A qualitative study of legal and social justice needs for people with aphasia

References

• Bateman, N. (2000). Advocacy skills for health and social care professionals. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, P. D. (2005). Welfare receipt among children living with grandparents. Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 411–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C., & Petheram, B. (2011). Delivering for aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corti, L., & Thompson, P. (2007). Secondary analysis of archived data. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 297–313). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coumarelos, C., & Wei, Z. (2009). The legal needs of people with different types of chronic illness or disability. Justice Issues, 11, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Coumarelos, C., Macourt, D., People, J., McDonald, H., Wei, Z., Iriana, R., et al. (2012). Legal Australia-wide survey: Legal need in Australia. Sydney, Australia: Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Coumarelos, C., Wei, Z., & Zhou, A. (2006). Justice made to measure: NSW legal needs survey in disavantaged areas. Access to Justice and Legal Needs, 3, 81–137.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, M. (1970). Aphasiology. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Discrimination Act (No. 135 of 1992) Retrieved 14 July 2011, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/dda1992264/.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J. (1996). Access to justice for people with severe communication impairment. Australian Journal of Administrative Law, 3, 73–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, S., Schetzer, L., Mullins, J., Perry, J., & Wong, K. (2004). The legal needs of older people in NSW. Sydney: Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Enderby, P. (1994). The testamentary capacity of dysphasic patients. Medico-Legal Journal, 62, 70–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelter, S. T., Gostynski, M., Papa, S., Frei, M., Born, C., & Ajdacic-Gross, V. (2006). Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke, 37, 1379–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Duffield, G., & Worrall, L. (2010). Legal decision-making by people with aphasia: Critical incidents for speech pathologists. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Worrall, L., & Sherratt, S. (2009). The impact of communication disability on interdisciplinary discussion in rehabilitation case conferences. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31, 1795–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Worrall, L., McPhee, J., Buskell, R., Armstrong, E., & Togher, L. (2003). Testamentary capacity and aphasia: A descriptive case report with implications for clinical practice. Aphasiology, 17, 965–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fucetola, R., Tabor-Connor, L., Perry, J., Leo, P., Tucker, F., & Corbetta, M. (2006). Aphasia severity, semantics, and depression predict functional communication in acquired aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 449–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, A., Forell, S., & Clarke, S. (2009). Cognitive impairment, legal need and access to justice. Justice Issues, 10, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hilari, K., & Byng, S. (2009). Health-related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Black, S. E., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversation partners using Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten, P., Low, J. T. S., Ashburn, A., George, S. L., & McLellan, D. L. (2002). The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: Results of a national UK survey. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 860–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., Llewellyn, G., & Ferronato, L. (2000). Parents with a disability and the NSW Children's Court. Sydney: University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L., & Zeece, P. D. (2008). Grandparents in the lives of young children: Redefining roles and responsibilities. In M. J. Jalongo (Ed.), Enduring bonds: The significance of interpersonal relationships in young children’s lives (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, A., Pleasence, P., Balmer, N., Buck, A., & Genn, H. (2004). Disability, social exclusion and the consequential experience of justiciable problems. Disability and Society, 19, 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poland, D. B. (2002). Transcription quality. In J. Gubrium, & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 629–649). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, C., Duchan, J., Penman, T., Hewitt, A., & Parr, S. (2007). Communication access to organisations: Inclusionary practices for people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2000). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Bundoora, Australia: QSR.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, T. A., Worrall, L. E., & McKenna, K. T. (2003). The effectiveness of aphasia-friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology, 17, 947–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schetzer, L., & Henderson, J. (2003). Public consultations: A project to identify legal needs, pathways and barriers for disadvantaged people in NSW, Access to justic and legal needs (Vol. 1)., Sydney: Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Schetzer, L., Mullins, J., & Buonamano, R. (2003). Access to justice and legal needs: A project to identify legal needs, pathways and barriers for disadvantaged people in NSW – background paper Access to justice and legal needs (Vol. 1). Sydney, Australia: Law and Justice Foundation of NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Senes, S. (2006). How we manage stroke in Australian. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. H. (1992). Legal-ethical considerations, restrictions, and obligations for clinicians who treat communicative disorders (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. S. (2007). Access and social inclusion in aphasia: Interactional principles and applications. Aphasiology, 21, 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. L., Sperry, L., & Yarbrough, M. S. (2000). Grandparents as parents: Research findings and policy recommendations. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 31, 3–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell, R., Sullivan, R. A., & Schlanger, P. H. (1980). Legal competency of aphasic patients: Role of speech-language pathologists. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 374–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2001). Introduction ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health (pp. 1–25). Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., et al. (2011). What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology, 25, 309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar