5:1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kardong-Edgren SE, Oermann MH, Ha Y, et al. Using a wiki in nursing education and research. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2009;6:Article 6
   Google Scholar
• Meishar-Tal H, Gorsky P. Wikis: what students do and do not do when writing collaboratively. J Open Dist Learn 2010;25:25–35
   Google Scholar
• Cobus L. Using blogs and wikis in a graduate public health course. Med Ref Serv Q 2009;28:22–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haagen EC, Tuil W, Hendriks J, et al. Current internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2073–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Gotlieb L, Ward S, et al. Use of the internet by infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1179–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor L, Mackert M. Perceptions of infertility information and support sources among female patients who access the Internet. Fertil Steril 2009;91:83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutsky BJ. Empowerment and leadership development in an online story-based learning community [dissertation]. United States – Florida: Nova Southeastern University. 2009. 247 p. UMI Number: 3366995
   Google Scholar
• Jones P. Collaboration at a distance: using a wiki to create a collaborative learning environment for distance education and on-campus students in a social work course. J Teachn Soc Work 2010;30:225–36
   Google Scholar
• Hulbert-Williams NJ. Facilitating collaborative learning using online wikis: evaluation of their application within postgraduate psychology teaching. Psychol Learn Teach 2010;9:45–51
   Google Scholar
• Brokowski L, Sheehan AH. Evaluation of pharmacist use and perception of Wikipedia as a drug information resource. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:1912–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott JV, Stec P, El-Toukhy T, et al. Infertility information on the world wide web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1520–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura K, Bernstein J, Fidler AT. Assessing the quality of infertility resources on the world wide web: tools to guide clients through the maze of fact and fiction. J Midw Wom Health 2002;47:264–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JYJ, Discepola F, Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T. Quality of fertility clinic websites. Fertil Steril 2005;83:538–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancet EA. Quality control in reproductive medicine: a patient’s perspective [dissertation]. University of Leuven; 2012. 447 p. Available from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/355816/
   Google Scholar
• van Empel IW, Dancet EA, Koolman XH, et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Hum Reprod 2011;26:584–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Empel IW, Nelen WL, Tepe ET, et al. Weaknesses, strengths and needs in fertility care according to patients. Hum Reprod 2010;25:142–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourad SM, Hermens RP, Cox-Witbraad T, et al. Information provision in fertility care: a call for improvement. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1420–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancet EA, Van Empel IW, Rober P, et al. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Hum Reprod 2011;26:827–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from european registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1851–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester Research Forrester’s new Social Technographics Report [Internet] Available from: http://forrester.typepad.com/groundswell/2007/04/forresters_new_.html/ [last accessed 10 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Thorn P. Understanding infertility: psychological and social considerations. Int J Fert Stil 2009;3:48–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik SH, Coulson MS. Computer-mediated infertility support groups: an exploratory study of online experiences. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:105–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuil WS, Verhaak CM, Braat DDM, et al. Empowering patients undergoing in vitro fertilization by providing internet access to medical data. Fertil Steril 2007;88:361–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MijnZorgnet [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mijnzorgnet.nl/ [last accessed 10 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Aarts JW. Personalized fertility care in the Internet era [dissertation]. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre; 2012. 287p. Available from: http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/98572/
   Google Scholar
• Hanson D. Knowledge sharing, maintenance, and use in online support communities [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Michigan; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aus 2004;180:57–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GR. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in research. Lanham: University Press of America; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Maycut P, Morehouse R. Beginning qualitative research: a philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Harmsen M, Peters M, Wensing M. Barriers and facilitators assessment. 2005
   Google Scholar
• Quora [Internet]. Available from: http://www.quora.com/Wikipedia/What-percentage-of-Wikipedia-users-actively-contribute-How-many-contributors-does-Wikipedia-have/ [last accessed 10 Oct 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Wan FT, Hall SE, Straus SE. An asthma action plan created by physician, educator and patient online collaboration with usability and visual design optimization. Resp 2012;84:406–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Breejen EM, Nelen WL, Knijnenburg JM, et al. Feasibility of a wiki as a participatory tool for patients in clinical guideline development. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e138 . doi:10.2196/jmir.2080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Belt TH, Berben SAA, Samsom M, et al. Use of social media by Western European Hospitals: longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e61 . doi:10.2196/jmir.1992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates DW, Wells S. Personal health records and health care utilization. J Amer Med Assoc 2012;308:2034–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar