Acute evaluation of conversational discourse skills in traumatic brain injury

References

• Baker, H. J., & Leland, B. (1965). Detroit Test of Learning Aptitude. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Bashore, T. R., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Older age, traumatic brain injury, and cognitive slowing: Some convergent and divergent findings. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 151–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. de S. (1976). Multilingual Aphasia Examination Manual, (Rev. ed.). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, R., & Crowe, S. F. (2006). The relationship between working memory, processing speed and verbal comprehension and FAS performance following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20, 971–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body, R., & Perkins, M. R. (2004). Validation of linguistic analyses in narrative discourse after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 707–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracy, C., & Douglas, J. (2005). Marital dyad perceptions of injured partners’ communication following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 6, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J. (1991). The Hopkins verbal learning test: Development of a new memory test with six equivalent forms. Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cifu, D. X., Keyser-Marcus, L., Lopez, E., Wehman, P., Kreutzer, J. S., Englander, J., et al. (1997). Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 223–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C., Youse, K., Lê, K., & Feinn, R. (2003). Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminant analysis. Aphasiology, 17, 499–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1232–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 122–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991). Discourse analyses with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 465–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Youse, K. M., & Lê, K. N. (2002). Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 16, 659–672.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, H., Moix, V., & Giroux, F. (2004). Évaluation des troubles de la communication des cérébrolésés droits. Rééducation Orthophonique, 219, 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, C., Hawlely, L., Morey, C., Newman, J., Cusick, C. P., & Harrison-Felix, C. (2006). Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury, 20, 425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S. (1985). Clinical discourse analysis: a functional approach to language assessment. In C. S. Simon (Ed.), Communication skills and classroom success (pp. 165–203). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. (2010). Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 365–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. M., O’Flaherty, C. A., & Snow, P.C. (2000). Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology, 14, 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F. R. (1996). Cognitive slowing in closed-head injury. Brain and Cognition, 32, 429–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, R. P., Joanette, Y., Côté, H., Ska, B., Giroux, F., Fachel, J. M. G., et al. (2008). Brazilian version of the Protocole Montréal d’Évaluation de la Communication (Protocole MEC): Normative and reliability data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 678–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski, T., Tompkins, C., & Johnston, M. V. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social; integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12, 769–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, F. C., & Levin, H. S. (2001). Cognitive outcome after mild and moderate traumatic brain injury in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 739–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new response in a Weigl type card sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404–411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5, 267–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoofien, D., Gilboa, A., Vakil, E., & Donovick, P. (2001). Traumatic brain injury 10–20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury, 15, 189–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett, B., Snoek, J., Bond, M. R., & Brooks, N. (1981). Disability after severe head injury: Observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 44, 285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Ska, B., & Côté, H. (2004). Protocole Montréal d’Évaluation de la Communication. Isbergues: Ortho Édition.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, C. (1995). Dysnomia following traumatic brain injury: An information processing approach to assessment. Brain Injury, 9, 777–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lê, K., Mozeiko, J., & Coelho, C. (2011). Discourse analyses: Characterizing cognitive-communication disorders following TBI. Rockville, Maryland:The ASHA Leader.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, M. G., & Brooks, N. D. (1988). The burden on families of the brain injured: A review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 3, 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 295–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1998). Requests that overcome listener reluctance: Impairment associated with executive dysfunction in brain injury. Brain and Language, 61, 88–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Code, C. (1999). Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 53, 695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, C., & Douglas, J. (1997). Living with cognitive communicative difficulties following traumatic brain injury: Using a model of interpersonal communication to characterize the subjective experience. Aphasiology, 11, 889–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, J., Ponsford, J., & Curran, C. (1996). Outcome following traumatic brain injury: A comparison between two and five years after injury. Brain Injury, 10, 841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Kelly, A. M., Nelms, R., et al. (2000). Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 568–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford, J. L., Olver, J. H., & Curran, C. K. (1995). Prediction of employment status 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9, 11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappaport, M., Hall, K. M., Hopkins, H. K., Belleza, T., & Cope, D. N. (1982). Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as indicator of organic brain damage. Perception and Motor Skills, 8, 271–276.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, A. (1964). L'examen Clinique en Pyschologie. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, P., Douglas, J., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following traumatic brain injury: A follow up study. Brain Injury, 12, 911–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, C. E., Yorkston, K. M., & Pimentel, J. I. (2000). Discourse production following mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury: A comparison of two tasks. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Struchen, M. A., Clark, A. N., Sander, A. M., Mills, M. R., Evans, G., & Kurtz, D. (2008). Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 185–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen, M. A., Pappadis, M. R., Sander, A. M., Burrows, C. S., & Myszka, K. A. (2011). Examining the contribution of social communication abilities and affective/behavioral functioning to social integration outcomes for adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 26, 30–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11, 169–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A. (2012). Rehabilitation for cognitive-communication disorders in right hemisphere brain damage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, S61–S69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, F. M., & Hanlon, R. E. (1998). Effects of mild traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse production. Brain Injury, 12, 783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). WMS III manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. H., Levin, H. S., & Eisenberg, H. M. (1990). Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery, 27, 422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, M. (1992). Communication outcome following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13, 239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, M., Szekeres, S. F., & Feeney, T. (2008). Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia. (5th ed.) (pp. 879–962). Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Youse, K., & Coelho, C. (2005). Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed head injury. Brain Injury, 19, 1001–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar