412
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

EMR continuance usage intention of healthcare professionals

, , &

References

  • Kazley AS, Ozcan YA. Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: a national study. Journal of Medical Systems 2007;31(5):375–384.
  • Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, et al. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 2009;360(16):1628–1638.
  • Crosson JC, Etz RS, Wu SY, et al. Meaningful use of electronic prescribing in 5 exemplar primary care practices. Annals of Family Medicine 2011;9:392–397.
  • Bria WF. The electronic health record: Is it meaningful yet? Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2011;86(5):373–374.
  • Li JS, Zhou TS, Chu J, et al. Design and development of an international clinical data exchange system: The international layer function of the Dolphin Project. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18(5):683–689.
  • Cutler DM. The next wave of corporate medicine—How we all might benefit. The New England Journal of Medicine 2009;361(6):549–551.
  • Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Research 2010;10(1):231.
  • Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation- confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 2001;25(3):351–370.
  • Liao C, Palvia P, Chen J-L. Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a technology continuance theory (TCT). International Journal of Information Management 2009;29(4):309–320.
  • Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly 2004;28(2):229–254.
  • Morton ME, Wiedenbeck S. A framework for predicting EHR adoption attitudes: a physician survey. Perspectives in health information management/AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association 2009; 6(Fall).
  • Saghaeiannejad IS, Zarei J, Ajami S, Saidbakhsh S. Electronic medical records situation in selected hospitals in Ahvaz, Isfahan and Shiraz cities of Iran. Salamat Management Information 2011;8(6):774–784.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly 1989;13(3):319–340.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975.
  • Karahanna E, Straub DW. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management 1999;35(4):237–250.
  • Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research 1995;6(2):144–176.
  • Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians a new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review 2007;64(6):650–672.
  • Hu PJ, Chau PY, Sheng ORL, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;16(2):91–112.
  • Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KR. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2003;12(1):752–780.
  • Lin C, Lin IC, Roan J. Barriers to physicians’ adoption of healthcare information technology: An empirical Study on multiple hospitals. Journal of Medical Systems 2012;36(3):1965–1977.
  • Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 1980;17(4):460–469.
  • Lee MC. Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers and Education 2010;54(2):506–516.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test*. Decision Sciences 1996;27(3):451–481.
  • Zailani S, Gilani MS, Nikbin D, Iranmanesh M. Determinants of telemedicine acceptance in selected public hospitals in Malaysia: Clinical perspective. Journal of Medical Systems 2014;38(9):1–12.
  • Zailani S, Iranmanesh M, Nikbin D, Beng JKC. Determinants of RFID Adoption in Malaysia’s healthcare industry: Occupational level as a moderator. Journal of Medical Systems 2015;39(1):1–11.
  • Roca, JC, Gagné, M. Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 2008;24(4):1585–1604.
  • Yang KC. Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore. Telematics and Informatics 2005;22(3):257–277.
  • Pai FY, Huang KI. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011;78(4):650–660.
  • Son H, Park Y, Kim C, Chou JS. Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Automation in Construction 2012;28:82–90.
  • Hung SY, Liang TP, Chang CM. A meta-analysis of empirical research using TAM. Journal of Information Management 2005;12(4):211–234.
  • Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM 1983;26(10):785–793.
  • Lam SY, Shankar V, Erramilli MK, Murthy B. Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2004;32(3):293–311.
  • DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success revisited. In System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on; 2002 Jan; IEEE. pp. 2966–2976.
  • DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 1992;3(1):60–95.
  • Oliver RL. Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research 1993;20(3):418–430.
  • LaTour SA, Peat NC. Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research. In Wilkie WL, (ed.). Advances in consumer research, vol. 8. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research; 1979;6(1):431–437.
  • Bolton RN, Drew JH. A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research 1991;375–384.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46(2):186–204
  • Hair JF, Ringle CM, M. Sarsedt PLS-SEM:Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011;19(2):139–151.
  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; 2010.
  • Iranmanesh M, Zailani S, Moeinzadeh S, Nikbin D. Effect of green innovation on job satisfaction of electronic and electrical manufacturers’ employees through job intensity: personal innovativeness as moderator. Review of Managerial Science 2015; (In Press).
  • Zailani SH, Subaramaniam KS, Iranmanesh M, Shaharudin MR. The impact of supply chain security practices on security operational performance among logistics service providers in an emerging economy: Security culture as moderator. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 2015;45(7):652–673.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981;18(1):39–50.
  • Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012;40(3):414–433.
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodnessof-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling 2002;9:233–55.
  • Steenkamp JEM, Baumgartner H. The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 1992;19(3):434–48.
  • Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society1974; 36(2):111–133.
  • Geisser S. The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975:70(350):320–328.
  • Chin WW. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, (eds.). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields. Berlin: Springer; 2010:655–690.
  • Wetzels M, Odekerken-Schroder G, van Oppen C. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 2009;33(1):177–195.
  • Lin KM. e-Learning continuance intention: Moderating effects of user e-learning experience. Computers & Education 2011;56(2):515–526.
  • Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. International journal of medical informatics 2007;76(1):66–77.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.