Interpretation of compound nouns by adolescents with specific language impairment and autism spectrum disorders: An investigation of phenotypic overlap

References

• Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Medlrum, D., . (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: The Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). The Lancet, 368, 210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 373–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The Children's Communication Checklist. London: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2010). Overlaps between autism and language impairment: Phenomimicry or shared etiology? Behavior Genetics, 40, 618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booij, G. (2010). Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?: A construction morphology perspective. In S. Scalise, & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. V. (1995). Later lexical development and word formation. In P. Fletcher, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 393–412). Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, P. J., & Stone, C. A. (1994). The conceptual basis for morpheme learning problems in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 389–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 741–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Sentence processing strategies in children with expressive and expressive-receptive specific language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 117–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombonne, E., Bolton, P., Prior, J., Jordan, H., & Rutter, M. (1997). A family study of autism: Cognitive patterns and levels in parents and siblings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 667–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35, 116–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain and Language, 101, 50–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta, L. (2010). Synthetic compounds. With special reference to German. In S. Scalise, & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 219–235). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual-process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 365–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1996). The Children's Test of Non-Word Repetition. London: Psychological Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary growth during the early school years: a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grela, B., Snyder, W., & Hiramatsu, K. (2005). The production of novel root compounds in children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19, 701–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta, L. (2010). Synthetic compounds. With special reference to German. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding (pp. 219–235). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Happé, F. (2000). Parts and wholes, meaning and minds: Central coherence and its relation to theory of mind. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience. (2nd ed.) (pp. 203–221) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). A test of central coherence: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71, 149–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the Embedded Figures Test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In I.-S. Yank (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 3–91). Seoul: Hanshin.
   Google Scholar
• Kjelgaard, M. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). An investigation of language impairment in autism: implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 287–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, A., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39, 51–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., . (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Generic: A Standard Measure of Social and Communication Deficits Associated with the Spectrum of Autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. (2000). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007). Derivational morphology in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 71–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. W., Magimairaj, B. M., & Finney, M. C. (2010). Working memory and specific language impairment: An update on the relation and perspectives on assessment and treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2003). What compound nouns mean to preschool children. Brain and Language, 84, 38–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2006). Preschool children's acquisition of compounds. In G. Libben, & G. Jarema (Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words (pp. 96–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoladis, E. (2007). Acquisition of deverbal compounds by French-speaking preschoolers. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 79–102.
   Google Scholar
• Padrik, M., & Tamtik, M. (2009). Comprehension and production of noun compounds by Estonian children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 375–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, S. J., & Gathercole, S. E., (2001). Working Memory Test Battery for Children. London: Psychological Corporation Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum, G. (2008). Canoe wives and unnatural semantic relations. The Language Log. Available online at: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/, accessed 26 April 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, D. (2004). Derivational morphology revisited: Later lexical development in Hebrew. Language development across childhood and adolescence, trends in language acquisition research (pp. 53–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Riches, N. G., Loucas, T., Baird, G., Charman, T., & Simonoff, E. (2010a). Non-word repetition in adolescents with specific language impairment and autism plus language impairments: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 23–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches, N. G., Loucas, T., Charman, T., Simonoff, E., & Baird, G. (2010b). Sentence repetition in adolescents with specific language impairments and autism: An investigation of complex syntax. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. A., Rice, M. L., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). Tense marking in children with autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 429–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. (1988). Compound syntax and head movement. Yearbook of Morphology, 1, 187–228.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, M., Bailey, A., Lord, C., & Berument, S. K. (2003). Social communication questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, N., Daly, E., & Murphy, D. (2007). Frontal anatomy and reaction time in Autism. Neuroscience Letters, 412, 12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W.. (2000). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Third Edition UK (CELF-3UK). London: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H.. (2004). Do autism and specific language impairment represent overlapping language disorders? In M. L. Rice, & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 31–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tallal, P., Stark, R., Kallman, C., & Mellits, D. (1985). Identification of language-impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain and Language, 25, 314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B. (2010). Co-morbidly of autism and SLI: kinds, Kin or confounds? Presented at the Winter Lecture of the International Journal for Language and Communication Disorders, City University London.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lely, H. K., & Christian, V. (2000). Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: a grammar-specific versus an input-processing deficit? Cognition, 75, 33–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernes, S. C., Newbury, D. F., Abrahams, B. S., Winchester, L., Nicod, J., Groszer, M., . (2008). A functional genetic link between distinct developmental language disorders. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 2337–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, A. J. O., Barry, J. G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2008). Further defining the language impairment of autism: Is there a specific language impairment subtype? Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 319–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D., Botting, N., & Boucher, J. (2008). Language in autism and specific language impairment: where are the links? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 944–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor, J., & Hwang, M.. (1999a). Derivational suffix productivity for students with and without language-learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 220–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor, J., & Hwang, M.. (1999b). Children's auditory lexical decisions: A limited processing capacity account of language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 990–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar