Content validity to support the use of a computer-based phonological awareness screening and monitoring assessment (Com-PASMA) in the classroom

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• AIMSweb. (2014). AIMSweb – Always learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Available online at: http://www.aimsweb.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch Model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care, 42, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2008). Success through partnership: Achieving a national vision for ICT in schools – Strategic plan to guide the implementation of the Digital Education Revolution initiative and related initiatives. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government. Available online at: http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/static/docs/hotTopics/Success_through_partnership_-_Achieving_a_national_vision_for_ICT_in_schools.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2011). Review of funding for schooling – Final report. Canberra, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. (2014). Schools in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government. Available online at: http://www.studyinaustralia.gov.au/global/australian-education/schools.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory: ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation. University of Maryland, College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, W. N. (2012). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities – New best practice for general and special educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). London, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, K., Boustead, T., & Gillon, G. (2013a). Predicting reading outcomes in the classroom using a computer-based phonological awareness screening and monitoring assessment (Com-PASMA). International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 552–561.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, K., Gillon, G., & Boustead, T. (2011). Computer- administered versus paper-based assessment of school entry phonological awareness ability. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing, 14, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, K., Gillon, G. & Boustead, T. (2013b). Classroom phonological awareness instruction and literacy outcomes in the first year of school. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 147–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• DECD. (2012). SA Strategic Plan – Target 14 Early Childhood. South Australia, Australia: Government of South Australia. Available online at: http://saplan.org.au/targets/14-early-childhood-year-1-literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, B., Crosbie, S., McIntosh, B., Teitzel, T., & Ozanne, A. (2000). Preschool and primary inventory of phonological awareness (PIPA). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287, 311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrler, D. J., & McGhee, R. L. (2008). Primary Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (PTONI). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., Borstrom, I., & Peterson, D. K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 36–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson, S., & Reise, S. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., III, & Kaminski, R. A. (2003). DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Guernsey, L., Levine, M., Chiong, C., and Severns, M. (2012). Pioneering literacy in the digital wild west: Empowering parents and educators. Available online at: http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/GLR_TechnologyGuide_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., Hedditch, J., & Yin, I. (2011). ICT in schools report 2011: Information & communications technology in New Zealand schools 1993–2011. Research New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand. Available online at: http://www.2020.org.nz/template/ict_2011_final_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, M. (2010). A user's guide to Winsteps. Beaverton, Oregon. Available online at: http://www.winsteps.com/winman/index.htm?guide.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education. Educational Researcher, 36, 437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2004). New Zealand Articulation Test (NZAT). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012). PIRLs 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, T. (2009). Should beginner readers rely on context clues or not: The case for and against. Paper presented at the Literacy Research Symposium, 1–2 October 2009, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Austin, D., Lewis, B. A., McSweeny, J. L., & Wilson, D. L. (1997). The speech disorders classification system (SDCS): Extensions and lifespan reference data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 723–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, C. H., Thomas, K. V., & Leedale, R. C. (1996). Lucid CoPS Cognitive Profiling System. Beverley, East Yorkshire: Lucid Research Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymms, P. T. (1999). Baseline assessment, value-added and the prediction of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEF. (2010). The children left behind: A league table of inequality in child well-being in the world's rich countries (Vol. Innocenti Report Card 9). Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• van Bon, W. H. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2003). Assessing phonemic awareness in kindergarten: The case for the phonemic recognition task. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, E., Secord, W., & Semel, E. (2006). Clinical Evaluations of Language Fundamentals Preschool - Australian and New Zealand (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar